Uwięzienie w konwencji. Jakościowa metasynteza badań na temat zaangażowania obywatelskiego młodych
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2021.024Słowa kluczowe
citizenship engagement, citizenship participation, active citizenship, youth, qualitative research, meta-synthesisAbstrakt
The aim of the analysis presented in this article is an attempt to locate patterns and barriers concerning the understanding of citizenship engagement of young people in scientific research and social practices (mainly educational) analyzed in these research. To achieve this goal, a meta-synthesis of qualitative research was carried out. The analysis covered 27 publications from the last ten years, which were selected in a multi-stage process. First, a systematic review of these publications was carried out using the following criteria: temporal, field of science, type of publication, language of publication. Then, the content of abstracts was reviewed and the accessibility criterion was applied. Finally, the full content was reviewed. To evaluate the abstracts and the full content of the articles, questions were used that were created on the basis of the CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. The publications included in this way were subject to open coding. As a result, four general descriptive codes and a number of specific ones were obtained. In-depth analysis led to the identification of 4 patterns limiting the interpretation of the engagement of young people. Two of them relate to research and refer to the understanding of citizenship involvement itself and the form of it related to activity in media. Thus, they show the imprisonment of some researchers in the conventional understanding of citizenship engagement and its forms. The next two patterns concern social practices, including educational. They show imprisonment in structure and organization as well as in the culturally dominant approach to understanding citizenship engagement.
Bibliografia
Amnå, E., Ekman, J. (2014). Standby Citizens: Diverse Faces of Political Passivity. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 261–281, https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391300009X.
Ballard, P. J., Cohen, A. K., Littenberg-Tobias, J. (2016). Action Civics for Promoting Civic Development: Main Effects of Program Participation and Differences by Project Characteristics. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(3–4), 377–390, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12103.
Banaji, S. (2020). Introduction. W: S. Banaji, S. Mejias (red.), Youth Active Citizenship in Europe. Ethnographies of Participation (s. 1–36). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bauml, M., Quinn, B. P., Blevins, B., Magill, K. R., LeCompte, K. (2021). “I Really Want to Do Something”: How Civic Education Activities Promote Thinking Toward Civic Purpose Among Early Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211006785.
Beck, C. T. (2011). Meta-synthesis: Helping Qualitative Research Take its Rightful Place in the Hierarchy of Evidence. Journal of Japanese Society of Nursing Research, 34(3), 76–82.
Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. W: W. L. Bennett (red.), Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (s. 1–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bennett, W. L. (2012). The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428.
CASP [Critical Appraisal Skills Programme] (2018). CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. Pobrano 2 sierpnia 2021 z: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
Clark, L. S., Monserrate, R. (2011). High School Journalism and the Making of Young Citizens. Journalism, 12(4), 417–432, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388225.
Crossan, J., Cumbers, A., McMaster, R., Shaw, D. (2016). Contesting Neoliberal Urbanism in Glasgow’s Community Gardens: The Practice of DIY Citizenship. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 48(4), 937–955.
Durrant, I., Peterson, A., Hoult, E., Leith, L. (2012). Pupil and Teacher Perceptions of Community Action: An English Context. Educational Research, 54(3), 259–283, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.710087.
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2003). Metasynthesis: The State of the Art—So Far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893–904, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253462.
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2018). A Guide to Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. New York: Routledge.
Gibson, S., Hamilton, L. (2013). Knowledge, Autonomy and Maturity: Developmental and Educational Concerns as Rhetorical Resources in Adolescents’ Discussions Regarding the Age of Electoral Majority in England. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(1), 34–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.693589.
Goodman, N., Bastedo, H., Leduc, L., Pammett, J. H. (2011). Young Canadians in the 2008 Federal Election Campaign: Using Facebook to Probe Perceptions of Citizenship and Participation. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 859–881, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423911000783.
Groot, I. de, Veugelers, W. (2015). Why We Need to Question the Democratic Engagement of Adolescents in Europe. Journal of Social Science Education, 14(4), 27–38, https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v14-i4-1426.
Harris, A., Roose, J. (2014). DIY Citizenship Amongst Young Muslims: Experiences of the ‘Ordinary’. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(6), 794–813, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.844782.
Hartley, J. (1999). The Uses of Television. London: Routledge.
Ho, L.-C., Sim, J. B.-Y., Alviar-Martin, T. (2011). Interrogating Differentiated Citizenship Education: Students’ Perceptions of Democracy, Rights and Governance in Two Singapore Schools. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 6(3), 265–276, https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197911417417.
Hobololo, T. S., Mawela, T. (2017). Exploring the Use of Mobile Phones for Public Participation in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9(1), 57–68, https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2017.090105.
Hoskins, B. (2006). A Framework for the Creation of Indicators on Active Citizenship and Education and Training for Active Citizenship. Ispra: Joint Research Centre.
Hoskins, B., Jesinghaus, J., Mascherini, M., Munda, G., Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Van Nijlen, D., Vidoni, D., Villalba, E. (2006). Measuring Active Citizenship in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Ingram, L.-A. (2014). Re-imagining Roles: Using Collaborative and Creative Research Methodologies to Explore Girls’ Perspectives on Gender, Citizenship and Schooling. Educational Action Research, 22(3), 306–324, https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.872574.
