Humanities
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport

Improving Science Learning in Grade 8 through Ipsative Assessment: Insights from Action Research
  • Home
  • /
  • Improving Science Learning in Grade 8 through Ipsative Assessment: Insights from Action Research
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 29 (2026) /
  4. Pedagogy

Improving Science Learning in Grade 8 through Ipsative Assessment: Insights from Action Research

Authors

  • Sohaib Ullah Center for Studies of Education and Psychology of Ethnic Minorities in Southwest China, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China; https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6892-1858
  • Xin Liu Center For Studies of Education and Psychology of Ethnic Minorities in Southwest China, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5556-9945
  • Marwa Zaib Department of Education, University of Chitral, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/PPS.2026.29.68703

Keywords

Ipsative Assessment, Formative Assessment, Science Learning, Student Engagement, Reflective Practice

Abstract

Introduction: This action research aimed to explore the use of ipsative assessment as a strategy to enhance students' science learning. Conducted at a private school in District Lower Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, the study employed a qualitative action research design, focusing on teacher observation and reflective practice. The study involved 25 Grade 8 students, with science as a core subject. Ipsative assessment was used, where students compared their current performance with their previous achievements rather than with peers.

Objective: The main objective was to investigate the impact of ipsative assessment on students' learning outcomes, including their awareness of progress, engagement, motivation, and response to feedback.

Material and Method: Data were collected through classroom observations, teacher reflective journals, students' written work, and informal reflection discussions. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns related to students' learning progress and engagement.

Results:  The results indicated that ipsative assessment significantly increased students' awareness of their personal learning achievements. It also fostered greater participation in science classes. Feedback focused on improvement was positively received by students, enhancing their confidence and motivation. Reflective teaching practices enabled the teacher to identify learning gaps and adjust instructional strategies accordingly.

Conclusions: The research concluded that ipsative assessment is an effective formative tool that supports student-centered learning and improves science learning outcomes. The findings suggest that implementing ipsative assessment can enhance teaching quality and create a more engaging and motivating learning environment for students.

Author Biographies

Sohaib Ullah, Center for Studies of Education and Psychology of Ethnic Minorities in Southwest China, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China;

Postgraduate Scholar at Southwest University, majoring in Curriculum and Instruction.

Xin Liu, Center For Studies of Education and Psychology of Ethnic Minorities in Southwest China, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

Postgraduate Student, Majoring in Comparative Education

Marwa Zaib, Department of Education, University of Chitral, Pakistan

Master Student at University of Chitral, Pakistan

References

1. Osiesi MP. Educational evaluation: functions, essence and applications in primary schools’ teaching and learning. Society & Sustainability. 2020;2(2):1-9.

2. Clark I. Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational psychology review. 2012;24(2):205-49.

3. Zimmerman BJ. From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational psychologist. 2013;48(3):135-47.

4. Ullah S, Ullah A, Manirahari P. Understanding the Role of Madrassas in Pakistan’s Educational Landscape: A Data-Driven Perspective from Google Trends. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport. 2025;26:66269-.

5. Ismail SM, Rahul D, Patra I, Rezvani E. Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia. 2022;12(1):40.

6. Wu X-Y, Ng DTK, Chiu TK. Self-regulated learning with AI: A comparative analysis of General-Purpose and Task-Specific platforms. International Journal of Technology in Education. 2026;9(1):279-302.

7. Sharma GS. Assessment For Learning: AGPH Books| AG Publishing House; 2025.

8. Hanrahan M. The effect of learning environment factors on students’ motivation and learning. International journal of science education. 1998;20(6):737-53.

9. Ullah S, Ullah A, Zaib M. Assessing the Demand for Skill-based Education in Pakistan: Insights from Google Trends Data. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport. 2025;27:66462-.

10. Corcoran TB, Mosher FA, Rogat A. Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. 2009.

11. Crosby R. Using ipsative assessment to improve feedback quality and the student assessment experience in university computer science: Newcastle University; 2021.

