Values of the Young Generation in the Postmodern World: Challenges for Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SPI.2025.4.001Keywords
values, young generation, postmodernity, pedagogy, pluralism, educationAbstract
The contemporary world, characterized by rapid technological development, globalization, and pluralism of values, influences the belief systems of the young generation. This article analyzes the role of values in young people’s lives, examining the correlates and predictors of their choices between traditional and postmodern values. Particular attention was given to the influence of sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, and place of residence on the formation of value systems. The theoretical foundation for the study included axiological and sociological concepts concerning value transformations in postmodernity (Bauman, Giddens, Inglehart, Welzel), modernization theory, and approaches to cultural pluralism (Kymlicka, Parekh). The analysis highlights the impact of globalization, individualization, and the relativization of norms on shaping the value hierarchy of the young generation.
Empirical research was conducted among university students in southern Poland (N = 272; age 18–54; M = 27.63; SD = 8.64) using an author-designed survey questionnaire. The questionnaire contained items assessing the importance of value systems (1–7 scale) and 12 statements concerning traditional and postmodern values (Likert scale 1–5). The results indicated that the young generation places considerable importance on values, although their hierarchy depends on social and cultural factors. Key findings include, among others, stronger identification of older respondents with traditional values, greater reflexivity among women in matters of spirituality, and differences in the importance of religious values between urban and rural residents.
The discussion underscores the influence of postmodern tendencies, such as individualism and pragmatism, on contemporary perceptions of values, as well as the difficulties in establishing a coherent value system in a culturally diverse society. In the pedagogical context, the article identifies challenges related to educating the young generation in an era of postmodernity, including the need to integrate diverse value systems, effectively use technology in teaching, and maintain a balance between traditional and modern values.
References
Ahn J.S., Busque-Carrier M., Cho S., Rivard G. (2022). “Value change across adolescent years: How do adolescents’ intrinsic and extrinsic values develop?” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 99, no. 2, art. 104263; doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104263
Bauman Z. (2006). Płynna nowoczesność, trans. T. Kunz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Beck U. (2006). Społeczeństwo ryzyka. W drodze do innej nowoczesności, trans. S. Cieśla, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Beyers W., Soenens B., Vansteenkiste M. (2024). “Autonomy in Adolescence: A Conceptual, Developmental and Cross-cultural Perspective,” European Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 121–141, https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2024.2330734
Brink T.L., Bekhuis T. (2024). “Measurement of Religiosity. Research Starters,” EBSCO, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/measurement-religiosity [accessed: 05.03.2025].
Carr N. (2011). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Castells M. (2009). Communication Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://maestriacomunicacionibero.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/castells-power-in-the-network-society.pdf [accessed: 05.03.2025].
Giddens A. (2010). Nowoczesność i tożsamość. “Ja” i społeczeństwo w epoce późnej nowoczesności, trans. A. Szulżycka, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Giddens A. (2024). Socjologia trans. O. Siara, A. Szulżycka, P. Tomanek, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Heys E. (2024). “Cultural Evolution: Measuring Differences in Generational Values. Working Paper,” https://youngamericans.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/BIFYA_-cultural_evolution_062624.pdf [accessed: 06.03.2025].
Hsu T.W., Niiya Y., Thelwall M., Ko M., Knutson B., Tsai J.L. (2021). “Social Media Users Produce More Affect That Supports Cultural Values, But Are More Influenced by Affect That Violates Cultural Values,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 969–983, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000282
Huber S., Huber O.W. (2012). “The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS),” Religions, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 710–724, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
Humphrey A., Bliuc A.-M. (2022). “Western Individualism and the Psychological Wellbeing of Young People: A Systematic Review of Their Associations,” Youth, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2010001
Inglehart R., Welzel Ch. (2012). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korhonen V., Lindh K. (2010). “Youth Values and Value Changes from Cultural and Transnational Perspective.” [in:] V. Korhonen (ed.), Cross-cultural Lifelong Learning, Tampere: Tampere University Press, pp.135–166.
Kymlicka W. (1996). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewicka M. (2021). “Media – wartości – rodzina: możliwości pedagogicznego wsparcia,” Przegląd Pedagogiczny, no. 1, pp. 73–90.
