The Conformist Attitudes Scale (SPK-II). Latent Structure Analysis Using the Bi-Factor Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2021.014Keywords
conformity, adolescence, psychometric properties, latent structure, bi-factor modelAbstract
The aim of this article is to present the evaluation of psychometric properties of an original tool for measuring the propensity to adopt conformist attitudes in adolescents - the Conformist Attitudes Scale (SPK-II). The objective was achieved based on the results of exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analysis using a bi-factor model. Analyses were performed on a polychoric correlation matrix using the WLSMV estimator. The Geomin oblique rotation was used for the EFA. Data for the validation study were collected in Poland in 2012 and 2020 from 256 and 245 students aged 16-19, respectively. Of the solutions tested, the bi-factor model proved to be the best fit to the data (RMSEA= 0.052; CFI = 0.964; TLI = 0.953). Based on the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, coefficients omega (ω), and ECV, the scale was found to have high reliability. At the same time, the stability of the scale’s latent structure, its dimensionality and reliability were positively verified by comparing the estimates for the data from 2012 and 2020. The analyses conducted allowed the researchers to assume that the SPK-II latent factor structure model consists of a general factor and three subfactors. The subfactors correspond to subscales which measure specified attributes of a general propensity to adopt conformist attitudes: lack of self-confidence, submissiveness to others and passivity in expressing one’s own views.
The SPK-II fills a gap consisting in the absence of standardized research tools whose diagnostic spectrum is concerned with measuring the general propensity to adopt conformist attitudes in adolescents, taking into account attributes around which the conformity is focused. Its application enables studying conformity as an important adaptation mechanism in adolescence and predicting individual behaviour in various social situations related to participation in peer groups.
References
Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70, doi:10.1037/h0093718.
Bernacka, R.E. (2005). Osobowościowy mechanizm konformizmu i nonkonformizmu – specyfika
funkcjonowania i przejawy w zachowaniu [Personality Mechanism of Conformism and Non-Conformism – the Specificity of Operation and Manifestation in Behavior]. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 10(2), 73–82.
Cattell, R.B. (1948). Primary Personality Factors in the Realm of Objective Tests. Journal of Personality, 16(4), 459–486, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1948.tb02301.x.
Cialdini, R.B., & Goldstein, N.J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity and Compliance. In: D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. (pp. 151–192). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.
Dueber, D. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-Based Tool to Calculate Various Indices Relevant to Bifactor CFA Models. Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology Research Tools, doi:10.13023/edp.tool.01
Efferson, C., Lalive, R., Richerson, P., Mcelreath, R., & Lubell, M. (2008). Conformists and Mavericks: The Empirics of Frequency-Dependent Cultural Transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 56–64, doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.08.003.
Eriksson, K., & Coultas, J. C. (2009). Are People Really Conformist-Biased? An Empirical Test and a New Mathematical Model. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 5–21. doi:10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.3.
Fuligni, A.J., & Eccles, J.S. (1993). Perceived Parent-Child Relationships and Early Adolescents’ Orientation Toward Peers. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 622–632, doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.622.
Golino, H.F., & Epskamp, S. (2017). Exploratory Graph Analysis: A New Approach for Estimating the Number of Dimensions in Psychological Research. PLOS ONE, 12(6), e0174035, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174035.
Gough, H.G., & Heilbrun, A.B. (1980). The Adjective Check List Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Haun, D.B.M., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Conformity to Peer Pressure in Preschool Children. Child Development, 82(6), 1759–1767, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01666.x.
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (1998). The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(4), 215–241.
Hornowska, E. (2005). Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka [Psychological Tests. Theory and Practice]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Kiesler, Ch.A. (1969). Group Pressure and Conformity. In: J. Mills (Ed.), Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 233–306). Ontario: Macmillan.
Kosten, P.A., Scheier, L.M., & Grenard, J.L. (2013). Latent Class Analysis of Peer Conformity: Who Is Yielding to Pressure and Why? Youth & Society, 45(4), 565–590, doi: 10.1177/0044118X12454307.
