Activity Models in Late Adulthood. Educational Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2020.026Keywords
active ageing, successful ageing, learning in late adulthood, older people, ageingAbstract
Activity contained in the title is considered throughout the article as the context of learning in the course of everyday life.
Purpose: To compare the level in which three different sets of independent variables (three models) predict activity of elderly people in areas concerning: 1. Spirituality/Religion, 2.
External world and 3. Themselves. The elements of Model 1. are selected demographic variables and ‘Satisfaction with life’, ‘Feelings of loneliness’ and ‘Health problems’. Model 2.
extends this set by the variable ‘Wisdom’. Model 3. adds the variable ‘Subjective definitions of successful ageing’.
Method: Hierarchical regression analysis was used. Participants: 192 older adults from Poland, aged 60–92.
Results: Irrespective of the type of activity, the higher engagement of an elder person is accompanied by the increase of satisfaction with life. In the presented models, only one of the four analysed dimensions of wisdom appear to be essential – affective wisdom. Its level increases along with the engagement in building a harmony with the surrounding world and the development of one’s own spirituality. Formal education is a very important element of activity in the area of learning harmony with oneself: it has a slightly lower, but statistically significant importance, in the models of activity directed to the external world, and it has no significance in models based on spiritual/religious activity.
Conclusions: Model 1. best explains activity in the area of learning harmony with ourselves. Additional variables considered in models 2 and 3 do not contribute to the improvement of statistics regarding the adjustment of the regression model. The situation is different in the case of spiritual/religious activity. Model 3. significantly statistically improves the precision of predicting the level of this type of activity. Model 2. seems to be most appropriate when it comes to prognosis of activity directed to the external world.
References
Ardelt, M. (2000a). Antecedents and Effects of Wisdom in Old Age: A Longitudinal Perspective on Aging Well. Research on Aging, 22(4), 360–394, doi: 10.1177/0164027500224003.
Ardelt, M. (2000b). Intellectual Versus Wisdom-Related Knowledge: The Case for a Different Kind of Learning in the Later Years of Life. Educational Gerontology, 26, 771–789, doi: 10.1080/036012700300001421.
Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical Assessment of a Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale. Research on Aging, 25,275-324, doi: 10.1177/0164027503025003004.
Ardelt, M. (2008). Self-Development Through Selflessness: The Paradoxical Process of Growing Wiser. In: H. A. Wayment, & J. J. Bauer (Eds.), Decade of Behavior. Transcending Self-Interest: Psychological Explorations of the Quiet Ego (pp. 221–233). American Psychological Association, doi: 10.1037/11771-020.
Borczyk, W., & Zacłona, Z. (2014). Profesjonalny Uniwersytet Trzeciego Wieku. Program edukacyjno-aktywizujący UTW. Wybrane zagadnienia [Professional University of the Third Age: Education and Activation Program: Selected Issues]. Nowy Sącz: Ogólnopolska Federacja Stowarzyszeń UTW.
Boudiny, K. (2013). ‘Active Ageing’: From Empty Rhetoric to Effective Policy Tool. Ageing and Society, 33, 1077–1098, doi:10.1017/ S0144686X1200030X.
Cernin, P.A., Lysak, C., & Lichtenberg P.A. (2011). A Comparison of Self-Rated and Objectively Measured Successful Aging Constructs in an Urban Sample of African American Older Adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 34, 89–102, doi: 10.1080/07317115.2011.539525.
Clayton, V. P., & Birren, J. E. (1980). The Development of Wisdom Across the Life Span: A Reexamination of an Ancient Topic. Life-Span Development and Behavior, 3, 103–135.
Czerniawska, O. (2000). Drogi i bezdroża andragogiki i gerontologii [Roads and Wilderness of Andragogy and Gerontology]. Łódź: WSHE.
Czerniawska, O. (2007). Szkice z andragogiki i gerontologii, [Drafts in Andragogy and Gerontology]. Łódź: WSHE.
Dillaway, H. E., & Byrnes, M. (2009). Reconsidering Successful Aging. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28, 702–722, doi: 10.1177/0733464809333882.
Dubas, E. (2000). Świat wewnętrzny jako przestrzeń życia człowieka [The Inner World as a Space of Human Life]. In: M. Dzięgielewska (Ed.), Przestrzeń życiowa i społeczna ludzi starszych [Living and Social Space of Older People], (pp.117–128). Łódź: Biblioteka Edukacji Dorosłych.