12. Siregar T. Classroom action research-based learning innovations: Kemmis and McTaggart models. 2025.

13. Ullah S, Sikandar HM, Jihad A, Maaz M. AI in education, ChatGPT, and personalized learning: Measuring public attention in Pakistan through Google Trends. Culture, Education, and Future. 2025;3(3):391-404.

14. Nishizuka K. Significance and challenges of formative ipsative assessment in inquiry learning: a case study of writing activities in a “contemporary society” course in a Japanese high school. Sage Open. 2022;12(2):21582440221094599.

15. Lee I. Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. Canadian modern language review. 2007;64(1):199-213.

16. Schellekens LH, Bok HG, De Jong LH, Van der Schaaf MF, Kremer WD, Van der Vleuten CP. A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2021;71:101094.

17. Mulyana T, Kurniasih S, Ardianto D. Assessment for learning: changes in the role of assessment in learning. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research. 2021;2(5):580-9.

18. Kumar B. ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF TECHNIQUES AND OUTCOMES. Innovative Approaches to Multidisciplinary Exploration. 2025:33.

19. Alt D. Teachers’ practices in science learning environments and their use of formative and summative assessment tasks. Learning Environments Research. 2018;21(3):387-406.

20. Kotsis KT. Integrating inquiry-based learning in the new Greek primary science curriculum. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. 2024;5(6):63-71.

21. Haynes NM, Boudreaux MK, Gordon EW. A theory-informed and student-centered framework for comprehensive educational assessment. Handbook for Assessment in the Service of Learning. 2025;2.

22. Meškauskienė A, Guoba A. The impact of Assessment and Selfassessment methods of Learning achievements and Progress on adolescent self-esteem building. Pedagogika. 2016;124(4):160-71.

23. Nobutoshi M. Metacognition and reflective teaching: a Synergistic Approach to fostering critical thinking skills. Research and Advances in Education. 2023;2(9):1-14.

24. Fathi S. Opportunities and challenges of a concept-based approach in online education: a case study in secondary international education. 2024.

25. Hughes G. Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2011;36(3):353-67.

26. Namaziandost E, Behbahani HK, Naserpour A. Peer support in language learning: Mitigating anxiety, enhancing achievement, cultivating growth mindsets, and increasing enjoyment. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. 2024;7(2):296-313.

27. Ratnayake A, Bansal A, Wong N, Saseetharan T, Prompiengchai S, Jenne A, et al. All “wrapped” up in reflection: supporting metacognitive awareness to promote students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. 2024;25(1):e00103-23.

28. Krajcik JS, Czerniak CM. Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach: Routledge; 2018.

29. Capobianco BM, Feldman A. Promoting quality for teacher action research: Lessons learned from science teachers’ action research. Educational Action Research. 2006;14(4):497-512.

30. Correia CF, Harrison C. Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science & Technological Education. 2020;38(3):355-76.

31. Kukol A. Combination of Ipsative and Sociomaterial Assessment Methodologies within University-Level Science Education. Higher Education for the Future. 2024;11(2):220-34.

32. Majumdar A. Thematic analysis in qualitative research. Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis: IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2019. p. 197-220.

33. Limeri LB, Carter NT, Choe J, Harper HG, Martin HR, Benton A, et al. Growing a growth mindset: Characterizing how and why undergraduate students’ mindsets change. International Journal of STEM Education. 2020;7(1):35.

34. Black P, Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of personnel evaluation in education). 2009;21(1):5-31.

35. Abdullah MY, Bakar NRA, Mahbob MH. Student's participation in classroom: What motivates them to speak up? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;51:516-22.

36. Patterson K. A Qualitative Study About How Teacher Actions Increase Student Anxiety During High-stakes Testing: Northcentral University; 2019.

37. Wiliam D. What is assessment for learning? Studies in educational evaluation. 2011;37(1):3-14.

38. Narciss S, Sosnovsky S, Schnaubert L, Andrès E, Eichelmann A, Goguadze G, et al. Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education. 2014;71:56-76.

