Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review)

Representation of Women’s Citizenship Activity in the Polish-language Media Discourse. Around the Case of Tomato Soup and van Gogh
  • Home
  • /
  • Representation of Women’s Citizenship Activity in the Polish-language Media Discourse. Around the Case of Tomato Soup and van Gogh
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 42 (2023): Educational Studies Review (Women in Education. Women about Education) /
  4. Original research projects

Representation of Women’s Citizenship Activity in the Polish-language Media Discourse. Around the Case of Tomato Soup and van Gogh

Authors

  • Violetta Kopińska Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5255-9995

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2023.016

Keywords

citizenship participation, citizenship activity, women’s citizenship activity, gender, sexism, Poland, Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

The aim of the article is to reconstruct the discursive representation of women’s citizenship activity based on the media description and comments in Polish language, referring to the event of October 14th, 2022, organised by Just Stop Oil coalition at the National Gallery in London. The research material covered various genres: articles/information published on the Internet, posts on social media (Facebook), and comments on articles/posts. In total, 70 articles/posts and 3,830 comments were analysed. For the analysis, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in the approach represented by Ruth Wodak and Martin Reisigl was used (Reisigl & Wodak, 2005; Wodak, 2001). The study material sought for applications of discursive strategies (nomination, predication, argumentation, perspectivation, intensification/mitigation) in relation to the act itself and to the social female actors involved in this act. The results show, among others, that the discourse on citizenship activity reconstructed on the basis of the analyses carried out builds many symbolic boundaries that “arrange” the evaluation and the argumentation accompanying it. The features and properties attributed to social female actors, explicitly negatively valued, obscure the act itself, questioning its meaning as a result. On the other hand, the “explanatory,” “ironic” discourse and the discourse of indignation cannot cross the border between private and public spheres at the level of argumentation.

References

Abowitz, K.K., & Harnish, J. (2006). Contemporary discourses of citizenship. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 653–690, doi: 10.3102/00346543076004653.

Amna, E., & Ekman, J. (2014). Standby citizens: diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 261–281, doi: 10.1017/S175577391300009X.

Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for Belonging – An Analytical Framework. Geography Compass, 4(6), 644–659, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00317.x.

Banaji, S. (2020). Introduction. In: Youth Active Citizenship in Europe (pp. 1–36). Springer International Publishing, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-35794-8_1.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London–Newbury Park–New Dehli: SAGE Publications.

Cela, E. (2015). Gender and Citizenship Models: Reflections from Feminist Literature. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s5p109.

Dalton, R.J. (2008). Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x.

Healy, M. (2020). The Other Side of Belonging. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(2), 119–133, doi: 10.1007/s11217-020-09701-4.

Hoskins, B. (2006). A framework for the creation of indicators on active citizenship and education and training for active citizenship. Luxembourg: Ispra, Joint Research Centre.

Hoskins, B., & Kerr, D. (2012). Final Study Summary and Policy Recommendations. Participatory Citizenship in the European Union Institute of Education. Southampton: University of Southampton Education School.

Hoskins, B., Saisana, M., & Villalba, C.M.H. (2015). Civic Competence of Youth in Europe: Measuring Cross National Variation Through the Creation of a Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research, 123(2), 431–457, doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0746-z.

Jones, O. (2022, October 22). Why We Threw Soup At Van Gogh. YouTube. https://youtu.be/sr_KyGYTGN8.

Just Stop Oil. (2022, October 14). Just Stop Oil Supporters Choose Life Over Art. Facebook. https://fb.watch/j0ktwK3fi8/.

Kopińska, V. (2017). Krytyczna analiza dyskursu – podstawowe założenia, implikacje, zastosowanie [Critical Discourse Analysis – Basic Assumptions, Implications, Application]. Rocznik Andragogiczny, 23, 311, doi: 10.12775/RA.2016.016.

Kopińska, V. (2019). Szkoła jako miejsce edukacji antyobywatelskiej [School as a Place of Anti-Citizenship Education]. In: K. Szafraniec (Ed.), Młodzi 2018: Cywilizacyjne wyzwania, edukacyjne konieczności [Youth 2018: Civilizational Challenges, Educational Necessities], (1st ed., pp. 149–161). Warszawa: A PROPOS Serwis Wydawniczy Anna Sikorska-Michalak.

Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-middle Class. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195, doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.

Mascheroni, G. (2017). A Practice-Based Approach to Online Participation: Young People’s Participatory Habitus as a Source of Diverse Online Engagement. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4630–4651.

National Gallery [@NationalGallery]. (2022, October 14). Statement from the National Gallery [tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/NationalGallery/status/1580880525824122880.

Pateman, C. (1989). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pirk, R., & Nugin, R. (2016). Multiple Faces of Conventional Political Activism: A Youth Council Case Study. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 8(2), 81–100.

Rancew-Sikora, D., & Konopka, A. (2020). Potencjał sieciowej analizy dyskursu w badaniu debat o klimacie [The Potential of Discourse Network Analysis In the Research on Climate Debates]. Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica, 21(4), 22–35. https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/maes/article/view/6419/5651.

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2005). Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9780203993712.

Siim, B. (2000). Gender and Citizenship. Politics and Agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sveningsson, M. (2016). ‘I Wouldn’t Have What It Takes.’ YOUNG, 24(2), 139–156, doi: 10.1177/1103308815603305.

Vromen, A., Xenos, M.A., & Loader, B. (2015). Young people, social media and connective action: from organisational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 80–100, doi: 10.1080/13676261.2014.933198.

Werbner, P., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1999). Introduction: : Women and the New Discourse of Citizenship. In: Women, Citizenship and Difference (pp. 1–38). London: Zed Books.

Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA Is About – A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–13). London: SAGE Publications, doi: 10.4135/9780857028020.n1.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, doi: 10.4135/9780857028020.

Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the Politics of Belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214, doi: 10.1080/00313220600769331.

Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review)

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

1.
KOPIŃSKA, Violetta. Representation of Women’s Citizenship Activity in the Polish-language Media Discourse. Around the Case of Tomato Soup and van Gogh. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review). Online. 19 December 2023. No. 42, pp. 77-102. [Accessed 2 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/PBE.2023.016.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 42 (2023): Educational Studies Review (Women in Education. Women about Education)

Section

Original research projects

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Violetta Kopińska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 286
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

citizenship participation, citizenship activity, women’s citizenship activity, gender, sexism, Poland, Critical Discourse Analysis
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop