Is Theology a Formal Science?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.020Keywords
theology, philosophy of science, formal sciences, empirical sciences, demarcation, logicAbstract
Discussion on the methodological status of theology is an attempt to answer whether theology can be considered a science, i.e., a source of knowledge. This debate has resulted in the formulation of three main positions. The first position argues that theology does not qualify as a science due to its failure to meet the strict criteria of demarcation. The second position asserts that theology is indeed a science, similar to any other discipline, and this perspective is endorsed by theologians themselves. The third position treats theology as a science, but one of a unique nature (sui generis). Furthermore, an idea has emerged suggesting that theology could be regarded as a formal science. Several arguments support this notion, including the operational rather than eidetic nature of the terms of theological discourse, the employment of assumptions and the drawing of conclusions within theology, the exclusive focus on textual analysis, and the application of a coherence theory of truth. This paper engages in a discussion with the presented arguments and endeavours to demonstrate their incorrectness. The purpose of positioning theology among the formal sciences is to defend its scientific status against scholars who hold atheistic or anti-theological world views. However, this “defence” comes at a high price, as it entails depriving theology of its fundamental aim, which is to formulate statements about reality.
References
Bocheński, Józef Maria. 1990. Logika religii. Warszawa: Pax.
Bocheński, Józef Maria. 1993. „O analogii.” W tenże, Logika i filozofia. Wybór pism, 50–98. Warszawa: PWN.
Bocheński, Józef Maria. 1992. Współczesne metody myślenia. Poznań: W drodze.
Bokwa, Ignacy, red. 2007. Breviarium fidei: Wybór doktrynalnych wypowiedzi Kościoła. Poznań: Księgarnia Świętego Wojciecha.
Bronk, Andrzej i Majdański, Stanisław. 2006. „Teologia – próba metodologiczno-epistemologicznej charakterystyki.” Nauka 2: 81–110.
Chrostowski, Waldemar. 2020. „Geneza Wulgaty i jej aktualny status w Kościele katolickim. Uwagi na marginesie Listu apostolskiego papieża Franciszka «Scripturae Sacrae affectus».” Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana 36: 9–35. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18276/cto.2020.36-01.
Crisp, Oliver D. and Rea, Michael C. 2009. Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crisp, Oliver D. 2009. „On Analytic Theology.” In Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology, edited by O. D. Crisp and M. C. Rea, 33–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deer, Donald S. 2001. „Proces formowania się Biblii.” W Międzynarodowy komentarz do Pisma Świętego, red. William R. Farmer i in., 147–156. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Księży Werbistów.
de Vaux, Roland. 1971. Histoire ancienne d'Israel: des origines a l'installation en Canaan. Paris: J. Gabalda et Cie.
Farmer, William R. 2001. „Kanon Ewangelii Kościoła.” W: Międzynarodowy komentarz do Pisma Świętego, red. William R. Farmer i in., 1126–1130. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Księży Werbistów.
Homerski, Józef. 1973. Wstęp ogólny do Pisma Świętego. Poznań–Warszawa: Pallottinum.
Ingarden, Roman. 1988. O dziele literackim. Warszawa: PWN.
Ingarden, Roman. 1961. Spór o istnienie świata, t. 2. Warszawa: PWN.
Jaworski, Krzysztof. 2021. „Sformalizowana analogia proporcjonalności w ujęciu Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego i jej zastosowanie w dyskursie religijnym.” Filozofia Nauki 29: 63–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0006.
Judycki, Stanisław. 2020. Epistemologia, t. 2. Poznań–Warszawa: W drodze.
Kamiński, Stanisław. 1998. Nauka i metoda. Pojęcie nauki i klasyfikacja nauk. Lublin: TN KUL.
Kiczuk, Stanisław. 2003. „O logice nieformalnej.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 51: 143–169.
Lakatos, Imre. 1995. Pisma z filozofii nauk empirycznych. Warszawa: PWN.
Levoratti, Armando J. 2001. „Interpretacja Pisma Świętego.” W Międzynarodowy komentarz do Pisma Świętego, red. William R. Farmer i in., 10–34. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Księży Werbistów.
McDowell, Josh. 2002. Przewodnik apologetyczny. Warszawa: Vocatio.
Rahner, Karl. 1987. Podstawowy wykład wiary. Warszawa: PAX.
Rea, Michael C. 2009. „Introduction.” W Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology, red. Oliver D. Crisp and Michael C. Rea, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Remisiewicz, Łukasz. 2015. „Teologia jako nauka formalna.” Analiza i Egzystencja 32: 113–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2015.32-05.
Roszak, Piotr. 2015. „Dwie prędkości teologii? O celu, metodzie i perspektywach teologii analitycznej.” Teologia w Polsce 9 (2): 75–93.
Szlaga, Jan, red. 1986. Wstęp ogólny do Pisma Świętego. Poznań: Pallottinum.
Timpe, Kevin. 2015. „On Analytic Theology.” Scientia et Fides 3 (2): 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2015.01.
Tkaczyk, Marcin. 2015. Futura Contingentia. Lublin: KUL.
Węcławski, Tomasz. 2004. „Metodologia teologii.” Nauka 2: 101–120.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Krzysztof Jaworski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 754
Number of citations: 0