Kroger, J. (2004). Identity in Adolescence: The Balance Between Self and Other. New Jork: Psychology Press.
Lönnqvist, J.-E., Leikas, S., Paunonen, S., Nissinen, V., & Verkasalo, M. (2006). Conformism Moderates the Relations Between Values, Anticipated Regret, and Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1469–1481, doi: 10.1177/0146167206291672.
MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99.
Meeus, W., Iedema, J., Maassen, G., & Engels, R. (2005). Separation-Individuation Revisited: On the Interplay of Parent-Adolescent Relations, Identity and Emotional Adjustment in Adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 28(1), 89–106, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.07.003.
Michel, M., & Opozda-Suder, S. (2019). Konformizm jako mechanizm wpływający na procesy relacyjne i adaptacyjne w grupie rówieśniczej. Analiza porównawcza wśród dostosowanych i niedostosowanych społecznie adolescentów – pełno- i niepełnosprawnych intelektualnie [Conformism as a Mechanism Affecting Relational and Adaptive Processes in a Peer Group. Comparative Analysis Among Socially Adjusted and Maladjusted Adolescents – With and Without Intellectual Disabilities]. Resocjalizacja Polska, (18), 129–148, doi:10.22432/pjsr.2019.18.08.
Mika, S. (1972). Wstęp do psychologii społecznej [Introduction to Social Psychology]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Moqrin, A.J.A.A. (2016). Children’s Conformity: The Child’s Age and Level of Privacy. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(4), 188–193.
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2019). Mplus. Statistical Analysis With Latent Variables. User’s Guide, 8th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.
Paszkiewicz-Sokołowska, J. (1972). Konformizm i nonkonformizm jako wartości [Conformism and Nonconformism as Values]. Studia Socjologiczne, (12), 169–182.
Popek, S. (2008). Kwestionariusz twórczego zachowania KANH [Creative Behaviour Questionnaire KANH]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu M. Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Reise, S.P., Bonifay, W.E., & Haviland, M.G. (2013). Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140, doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437.
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S.P., & Haviland, M.G. (2016a). Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237, doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249.
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S.P., & Haviland, M.G. (2016b). Evaluating Bifactor Models: Calculating and Interpreting Statistical Indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150, doi: 10.1037/met0000045.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(1), 1–36, doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Sanaria, A. (2004). Conformity and Norms: The Individual Perspective. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Santor, D.A., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V. (2000). Measuring Peer Pressure, Popularity, and Conformity in Adolescent Boys and Girls: Predicting School Performance, Sexual Attitudes, and Substance Abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(2), 163–182, doi: 10.1023/A:1005152515264.
Tyszkiewicz, A. (1998). Żeby chcieli chcieć. Problematyka konformizmu w teoriach zachowań i stosunków społecznych [That They Want to Want. The Issue of Conformism in Theories of Behaviour and Social Relations]. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Stosowanych Nauk Społecznych.
Urban, B. (2012). Agresja młodzieży i odrzucenie rówieśnicze [Youth Aggression and Peer Rejection]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Whiten, A., Horner, V., & de Waal, F.B.M. (2005). Conformity to Cultural Norms of Tool Use in Chimpanzees. Nature, 437(7059), 737–740, doi: 10.1038/nature04047.
Wysocka, E. (2013). Wschodząca dorosłość a tożsamość młodego pokolenia – współczesne zagrożenia dla kształtowania tożsamości. Analiza teoretyczna i empiryczne egzemplifikacje [Emerging Adulthood Versus the Identity of a Young Generation – Contemporary Threats to Shaping the Identity. A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Exemplification]. Colloquium Wydziału Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych AMW, 1, 69–96.
Zwaan, M., Dijkstra, J.K., & Veenstra, R. (2013). Status Hierarchy, Attractiveness Hierarchy and Sex Ratio: Three Contextual Factors Explaining the Status–Aggression Link Among Adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(3), 211–221, doi: 10.1177/0165025412471018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 1378
Number of citations: 0