Jolliffe, P. (2017). Karen Youth Transitions at the Thai-Myanmar Border. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(10), 1313–1327, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1333581
.
Kenis, A., Mathijs, E. (2012). Beyond Individual Behaviour Change: The Role of Power, Knowledge and Strategy in Tackling Climate Change. Environmental Education Research, 18(1), 45–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.576315.
Kopińska, V. (2017). Edukacja obywatelska w szkole. Krytyczna analiza dyskursu podręczników szkolnych. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Koudelka, C. M. (2021). Tapping Teen Power: (Re)Positioning Students for Civic Action. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 64(4), 389–398, https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1126.
Lall, M. (2012). Citizenship in Pakistan: State, Nation and Contemporary Faultlines. Contemporary Politics, 18(1), 71–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2011.619773.
Li, Z. (2017). Citizenship Education ‘Goes Global’: Extra-Curricular Learning in an Overseas Campus of a British Civic University. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 36(6), 662–678, https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2017.1375565.
Lucena, H. M. A., Caramelo, J. C. P., Silva, S. B. (2019). Popular Education and Youth: The Social Movement as an Educational Space. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 49(174), 290–315, https://doi.org/10.1590/198053146754.
Major, C. H., Savin-Baden, M. (2010). An Introduction to Qualitative Research Synthesis: Managing the Information Explosion in Social Science Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Malila, V., Oelofsen, M., Garman, A., Wasserman, H. (2013). Making Meaning of Citizenship: How ‘Born Frees’ Use Media in South Africa’s Democratic Evolution. Communicatio, 39(4), 415–431, https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2013.852598.
Manning, N., Akhtar, P. (2020). ‘No, We Vote for Whoever We Want to’: Young British Muslims Making New Claims on Citizenship Amidst Ongoing Forms of Marginalisation. Journal of Youth Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1784855.
Mansouri, F., Kirpitchenko, L. (2016). Practices of Active Citizenship Among Migrant Youth: Beyond Conventionalities. Social Identities, 22(3), 307–323, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1119680.
Mascheroni, G. (2017). A Practice-Based Approach to Online Participation: Young People’s Participatory Habitus as a Source of Diverse Online Engagement. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4630–4651.
Mikolajczyk, C., Eckstein, K., Noack, P. (2020). Youth Organisations as a Developmental Context: A Developmental Psychological Perspective. W: S. Banaji, S. Mejias (red.), Youth Active Citizenship in Europe. Ethnographies of Participation (s. 63–88). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Noblit, G. W., Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of Qualitative Health Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pirk, R., Nugin, R. (2016). Multiple Faces of Conventional Political Activism: A Youth Council Case Study. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 8(2), 81–100.
Ratto, M., Boler, M. (red.) (2014). DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Richez, J.-C. (2005). ‘Avant-propos’. W: V. Becquet, C. De Linarès (red.), Quand les jeunes s’engagent. Entre expérimentations et constructions identitaires. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Rubin, B. C., Ayala, J., Zaal, M. (2017). Authenticity, Aims and Authority: Navigating Youth Participatory Action Research in the Classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 47(2), 175–194, https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2017.1298967.
Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Storr, R., Spaaij, R. (2017). ‘I Guess It’s Kind of Elitist’: The Formation and Mobilisation of Cultural, Social and Physical Capital in Youth Sport Volunteering. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 487–502, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241867.
Sullivan, T. K., Syvertsen, A. K. (2019). Conservation Leadership: A Developmental Model. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(2), 140–166, https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558417752638.
Sveningsson, M. (2015). “It’s Only a Pastime, Really”: Young People’s Experiences of Social Media as a Source of News about Public Affairs. Social Media and Society, 1(2), 139–156, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604855.
Sveningsson, M. (2016). ‘I Wouldn’t Have What It Takes’: Young Swedes’ Understandings of Political Participation. Young, 24(2), 139–156, https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308815603305.
Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit G., Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1342–1365, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269888.
Treviño, E., Carrasco, D. (2021). Good Citizenship and Youth: Understanding Global, Contextual, and Conceptual Tensions. W: E. Treviño, D. Carrasco, E. Claes, K. J. Kennedy (red.), Good Citizenship for the Next Generation. A Global Perspective Using IEA ICCS 2016 Data (s. 1–12). Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75746-5.
Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., Loader, B. (2015). Young People, Social Media and Connective Action: From Organisational Maintenance to Everyday Political Talk. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 80–100, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.933198.
Werbner, P., Yuval-Davis, N. (1999). Introduction: Women and the New Discourse of Citizenship. W: N. Yuval-Davis, P. Werbner (red.), Women, Citizenship and Difference (s. 1–38). London–New York: Zed Books.
Xu, Y. (2008). Methodological Issues and Challenges in Data Collection and Analysis of Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Asian Nursing Research, 2(3), 173–183.
Zalewska, A., Krzywosz-Rynkiewicz, B. (2011). Psychologiczne portrety młodych obywateli. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SWPS Academica.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 437
Liczba cytowań: 0