Intergroup Contacting in Sports: Chinese Wisdom in Strengthening Community Awareness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PPS.2025.25.64775Keywords
Intergroup Contact Theory, Sport Function, Community Awareness, Chinese WisdomAbstract
With the evolution of globalization and the intensification of the challenge of anti-globalization, the national community and the community with a shared future for mankind are facing unprecedented challenges. Sports activities carry material and spiritual culture through physical practice, and on the basis of meeting the optimal conditions for intergroup contact, it is a powerful means of intergroup contact to build direct and indirect scenes of intergroup interaction. In China, sports promote cultural contacts between people of all ethnic groups in the Chinese nation in direct and indirect ways through their intergroup contacts, stimulate the emotional resonance of the Chinese nation, build a space for exchanges and integration of people of all ethnic groups through sports events, forge a sense of community of the Chinese nation, and build a stage of a community with a shared future for mankind that connects the world in this way. In response to the major changes in the world unseen in a century and strengthening the sense of community, all sports subjects should optimize the scene embedding mechanism of intergroup contact, improve the emotional connection efficiency of sports ceremonies, strengthen the driving force of sports events on cultural exchanges and exchanges, give full play to the role of sports in intergroup contact, forge a sense of community internally and externally, strengthen the sense of community with a shared future for mankind externally, promote the great unity of the people of the world, and respond to global challenges and risks.
References
Castles, S., & Davidson, A. (2000). Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003061595
Milberg, W., Liess, T., & Tedesco, M. (2024). Globalization after De-globalization. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 91(3), 939-971. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sor.2024.a938583
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice(in:)Evaluation of Programs. Addison-Wesley.
Brenneman, L. (2017). You had to be there : extending intergroup contact theory to positive contexts through a participant-centered analysis of fans’ experiences at the Olympics. ProQuest LLC.
Schulenkorf, N., & Sherry, E. (2021). Applying intergroup contact theory to sport-for-development. Sport Management Review, 24(2), 250-270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.08.004
Ekici, H., Ibanoglu, E., Öztürk H., et al. (2021). Sports for Improving Intergroup Relations Among Adolescents: An Intervention Study in Turkey. Journal of Peace Psychology, 27(2), 309-313. doi: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000490
Chen, J., & Zuo, B. (2004).On Intergroup Contact Theory. Psychological Exploration, 1(1), 74-78.
Hong, Y., & Liu, B. C. (2012). Development and Adoption of Contact Theory in National Education. Journal of Northeast Normal
University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 4(4), 214-217. doi: 10.16164/j.cnki.22-1062/c.2012.04.070
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274. doi: 10.1177/1368430210390533
Crisp, R. J., Stathi, S., Turner, R. N., & Husnu, S. (2009). Imagined intergroup contact: Theory, paradigm and practice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00230.x
Xiong, H. (2024). Body, Society, and Sport. Social Sciences Academic Press(China).
Li, Q. L., Li, W. Y., & Xiong, B. (2022). Mechanism and Path of Deepening National Unity Progress Education Under the Intergroup Contact Theory. Heilongjiang National Series, 5(5), 34-40. doi: 10.16415/j.cnki.23-1021/c.2022.05.017.
International Olympic Committee. (2025). 0lympic-Charter. https://olympics.com/ioc/documents/international-olympic-committee/olympic-charter (accessed: 2025.08.07)
The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China. (2022). Sports Law of the People's Republic of China. People's Publishing House.
Yu, Y. H. (2019). Theoretical System and Policy Thinking of the National Fitness and Healthy China. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 42(2), 25-35. doi:10.19582/j.cnki.11-3785/g8.2019.02.004.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1177/009430610903800250
Zhao, F., Liu, C. S., & Xie, X.J. (2025). Research on Strengthening of Chinese National Identity through Festival Sports from Perspective of Threshold Theory: A Field Survey of Guangxi Sanjiang Flower Cannon Festival. Journal of Wuhan Sports University, 59(2), 61-68. doi: 10.15930/j.cnki.wtxb.2025.02.009.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of The Judgement of Taste. Routledge. doi: 10.17323/1726-3247-2005-3-25-48
Bendix, J., & Kertzer, D. I.(1989). Ritual, politics, and power. American Political Science Review, 83(2), 615. doi: 10.2307/1962414
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zhan Huang, Xiaoling Huang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 156
Number of citations: 0