Educational challenges – selected preferences of citizens of rural areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/RA.2025.007Keywords
non-formal education, rural areas, adult learning, educational challengesAbstract
The presented research study focused on educational preferences in personal and social aspects, and in the context of the challenges of civilisation (including global climate change, environmental protection and the development of digital technologies). The survey of a nationwide population (1001 people) over 16 years of age, living in rural areas, addressed both formal and non-formal education (including the development of farming competences, the improvement of non-farming professional competences and enhancing digital skills), as well as learning skills development. The purpose of the survey was to find out the opinions of rural residents regarding educational challenges, the scope of education, educational innovations and the type of educational activities. A diagnostic survey was used in this study. The analysis was both quantitative (number of selected responses) and qualitative (diverse responses to open questions). The results of the study indicated the need to learn, as well as to improve metacompetence (learning skills), and to improve digital skills. Recognition of the importance of social learning was reflected in the emphasis on the need to organise groups with similar goals or interests, and people involved in similar activities. Respondents also considered the access to information and advisory support as an important help in choosing the right educational offer, and the need to facilitate cooperation within local communities. They also emphasized the importance of improving the skills of educators
References
Adam-Hernández A., Harteisen U. (2019), A proposed framework for rural resilience – how can peripheral village communities in Europe shape change?, „Rural Journal of Depopulation and Rural Development Studies”, nr 28, s. 7–42.
Babbie E.R. (2021), Badania społeczne w praktyce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Coffield F. (2004), Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review, Learning and Skills Research Centre, London.
Cresswell J.W. (2013), Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
Freire P. (2021), Pedagogy of hope, Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, London.
GUS (2024), Uczenie się osób dorosłych 2022, Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Urząd Statystyczny w Gdańsku, Warszawa–Gdańsk.
Habermas J. (2015), Teoria działania komunikacyjnego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Hicks S.R.C. (2016), Zrozumieć postmodernizm. Sceptycyzm i socjalizm od Rousseau do Foucaulta, Biblioteka Myśli Pedagogicznej, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy, Bydgoszcz.
Knowles M.S. (1984), Andragogy in action. Applying modern principles of adult education, CA: Jossey Bass San Francisco.
Kudełko J. (2023), Problemy i wyzwania rozwoju obszarów wiejskich, [w:] D. Rynio, A. Zakrzewska-Półtorak (red.), Przestrzeń i regiony w nowoczesnej gospodarce. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Stanisławowi Korenikowi, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, s. 247–258.
Kwieciński Z., Śliwerski B. (2019), Pedagogika. Podręcznik akademicki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Mathie R.G., Wals A.E.J. (2022), Whole school approaches to sustainability: exemplary practices from around the world, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
Meison D. (2022), Jakościowe metody badań społecznych. Podejście aplikacyjne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
MRiRW (2022), Plan Strategiczny dla Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej na lata 2023–2027, Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi, Warszawa.
Reupert A., Straussner S.L., Weimand B., Maybery D. (2022), It takes a village to raise a child: understanding and expanding the concept of the “village”, „Frontiers in Public Health”, nr 10, s. 1–7.
Strzemińska A., Wiśnicka M. (2011), Młodzież na wsi. Raport z badania, Pracownia Badań i Innowacji „Stocznia”, Warszawa.
Szempruch J. (2024), Kierunki zmian świata – implikacje dla edukacji i nauczyciela, [w:] J. Szempruch, A. Cybal-Michalska, M.J. Szymański, B. Śliwerski, Wyzwania i dylematy uspołecznienia edukacji, Impuls, Kraków, s. 15–54.
Tremble D. (2023), Andragogy vs pedagogy: which approach is best in the post-16 classroom?, https://www.sec-ed.co.uk/content/best-practice/andragogy-vs-pedagogy-which-approach-is-best-in-the-post-16-classroom [dostęp: 10.12.2024].
Zahavi D. (2012), Fenomenologia Husserla, WAM, Kraków.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marta Dobrzyniak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 288
Number of citations: 0