Search

Search Results

• Interpretation of the Convention about human rights protection principles in Ukraine’s court practice on tax disputes

  Igor Babin, Svitlana Karvatska

  11-24

  2019-05-04
• City mayor in times of occupation and judges of the Special Court in Toruń (i.e. about historical and legal paradoxes)

  Witold Kulesza

  135-162

  2021-07-18
• Gloss to resolution of Supreme Court of 20th November 2019, III CZP 3/19

  Konrad Balcerowski

  367-382

  2021-07-18
• The right to a fair trial and the reform of the administrative court procedure

  Bartłomiej Chludziński

  43-66

  2016-02-26
• Procedural aspects of disciplinary responsibility of judges in the 2nd Republic Of Poland. The course of a process in the light of judges’ personal and disciplinary files from the old-Prussian territories

  Tomasz Kucharski, Aleksandra Wasielewicz

  113-134

  2021-07-18
• Weaknesses in the content of invoices and breach of the obligation to have them and the right to deduct input tax from output tax in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

  Marek Kalinowski

  85-102

  2020-07-03
• The notion of insolvency court

  Marek Mrówczyński

  161-183

  2025-04-07
• Suspension of the execution of a resolution of premises owners in proceedings to secure claims against the background of other regulations

  Zbigniew Kwaśniewski Aleksandra Sikorska-Lewandowska

  93-110

  2016-03-18
• Taksa sądu ziemskiego w Oleśnicy z ostatniej dekady XVI wiek

  Marian J. Ptak

  221-232

  2012-06-01
• Acceptability of court interference in the content of the resolution of the housing community – gloss to the judgment of the Supreme Court of March 21, 2019, II CSK 62/18 (critical)

  Aleksandra Sikorska-Lewandowska

  383-398

  2021-07-18
• Unfair contract terms legislation as a tool for striking out excessive price clauses? Practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Polish courts

  Piotr Sitnik

  247-267

  2020-01-13
• Demonstrating the lack of funds to pay court costs by a legal person within the meaning of article 103 of the law on court fees

  Natalia Oślizło-Doskocz

  239-252

  2019-05-14
• The burden of proof in disputes aroused from employment relationship – selected issues

  Aneta Krasuń

  191-210

  2020-05-19
• The gloss to decision of the Supreme Court of 30 May 2017 in the case no. II PK 125/16 – approving gloss

  Piotr Pieczonka

  378-403

  2018-10-08
• Expiry of an employment relationship for a reason not regulated by law – a gloss to the resolution of the Supreme Court of February 1, 2017, III PZP 11/16

  Jolanta Drobot

  205-220

  2020-07-03
• Statutory right of withdrawal of a synallagmatic agreement – ex consequenti of selected jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in connection with Article 491 par.1, Civil Code

  Piotr Lewandowski

  231-254

  2021-05-19
• The future reform of the criminal procedure. Maybe the no case to answer could be introduced?

  Piotr Hofmański

  77-92

  2021-07-18
• Gloss to the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of 5 April 2016, II FSK 462/14

  Magdalena Oleksy

  381-396

  2021-05-19
• Presidency of Donald Trump and expected changes of judicature of the Supreme Court of the United States

  Mariusz Braszkiewicz

  27-45

  2018-10-10
• Individual responsibility of the Heads of State, Head of Government and the Senior Government Officials for international crime. Voice in discussion

  Przemysław Krawczyk

  211-230

  2021-05-19
• Some Comments on International Agreements in the Light of Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean Case

  Marcin Kałduński

  103-120

  2020-07-03
• Gloss to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 14 December 2017, II PK 322/16

  Jan Piątkowski, Beata Rutkowska

  247-260

  2020-07-09
• A gloss to the judgement of 31 may 2019 of the District Court in Częstochowa, 4 U 241/19

  Piotr Lewandowski

  233-246

  2020-07-09
• The critical gloss to the resolution of seven judges of the Supreme Court of 28th January 2016, I KZP 15/15

  Jan Kluza

  457-464

  2019-05-16
• Gloss to the Supreme Court Judgment of 23 February 2017, I CSK 232/16

  Daniel Setcki

  355-364

  2019-10-05