Dubas, E. (2016). Starość – darem, zadaniem i wyzwaniem. Rola aktywności i edukacji (wybrane wątki) [Old Age – a Gift, a Task and a Challenge. The Role of Activity and Education (Selected Issues)]. In: E. Dubas, & M. Muszyński (Eds.), Obiektywny i subiektywny wymiar starości [Objective and Subjective Dimension of Old Age], (pp. 233–246). Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ.
Erikson, E. H. (1982). The Life Cycle Completed. New York: Norton.
Fabiś, A. (2015). Rozwój duchowy jako atrybut dojrzałości w starości [Spiritual Development as an Atribute of the Maturity in an Old Age]. Biblioteka Gerontologii Społecznej, 1(9), 11–18.
Formosa, M. (2012). Critical Geragogy: Situating Theory in Practice. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 5, 36–54.
Foster, L., & Walker, A. (2015). Active and Successful Aging: A European Policy Perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 83–90. doi:10.1093/geront/gnu028.
Grossbaum, M. F., & Bates, G.W. (2002). Correlates of Psychological Well-Being at Midlife: The Role of Generativity, Agency and Communion, and Narrative Themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 120–127, doi: 10.1080/01650250042000654.
Grygiel, P., Humenny, G., Rebisz, S., Świtaj, P., & Sikorska, J. (2013). Validating the Polish Adaptation of the 11-item de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 129–139, doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000130.
Halicki, J. (2010). Obrazy starości rysowane przeżyciami seniorów [Images of Old Age Drawn by the Life Experience of Seniors]. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
Havighurst, R. J. (1963). Successful Aging. Processes of Aging: Social and Psychological Perspectives, 1, 299–320.
Jankowski, D. (2012). Edukacja i autoedukacja: współzależność, konteksty, twórczy rozwój [Education and Self-Education: Interdependence, Contexts, Creative Development]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Jarvis, P. (2006), Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Human Learning. London – New York: Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (2011). Teaching, Learning, and the Human Quest: Wisdom. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 131, 85–93, doi:10.1002/ace.424.
Jarvis, P. (2012a). Learning from Everyday Life. Human & Social Studies. Research and Practice, 1(1), 1–20.
Jarvis, P. (2012b). Transformatywny potencjał uczenia się w sytuacjach kryzysowych [The Transformative Potential of Learning in Situations of Crisis]. Teraźniejszość-Człowiek-Edukacja, 3(59), 127–136.
Jeste, D. V., Depp, C. A., & Vahia, I. V. (2010). Successful Cognitiveand Emotional Aging. World Psychiatry, 9, 78–84, doi: 0.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00277.x.
Juczyński, Z. (2001). Skala Satysfakcji z Życia [Satisfaction with Life Scale SWLS]. In: Z. Juczyński (Ed.), Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia [Measurement Tools in Health Promotion and Psychology], (pp. 134–138). Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Kalbarczyk-Stęclik, M., & Mackiewicz-Łyziak, J. (2019). Physical Activity and Healthcare Costs: Projections for Poland in the Context of an Ageing Population. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 17, 523–532, doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00472-9.
Kargul, J. (2005). Obszary pozaformalnej i nieformalnej edukacji dorosłych [Areas of Non-formal and Informal Adult Education]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
Katz, S. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, Aging, and the Management of Everyday Life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14(2), 135–152, doi: 10.1016/S0890-4065(00)80008-0.
Kozerska, A. (2018). Międzypokoleniowe różnice w rozumieniu pojęcia pomyślnego starzenia się [Understanding the Concept of Successful Ageing – Intergenerational Differences]. Edukacja Dorosłych, 78(1), 73–93.
Lee, S. (2018). Volunteer-Charity Activity and its Pathways to Older Adults’ Social and Emotional Well-Being. European Journal of Public Health, 28, 388-389, doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky214.231.
Martinson, M., & Berridge, C. (2015). Successful Aging and Its Discontents: A Systematic Review of the Social Gerontology Literature. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 58–69, doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu037.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Minkler, M. (1990). Aging and Disability: Behind and Beyond the Stereotypes. Journal of Aging Studies, 4(3), 245-260.
Niewiedział, D. (2008). Formalne i treściowe aspekty pojęcia aktywności ludzi starych [Formal and Essential Aspects of Old People’s Activity]. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 13(2), 96–105.
Peterson, N. M., & Martin, P. (2015). Tracing the Origins of Success: Implications for Successful Aging. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 5–13, doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu054.
