Underrepresented and Excluded from the Public Sphere: Women of Solidarity in Polish History Textbooks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2023.013Abstract
The paper aims to analyze the Solidarity movement’s textbook narratives, focusing on women’s representation in the history textbooks used in upper-secondary schools between 1991-2018. Quantitative methods were used to measure different categories of historical figures (men/women) in terms of their frequency and textual space. To explore the values and ideologies embedded in the textbook narratives of Solidarity, the study was guided by the qualitative approach and the critical discourse analysis of both verbal and visual texts. Women consequently remain outside the historical narrative of Solidarity as a marginalized group. Stereotypical images and underrepresentation of women in history textbooks provide a distorted version of social reality, acknowledging that political and social activism belongs to the public sphere occupied by men. Moreover, it reproduces the view that women do not belong to the public sphere and cannot be leaders because they are positioned in the private sphere. From the perspective of citizenship education, such a strand reproduces or/and reinforces social inequalities.
References
Arendt, H. (2000). Kondycja ludzka [Human Condition]. Warszawa: Aletheia.
Arnot, M. (2005). Gender Equality and Citizenship Education. Journal of Social Science Education, 2, 284–362.
Ash, T.G. (1983). The Polish Revolution: Solidarity 1980–82. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.
Bagdasarova, N., & Marchenko, L. (2017). Resurfaced and Disappearing Past: National Heroes in History Textbooks of Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. In: J. Zajda, T. Tsyrlina-Spady, & M. Lovorn (Eds.), Globalisation and Historiography of National Leaders Symbolic Representations in School Textbooks (pp. 229–260). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bernard-Powers, J. (2008). Feminism and Gender in Education for Citizenship and Democracy. In: J. Arthur, I. Davies, & C. Hahn (Eds.), Education for Citizenship and Democracy (pp. 314–328). London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In: J.G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Brzozowski, A., & Szczepański, G. (2012). Historia. Ku współczesności [History Towards the Present]. Warszawa: Stentor.
Chia, T.T. (2012). History education for nation building and state formation: The case of Singapore. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 191–207, doi: 10.1386/ctl.7.2.191_1.
Chmura-Rutkowska, I., Głowacka-Sobiech, E., & Skorzyńska, I. (2015). Niegodne historii? O nieobecności i stereotypowych wizerunkach kobiet w świetle podręcznikowej narracji historycznej w gimnazjum [‘Unworthy of History’? On the Absence and Stereotypical Images of Women in Light of the Historical Narrative in Middle School Text-books]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Cremin, H. (2012). Citizenship, inclusion, gender and young people. In: J. Arthur, H. Cremin (Eds.), Debates in Citizenship Education. Routledge:London.
Dolecki, R., Gutowski, K., & Smoleński, J. (2018). Historia. Po Prostu [History]. Warszawa: WSiP.
Durrani, N.A. et al. (2022). ‘The Fearful Khan and the Delightful Beauties’: The Construction of Gender in Secondary School Textbooks in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 2–17, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102508.
Dzido, M. (2016). Kobiety Solidarności [Women of Solidarity]. Warszawa: Świat Książki.
Earles, J. (2017). Reading Gender: A Feminist, Queer Approach to Children’s Literature and Children’s Discursive Agency. Gender and Education, 29(3), 369–388, doi: 10.1080/09540253.2016.1156062.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In: T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Sussex: The Harvester Press.
Garlicki, A. (2002). Historia 1939–2001 [History 1939–2001]. Warszawa: Scholar.
Green, B. (1986). Reading reproduction theory: on the ideology and education debate. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 6(2), 1–31.
Habermas, J. (2008). Strukturalne przeobrażenia sfery publicznej [The Structural Transformation of Public Sphere]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Hildebrant-Wypych, D. (2017). Religious Nation or National Religion: Poland’s Heroes and the (Re)Construction of National Identity in History Textbooks. In: J. Zajda et al. (Eds.), Globalisation and Historiography of National Leaders Symbolic Representations in School Textbooks (pp. 103–121). Dordrecht: Springer.
Janmaat, J. (2007). The Ethnic ‘Other’ in Ukrainian History Textbooks: The Case of Russia and the Russians. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(3), 307–324, doi: 10.1080/03057920701330180.
Kenney, P. (1999). The Gender of Resistance in Communist Poland. American Historical Review, 104(2), 399–425, doi: 10.2307/2650371.
Keynes, M. (2020). History Education, Citizenship, and State Formation. In: T. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Historical Studies in Education (pp. 621–636). Singapore: Springer.
Kłaczkow, J., & Roszak, S. (2012). Poznać przeszłość [Know the Past]. Warszawa: Nowa Era.
Kłaczkow, J., & Zielińska, A. (2015). Zrozumieć przeszłość [Understand the Past]. Warszawa: Nowa Era.
Kochanowski, J., & Matusik, P. (2004). Człowiek i historia [Man and History]. Warszawa: WSiP.
Kozłowska, Z.T, Unger, I., & Zając, S. (2012). Historia. Poznajemy przeszłość [History. We Learn about the Past]. Toruń: SOP Oświatowiec.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London–New York: Routledge.
Krzemiński, I. (2013). Solidarność. Niespełniony projekt polskiej demokracji [Solidarność. An Uncompleted Project of Polish Democracy]. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Maciuszek J., Polak, M., & Świątkowska, N. (2019). Grammatical Gender Influences Semantic Categorization and Implicit Cognition in Polish. Front. Psychol. 10:2208, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02208.
