Natural Science – an Enemy or an Ally of Theodicy?
Some Methodological Remarks inspired by St. Thomas Aquinas’ Natural Theology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TiCz.2023.015Keywords
theodicy, natural science, methodology, metaphysicsAbstract
Since the emergence of modern scientific revolution two opposing trends have appeared which attempted to use the hypotheses formulated on the basis of the dynamically developing natural science. The first of them focuses not only on questioning the truths of revealed faith relying on the results of natural science but also on demonstrating the groundlessness of the conclusions reached before by purely rational reflection which indicated the existence of the Absolute Being within the framework of theodicy. In the case of the second trend, there are attempts to interpret selected scientific discoveries as a confirmation of the truths contained in supernatural Revelation, or to use them as premises on the basis of arguments proposed by theodicy. St. Thomas Aquinas who was able to combine revealed knowledge with the scientific knowledge of his time, creating their integral synthesis is frequently mentioned in this respect to justify the rightness of this aspiration. The article addresses several methodological questions which provide a more ordered approach to the aforementioned issues relying on the model proposed by the Angelic Doctor.
References
Aquinas, Thomas. 2019. Summa Contra Gentiles, Books I&II, Latin-English Opera Omnia. Translated by A. Pegis, J. F. Anderson, V. J. Bourke, and C. J. O’Neil. Edited by The Aquinas Institute.
Aquinas, Thomas. 2009. The Summa Theologiae: Latin-English Edition, Prima Pars, Q. 1–64. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Edited by NovAntiqua.
Aquinas, Thomas. 2017. On Being and Essence. Translated by J. Bobik. Edited by Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1987. Faith, Reason, and Theology. Questions I–IV of his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius (Expositio Super Librum Boethii De Trinitate). Translated by A. Maurer. Edited by Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, Toronto.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1986. The Divisions and Methods of the Sciences. Questions V and VI of his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius (Expositio Super Librum Boethii De Trinitate). Translated by A. Maurer. Edited by Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, Toronto.
Aristotle. 2002. Metaphysics. Translated by J. Sachs. Edited by Green Lion Press.
Benedict XVI. The Spiritual Testament. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2022-12/the-spiritual-testament-of-pope-emeritus-benedict-xvi.html.
Bronk, Andrzej. 1998. Religia i nauka. In Zrozumieć świat współczesny. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, pp. 203–256.
Dodds, Michael. 2012. Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.
Gilson, Etienne. 1996. Bóg i ateizm. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Hajduk, Zygmunt. 2000. Ogólna metodologia nauk. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL.
Hankey, Wayne J. 1982. The Place of the Proof for God’s Existence in the Summa Theologiae of Thomas Aquinas.The Tomist 46/3(1982), pp. 370–393.
Moskal, Piotr. 2008. Religia i prawda. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
John Paul II. 1998. Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio on the Relationship Between Faith and Reason.
Jones, Steve E. 2011. A Brief Summary of Sir Isaac Newton’s Religious Views. In Converging Paths to Truth: The Summerhays Lectures on Science and Religion. Ed. Michael Rhodes and J. Ward Moody. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, pp. 59–75.
Kamiński, Stanisław. 1998. O sposobie poznania Boga. In Światopogląd –religia – teologia. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, pp. 179–204.
Kotowski, Mateusz. 2018. Argumenty z autorytetu a krytyczne myślenie. W nawiązaniu do Logiki i argumentacji Andrzeja Kisielewicza. Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia XIII 3(2018), pp. 77–93.
Kretzmann, Norman. 2001. The Metaphysics of Theism. Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leo XIII. 1879. Encyclical Aeterni Patris on the Restoration of Christian Philosophy.
Levering, Matthew. 2016. Proofs of God: Classical Arguments from Tertulian to Barth. Grand Rapids: Baker Academics.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej. 1994. Tomizm. Dla-czego? Lublin: „Żyć i poznawać”.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej. 1998. 1999. Zeszyty z metafizyki vol. 1–3. Lublin: Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu.
Mullins, Andy. 2022. Rationality and Human Fulfilment Clarified by a Thomistic Metaphysics of Participation. Scientia et Fides vol. 10, n. 1, pp. 177–195.
Pedersen. Olaf 2016. Dwie księgi. Z dziejów relacji między nauką a teologią. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
Perkinson, Henry. 1978. Popper’s Fallibilism. ETC: A Review of General Semantics vol. 35, n. 1, pp. 5–19.
Stróżewski, Władysław. 2003. Ontologia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Aureus, Wydawnictwo Znak.
Swieżawski, Stefan. 2002. Święty Tomasz na nowo odczytany. Poznań: W drodze.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tomasz Dutkiewicz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 221
Number of citations: 0