Piercy, K. W., Cheek, C., & Teemant, B. (2011). Challenges and Psychosocial Growth for Older Volunteers Giving Intensive Humanitarian Service. The Gerontologist, 51, 550–560, doi:10.1093/geront/gnr013.
Read, S., Braam, A. W., Lyyra, T. M., & Deeg, D. J. (2014). Do Negative Life Events Promote Gerotranscendence in the Second Half of Life? Aging & Mental Health, 18(1), 117–124, doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.814101.
Rebelo, P.L., & Pereira, N.S. (2014). Assessing Health Endowment, Access and Choice Determinants: Impact on Retired Europeans’ (In)activity and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research, 119 (3), 1411–1446, doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0542-1.
Rote, S., Hill, T. D., & Ellison, C. G. (2012). Religious Attendance and Loneliness in Later Life. The Gerontologist, 53(1), 39–50, doi: 10.1093/geront/gns063.
Rowe, J.W., & Kahn, R.L. (1998). Successful Aging. New York: Pantheon Books.
Rubinstein, R. L., & de Medeiros, K. (2015). “Successful Aging,” Gerontological Theory and Neoliberalism: A Qualitative Critique. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 34–42, doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu080.
Rządowy Program na rzecz Aktywności Społecznej Osób Starszych na lata 2014-2020 [Government Programme for the Social Participation of Senior Citizens (ASOS) 2014-2020]. Retrieved 14 November 2018 from http://senior.gov.pl/assets/uploads/Za-%C5%82%C4%85cznik%20nr%204.pdf.
Semków, J. (2001). Wielość wymiarów przestrzeni życiowej ludzi w III wieku [Multiplicity of Dimensions of the Living Space of People in the Third Age]. In: M. Dzięgielewska (Ed.), Przestrzeń życiowa i społeczna ludzi starszych [Living and Social Space of Older People], (pp.27–32). Łodź: Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne.
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001). Getting Older, Getting Better? Personal Strivings and Psychological Maturity Across the Life Span. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 491–501, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.491.
Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974). The Structures of the Life World, Heinemann, London: Northwestern University Press.
Steuden, S., Brudek, P., & Izdebski, P. (2016). Polska adaptacja trzywymiarowej skali mądrości (3D-WS) Moniki Ardelt [A Polish Adaptation of Monika Ardelt’s Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS).]. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 19(4), 745–768, doi: 10.18290/rpsych.2016.19.4-4en.
Strawbridge, W.J., Wallhagen, M.I., & Cohen, R.D. (2002). Successful Aging and Well-being: Self-Rated Compared with Rowe i Kahn. The Gerontologist, 42, 727–733, doi: 10.1093/geront/42.6.727.
Tornstam, L. (1994). Gerotranscendence – a Theoretical and Empirical Exploration. In: L.E. Thomas, & S.A. Eisenhandler (Eds.), Aging and the Religious Dimension (pp.203–225). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Tornstam, L. (2003). Gerotranscendence from Young Old Age to Old Old Age. Retrieved 15 February 2016 from http://www. soc.uu.se/publications/fulltext/gtransoldold.pdf.
Tornstam, L. (2011). Maturing into Gerotranscendence. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 43(2), 166–180.
WHO (2002). WHO: Active Ageing: A Policy Framework World Health Organization, Geneva 2002, Retrieved 15 February 2016 from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/who_nmh_nph_02.8.pdf.
Villar, F., Serrat, R., Celdrán, M., & Pinazo, S. (2019). Active Aging and Learning Outcomes: What Can Older People Learn from Participation? Adult Education Quarterly, 1–18, doi: 10.1177/0741713619897589.
Vozikaki, M., Linardakis M., Micheli K., & Philalithis A. (2016). Activity Participation and Well-being among European Adults Aged 65 Years and Older. Social Indicators Rese arch: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 131(2), 769–795, doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1256-y.
Zaidi, A., & Zolyomi, E. (2011). Active Ageing. Research Note 7/2011. Brussels.
Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Zolyomi, E., Schmidt, A., Rodrigues, R., & Marin, B. (2017). Measuring Active and Healthy Ageing in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(2), 138–157, doi: 10.1177/0958928716676550.
Zucker, A. N., Ostrove, J. M., & Stewart, A. J. (2002). College-Educated Women’s Personality Development in Adulthood: Perceptions and Age Differences. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 236–244, doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.236.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 622
Number of citations: 0