Majewska, E. (2014). „Solidarność” i solidarność w perspektywie feministycznej. Od postmieszczańskiej sfery publicznej do solidarności globalnej [„Solidarność” and Solidarity in a Feminist Perspective. From Post‑bourgeois Public Sphere to the Global Solidarity]. Etyka, 48, 43–57, doi: 10.14394/etyka.844.
Martin, C.L., & Halverson, C.F. (1981). A Schematic Processing Model of Sex-Typing and Stereotyping in Children. Child Development, 52(4), 1119–1132, doi: 10.2307/1129498.
Michalski, M., & Napierała, A. (2016). Sfera prywatna w podręcznikach do historii i społeczeństwa dla szkoł ponadgimnazjalnych [The Private Sphere in the History and Civics Textbooks for the Upper Secondary Schools]. In: I. Chmura-Rutkowska et al. (Eds.), Gender w podręcznikach. Raport, t. 1 [Gender in the Textbooks. A Report. Vol. 1]. Warszawa: Fundacja Feminoteka.
Molyneux, M., Dey, A., Gatto, M.A.C., & Rowden, H. (2021). New Feminist Activism, Waves and Generations. Discussion Paper, No 4, Women United Nations.
O’Kelly, C.G. (1983). Gender role stereotypes in fine art: Content analysis of art history books. Qualitative Sociology, 6(2), 136–148.
Osler, A. (1994). Still Hidden from History? The Representation of Women in Recently Published History Textbooks. Oxford Review of Education, 20, 219–235, doi: 10.1080/0305498940200206.
Pankowicz, A. (1993). Historia. Polska i świat współczesny [History. Poland and the Contemporary World]. Warszawa: WSiP.
Penn, P. (2005). Solidarity’s Secret: The Women Who Defeated Communism in Poland. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pingel, F. (2010). UNESCO Guidebook on Textbook Research and Textbook Revision. Paris–Braunshweig: Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research.
Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate Citizenship. Private decisions and public dialogues. Washington: University of Washington Press.
Przybyliński, M. (2009). Poznać przeszłość [Know the Past]. Warszawa: Stentor.
Pytlińska, O., Markiewicz, M., & Wyroda, A. (2013). Historia i społeczeństwo [History and Society]. Warszawa: WSiP
Radziwiłł, A., & Roszkowski, W. (1994). Historia 1945–1990 [History 1945–1990]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Reading, A. (1992). Polish Women, Solidarity and Feminism. Houndmills: Macmillan.
Stola, D. (2012). Historia. Wiek XX [History. The 21st Century]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Stupica, B., & Cassidy, J. (2014). Priming as a Way of Understanding Children’s Mental Representations of the Social World. Developmental Review, 34(1), 77–91, doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.12.003.
Su, Y. (2007). Ideological Representations of Taiwan’s History: An Analysis of Elementary Social Studies Textbooks, 1978–1995. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(3), 205–237, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00383.x.
Szymczak, M. (2011). Kobiety w polskich programach i podręcznikach do nauczania historii dla szkoły średniej po drugiej wojnie światowej [Women in the Polish History Curricula and Textbooks for Secondary Edycation after II World War]. Zielona Gora: Uniwersytet Zielonogorski.
Taras, R. (1995). Consolidating Democracy in Poland. Boulder: Westview Press.
Trošt, T.P. (2019). Remembering the Good: Constructing the Nation Through Joyful Memories in School Textbooks in the Former Yugoslavia. Memory Studies, 12(1), 27–45, doi: 10.1177/ 1750698018811986.
Tusiewicz, R. (1999). Historia 1944–1993 [History 1944–1993]. Warszawa: WSiP.
UNESCO. (2020). A New Generation: 25 Years of Efforts for Gender Equality in Education. Gender Report of the Global Education Monitoring Report. Accessed 1, 2022. https://en.unesco.org/gemreport/2020genderreport.
Ustrzycki, J. (2012). Historia. Ciekawi świata [History. Curious about the World]. Gdynia: Operon.
Ustrzycki, J. (2015). Historia. Ciekawi świata [History. Curious about the World]. Gdynia: Operon.
Walczewska, S. (1999). Damy, rycerze i feministki. Kobiecy dyskurs emancypacyjny w Polsce [Ladies, Knights and Feminists. Women’s Emancipatory Discourse in Poland]. Krakow: „eFKa.”
Whorf, B.L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, F.J., & Bennet, L.B. (2016). The Progressive Era: How American History Textbooks’ Visuals Represent Women. Social Studies Research and Practice, 11(1), 124–135, doi: 10.1108/SSRP-01-2016-B0008.
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is About – a Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments. In: R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage Publications.
Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Cross-Disciplinary Inquiries. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15(1), 203–225, doi: 10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod.
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
Wrobel, J. (2003). Odnaleźć przeszłość [Finding the Past]. Warszawa: WSiP.
Zajda, J. (2007). The New History School Textbooks in the Russian Federation: 1992–2004. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(3), 291–306, doi: 10.1080/03057920701330164.
Zajda, J. (2009). Teachers and the Politics of History School Textbooks. In: L.J. Saha, & A.G. Dworkin (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching (pp. 373–387). New York: Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Daria Hejwosz-Gromkowska, Dobrochna Hildebrandt-Wypych
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 240
Number of citations: 0