39. Sadler DR. Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;35(6):727-43.

Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

1.
ULLAH, Sohaib, LIU, Xin and ZAIB, Marwa. Improving Science Learning in Grade 8 through Ipsative Assessment: Insights from Action Research. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport. Online. 5 February 2026. Vol. 29, p. 68703. [Accessed 17 September 2026]. DOI 10.12775/PPS.2026.29.68703.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 29 (2026)

Section

Pedagogy

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Sohaib Ullah, Xin Liu, Marwa Zaib

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 360
Number of citations: 0

Most read articles by the same author(s)

  • Qinyi Tan, Xin Liu, Luyan Teng, Lei Fu, David Anim Mante, Using Baidu Index to Explore the Temporal Dynamics of Chinese Online Interest in the Thai Film Bad Genius , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 22 (2025)
  • Sohaib Ullah, Azmat Ullah, Marwa Zaib, Assessing the Demand for Skill-based Education in Pakistan: Insights from Google Trends Data , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 27 (2025)
  • Qinyi Tan, Xin Liu, Luyan Teng, Growing Online Interest in ERNIE Bot Released Since 2022: An Analysis of Baidu Index Data , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 25 (2025)
  • Sohaib Ullah, Azmat Ullah, Philogene Manirahari, Understanding the Role of Madrassas in Pakistan’s Educational Landscape: A Data-Driven Perspective from Google Trends , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 26 (2025)
  • Sohaib Ullah, Azmat Ullah, Marwa Zaib, Rising Interest in Foreign Scholarships in Pakistan: Evidence from Google Trends and the Brain Drain Debate , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 27 (2025)
  • Sohaib Ullah, Hafiz Muhammad Sikandar, Abbas Jihad, Muhammad Maaz, Mr. Global Interest in Physical Education Curriculum: A Google Trends Analysis from 2015 to 2025 , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 23 (2025)

Similar Articles

  • Celina Łepecka-Klusek, Anna Bogusława Pilewska-Kozak, Grażyna Stadnicka, Klaudia Pałucka, Cigarette smoking in pregnancy , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016)
  • Alicja Banaczkowska, Jerzy Eksterowicz, Walery Zukow, Traditional Kitchen as a factor in the development of tourism in the region as an example Krajna , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016)
  • I. M. Khomenko, N. V. Zakladnaya, Evaluation of health status of adult population in the observation area of Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016)
  • Ajvaz Berisha, Afrim Koca, Kushtrim Berisha, Application of taxonomy analysis in selection of young sportsman in karate and football , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019)
  • Diana Słota, Tadeusz Paweł Wasilewski, Mariusz Goniewicz, Klaudia Długoborska, The quality of life of patients with nephrolithiasis after the endourological removal of calculi from the urinary tract , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019)
  • Mohammad Saeid Kiani, Leila Nazari, Studying the impact of professional constraints and challenges on job well-being and employee motivation in sports clubs during the COVID-19 pandemic , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 21 (2025)
  • Zhan Huang, Xiaoling Huang, Intergroup Contacting in Sports: Chinese Wisdom in Strengthening Community Awareness , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 25 (2025)
  • Ivan Badyin, Olena Gozhenko, Anatoliy Gozhenko, Walery Zukow, Technology of Activation of Regenerative Rehabilitation: Mechanisms and Neuroendocrine Modulation - A Narrative Review , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 25 (2025)
  • Hanna Pavlega, Olena Gozhenko, Anatoliy Gozhenko, Walery Zukow, Sexual dimorphism of some parameters in healthy control and patients with ischemic heart disease, arterial hypertension and their comorbidity , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 26 (2025)
  • Chenyu Wang, Chuanqiushui Wang, Xuemei Wu, Jiong Luo, The Impact of Tai Chi Exercise on Sleep Quality in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport: Vol. 26 (2025)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Search

Search

Browse

  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Ipsative Assessment, Formative Assessment, Science Learning, Student Engagement, Reflective Practice
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop