Sex and country related specificity of readiness for aggression among adolescents
Keywordsreadiness for aggression, emotional-impulsive readiness (E – IR), habitual- -cognitive readiness (H – CR) and personality-imminent readiness (P – IR)
Readiness for aggression is defined as a set of psychological processes and structures that regulate (underlie) aggressive manifestations. It is reasonable to identify three main classes of such mechanisms: emotional-impulsive readiness (E – IR), habitual-cognitive readiness (H – CR) and personality-imminent readiness (P – IR). Readiness for aggression was diagnosed by a psychometrically verified inventory, The Readiness for Interpersonal Aggression Inventory (RIAI; Frączek, Konopka, Smulczyk, 2008). The study was run on 984 students (534 males and 450 females) from Poland, China, Spain and Uruguay, mean age 16,53. The analyses yielded the following findings: boys manifested significantly higher level of H – CR and P – IR then girls find it is true for every country. At the same time girls manifested significantly higher indicator of E – IR than boys, but only in case of Poland and Uruguay. It seems that both sex-related roles and nationality are to some extend related to manifested level of differences in a level of measured forms of readiness for interpersonal aggression.
Bem S. L. (2000), Męskość, kobiecość. O różnicach wynikających z płci, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
Bem S. L. (1981), Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing, “Psychological Review”, 88 (4), s. 354–364.
Bjorkqvist K. (1994), Sex differences in physical, verbal and indirect aggression. A review of recent research, “Sex Role”, 30, s. 177–184, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF01420988.
Bjorkqvist K., Lagerspetz K. M. J., Kaukiainen A. (1992), Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in Regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression, “Aggressive Behavior”, 18, s. 117– 127, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<117: :AID-AB2480180205>3.0.CO;2-3.
Deaux K. (1985), Sex and Gender, “Annual Review of Psychology”, 36, s. 49–81, DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.36.1.49.
Eagly A. H., Steffen V. J. (1986), Gender and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature, “Psychological Bulletin”, 100 (3), s. 309–330, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.100.3.309.
Frączek A. (2010), The nature an patterns of readiness for aggression – conceptual considerations, Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence, Vilnius, Lithuania, 12–5 May.
Frączek A. (2008), Concept and Categories of Readiness for Interpersonal Aggression (theoretical considerations), Paper presented at the XIII Workshop Aggression. Potsdam, Germany, 6–8 November.
Frączek A., Konopka K., Smulczyk M. (2008), Measurement of Psychological Mechanisms of Aggressive Behavior (Assumptions and Instrument), Poster presented at CICA – STR International Conference on Aggression, Terrorism and Human Rights. Zakopane, Poland, 15–18 July.
Frączek A. (2002), O naturze i formowaniu się psychologicznej regulacji agresji interpersonalnej, w: Kurcz I., Kądzielawa D. (red.) Psychologia czynności. Nowe perspektywy, s. 45–64.
Konopka K. (2008), Sex and Sex Role Identification (Gender) as Concomitances of Patterns of Regulatory Mechanism of Aggressive Behavior, Poster presented at 18th ISRA World Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 8–13 July.
Ramirez J. M. (1990), Similarities in Attitudes Toward Interpersonal Aggression in Finland, Poland and Spain, “The Journal of Social Psychology”, 131 (5), s. 737–739, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1991.9924656.
Smulczyk M. (2008), Functions of Emotional Reactivity and Perseverativeness in Intrapsychic Mechanisms of Interpersonal Aggression, Poster presented at 18th ISRA World Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 8–13 July.
How to Cite
Number of views and downloads: 17
Number of citations: 0