Recognition or Guidance
Two Anthropologies of Revelation in Sethian Gnosticism and Mandaeism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TiCz.2026.009Parole chiave
revelation, Sethian Gnosticism, Mandaeism, recognition, guidance, theological anthropologyAbstract
This article compares Sethian Gnosticism and Mandaeism as two structurally distinct anthropologies of revelation. In the Sethian tradition, revelation is an act of ontological recognition: the revealer discloses to the recipient what the recipient already is: a nature that precedes the act of disclosure and makes it possible. In the Mandaean tradition, revelation takes the form of guidance: the revealer enters into a relationship that must be sustained through repeated ritual practice, and the soul's salvation depends on whether that relationship is maintained. The difference is not one of emphasis but of anthropological structure. The article argues that these two patterns – recognition and guidance – are not extinct historical options but live possibilities that any theology of revelation implicitly inhabits.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Arabestani, Mehrdad. “The Mandaeans’ Religious System: From Mythos to Logos.” Iran and the Caucasus 20, no. 3-4 (2016): 179-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573384X-20160302.
Buckley, Jorunn J. “Polemics and Exorcism in Mandaean Baptism.” History of Religions 47, no. 2/3 (2007): 156-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/524208.
Buckley, Jorunn J. The Mandaeans: Ancient Texts and Modern People. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Buckley, Jorunn J. “Why Once Is Not Enough: Mandaean Baptism (Maṣbuta) as an Example of a Repeated Ritual.” History of Religions 29, no. 1 (1989): 23-34.
Burns, Dylan M. Apocalypse of the Alien God: Platonism and the Exile of Sethian Gnosticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.
Drower, Ethel S. The Canonical Prayerbook of the Mandaeans. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1959.
Häberl, Charles G. “Mandaeism in Antiquity and the Antiquity of Mandaeism.” Religion Compass 6, no. 5 (2012): 262-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2012.00349.x.
King, Karen L. The Secret Revelation of John. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Layton, Bentley. The Gnostic Scriptures: A New Translation With Annotations and Introductions. New York: Doubleday, 1987.
MacRae, George W. “The Ego-Proclamation in Gnostic Sources.” In The Trial of Jesus, ed. Ernst Bammel, 122-134. London: Students Christian Movement Press, 1970.
Nasoraia, Brikha H. “Probing the Relationships Between Mandaeans (the Followers of John the Baptist), Early Christians, and Manichaeans.” Religions 16, no. 1 (2024): 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010014.
Poirier, Paul-Hubert. La pensée première à la triple forme: NH XIII, 1. Québec ; Louvain et al.: Presses de l’Université Laval Peeters, 2006.
Rudolph, Kurt. “The Relevance of Mandaean Literature to the Study of Near Eastern Religions.” ARAM Periodical, no. 16 (2004): 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/ARAM.16.0.504668.
Segelberg, Eric. Maṣbuta: Studies in the Ritual of Mandaean Baptism. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1958.
Turner, John D. “Introduction: NHC XIII,I*: TRIMORPHIC PROTENNOIA 35*,1-50*,24.” In Nag Hammadi Codices XI, XII, XIII, ed. Charles W. Hedrick, 371-401. Leiden ; Boston: BRILL, 1990.
Turner, John D. trans. “NHC XIII,I: Trimorphic Protennoia.” In Nag Hammadi Codices XI, XII, XIII, ed. Charles W. Hedrick, 371-454. Leiden ; Boston: BRILL, 1990.
Turner, John D. “Ritual in Gnosticism.” In Gnosticism and Later Platonism: Themes, Figures, and Texts, ed. John D. Turner and Ruth D. Majercik, 83-139. Atlanta: SBL, 2000.
Turner, John D. “Sethian Gnosticism: A Literary History.” In Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, and Early Christianity, ed. Charles W. Hedrick and Robert Hodgson, 55-86. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1986.
Williams, Michael Allen. Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Versioni
- 2026-10-07 (2)
- 2026-06-30 (1)
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Łukasz Koszałka
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 12
Number of citations: 0