Marek Z. (2017), “Religia, poznanie, duchowość w wychowaniu,” Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 19–59, doi: 10.12775/spi.2017.2.001
Mariański J. (2021). “O nowej duchowości – próba opisu zjawiska,” Nauki o Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 40–68, https://doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.12.04
Oczlon S., Bardach L. Lüftenegger M. (2021). “Immigrant Adolescents’ Perceptions of Cultural Pluralism Climate: Relations to Self-esteem, Academic Self-concept, Achievement, and Discrimination,” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 04 May 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20412
Parekh B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, London: Macmillan.
Pearce L.D., Hayward M., Pearlman J.A. (2017). “Measuring Five Dimensions of Religiosity across Adolescence,” Review of Religious Research, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 367-93, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13644-017-0291-8 [accessed: 15.03.2025].
Peret-Drążewska P. (2014). “Styl życia w czasach indywidualizacji. O wolnym wyborze jako kryterium dyferencjacji społecznej,” Studia Edukacyjne, no. 32, pp. 63–77.
Perry W.G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Prensky M. (2001). “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Part 1,” On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Rawicka I. (2020). “Współczesna młodzież, jej poglądy i wyznawane wartości,” Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 135–154, https://doi.org/10.25167/sth.1948
Roccas S., Elster A. (2014). “Values and Religiosity,” [in:] V. Saroglou (ed.), Religion, Personality, and Social Behavior, New York: Psychology Press, pp. 193–212.
Saroglou V. (2011). “Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging: The Big Four Religious Dimensions and Cultural Variation,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1320–1340, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267
Smith L.V., Wang M.-T., Hill D. J. (2020). “Black Youths’ Perceptions of School Cultural Pluralism, School Climate and the Mediating Role of Racial Identity,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 83, pp. 50–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.09.002
Smyła J. (2024). “Wartości polskiej młodzieży: przegląd badan,” [in:] P. Magier (ed.), Młodzież wobec wartości, Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych, pp. 117–144.
Smyła J., Szempruch J. (2024). “Współczesna młodzież a wyzwania dla edukacji,” [in:] J. Szempruch, A. Kotowska, J. Gałkowski (eds.), Edukacja w procesie przemian: realia, perspektywy rozwoju i potencjał innowacyjny, Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls, pp. 14–30
Sroczyński W. (2022). “Pedagogika społeczna wobec wartości,” Pedagogika Społeczna Nova, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 107–120, https://doi.org/10.14746/psn.2022.3.6
Strosser G.L., Jonason P.K., Lawson R., Reid A.N., Vittum-Jones A.W. (2016). “Religiosity Scale [Database record]”. APA PsycTests, https://doi.org/10.1037/t53197-000
Świtała I. M. (2019). “Wychowanie do wartości w zmieniającym się świecie,” Studia Edukacyjne, vol. 52, pp. 159–172, https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2019.52.11
Weir K. (2023). “Social Media Brings Benefits and Risks to Teens: Psychology Can Help Identify a Path Forward,” Monitor on Psychology, vol. 54, no. 6. American Psychological Association, https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/09/protecting-teens-on-social-media [accessed: 05.04.2025].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Małgorzata Przybysz-Zaremba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author declares that:
they are the author of the article (hereinafter referred to as the Work) and:
- is entitled to exclusive and unlimited copyright to the Work,
- is entitled to dispose of the copyrights to the Work.
The Author grants the Jesuit University Ignatianum in Cracow a free, non-exclusive, territorially unlimited license to use the Work in the following fields of exploitation:
- publishing the Work in paper, digital or magnetic form;
- multiplying the work by any method, without limiting the number of editions or copies;
- distribution of the work and its copies in any form, including marketing, sales, lending, and lease;
- placing the work in a computer memory;
- distribution of the work in information networks, including the Internet;
- public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the Work available to the public in such a manner that everyone could have access to it at a time and place chosen by themselves;
- within the scope of dependent rights to the Work, covering, in particular, the right to make necessary changes to the Work, resulting from editorial and methodical preparation, as well as to make translations of the Work into other languages.
The license right shall be transferred the moment of transfer of the Work to the Jesuit University Ignatianum in Cracow. The Jesuit University Ignatianum in Cracow is entitled to grant sub-licenses to the Work in terms of the right granted. The license shall be limited in time for a period of 15 years from the date it is granted.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 4
Number of citations: 0
