Psychology and Religion. Remarks from a Methodological Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2021.014Słowa kluczowe
scientific psychology, religion tradition, personalism, methodology psychologyAbstrakt
The paper is an overview of the connections between scientific psychology and religion. The thesis that scientific psychology, which deals with empirical research of all manifestations of spirituality and religiousness within the different principles and contexts of culture, cannot refer to the doctrine of religion, but it should take into account in its research the cultural aspects of the religion without valuing them at the individual human level (personalistic psychology) and their influence on the "fate" of the world (e. g. cultural psychology), is being discussed. Conclusion: Against the background of the twentieth-century Anglo-Saxon psychology, based on the positivist paradigm, there is no place on the basis of valid methodological canons for building a direct relationship between scientific psychology and religion.
Bibliografia
Allport, W.G. (1942). The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Atran, S., Ginges, J. (2015). Devoted Actors and the Moral Foundations of Intractable Intergroup Conflict, [in:] J. Decety, T. Wheatley (Eds.), The Moral Brain. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. London: Cambridge, MA.
Blosser, Ph. (1995). Scheler’s Critique of Kant’s Ethics, Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.
Boesch, E.E. (1991). Symbolic Action Theoory and Cultural Psychology. Berlin-Heidelberg: Spronger-Verlag.
Butterfield, J., 1998, “Determinism and Indeterminism,” in: E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London: Routledge.
Busenitz, L.W., Barney, J.B. (1997). Differences between Enterpreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in Strategic Decision. Journal of Busines Venturing, 12, 9-30.
Chapman, L.J., Chapman, J.P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an abstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74(3), 271-280.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Preambuła: 12.XII.2004.
Chauchard, P. (1959). Biologie et morale. Paris: Mame.
Cohen, A. B., & Hill, P. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75, 709–742.
Colosimo, J-F. (2015). Les Hommes en trop. La malédiction des chrétiens d'Orient. Paris: Fayard.
Damasio, A. (1999). Descartes’ Error Reason, and the Human Brain (Polish edition by REBIS Publishing House Ltd., Poznań).
Eccles, J., Gibson, W. (1979). Sherrington: His Life and Thought. New York: Springer International. 1–6, 15, 24–25
Emmons, R.A. (2005). Emotion and Religion, [in:] R.F. Paloutzian, C.L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, New York: The Guilford Press.
Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
Foot, Ph. (1995). Does Moral Subjectivism Rest on a Mistake?, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15: 1-14.
Frankl, V. (1997). Recollections: An Autobiography (Transllated by Joseph and Judith Fabry). New York: Perseus Books Group.
Fromm, E, (1950). Psychoanalysis and religion. New Haven Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Galanter, M. (2006). Spirituality and the Helthy mind: Science, Therapy, and the Reed for Personal meaning. Oxford: University Press.
Greenberg, J., Koole, S.L., Pyszczynski, T.A. (2004). Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Heller, M. (2008). A Comprehensible Universe: The Interplay of Science and Theology. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Jan Paweł II (1998). Fides et Ratio. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness: Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454.
Krąpiec, M.A. (1993). Person and natural law. Catholic Thought from Lublin, vol. 7. Berlin-NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Krokos, J., Mazanka, P. (Eds.) (2008). Some Questions of Classical Philosophy, Warsaw: Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University Publishig.
Küng, H., (1990). Projekt Weltethos, München: Piper Verlag
Lamiel, J.T. (2010). Why was there no place for personalistic thinking in 20th century psychology? New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 135-142.
Lines, D. (2006). Spirituality in counselling and psychotherapy, London: SAGE Publications.
Lorenz, K. (1966). On Aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Translated by Marjorie Kerr Wilson. Originally published in Austria under the title „Das sogenannte Böse. Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression”. Viena: Dr. G. Borotha-Schoeler Verlag, 1963).
Marshall, J. M. (1989). Heidegger as depicted by Binswanger and Boss. Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 9(2), 37-43.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 50 (4): 370-396
Medea, E (1966). Father Agostino Gemelli (1878–1959). Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia et Psichiatria. 27 (2), 98–105.
Nicholson, I. (1997). Humanistic psychology and intellectual identity: The 'open' system of Gordon Allport. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 37, 60-78.
Palmieri, PA., Marshall, G.N., Schell, T.R. (2007). Confirmatory factor analysis of posttraumatic stress symptoms in Cambodian refugees. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20 (2), 207-216.
Paloutzian, R.F., Park, C.L. (2015). Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Second Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
Persinger, M.A. (1987). Neuropsychological Bases of God Beliefs, New York: Praeger Publishers.
Popielski, K. (2017). Health and Illness as a Multidimensional Category. In: N.M. Rimashevskaya and K. Popielski (Eds): Comparative study of young people’s health
in Russia, Belarus and Poland. Lublin: Institute of Biofeedback and Nooosychomatic, pp. 22-36.
Prinz, J. (2009). The Normativity Challenge: Cultural Psychology Provides the Real Threat to Virtue Ethics, Journal of Ethics, 13: 117-44.
Rahner, K. (1970). Bible – B. Theology. W: K. Rahner, C. Ernst, K. Smyth (Eds.). Edition 5. Sacramentum Mundi. An Encyclopedia of Theology. T. 1, Londyn: Burns & Oats.
Roger, C. Carl (1978). Rogers on Personal Power Inner Strength and Its Revolutionary Impact (Psychology/self-help). Queen Village, Philadelphia, PA: Trans-Atlantic Publications Inc.
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. 80 (1), 1-28. American Psychological Association.
Safir, M.P., Wallach, H.S., "Skip" Rizzo, A. (2014). Future Directions in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Prevention, Diagnosis. Berlin: Springer.
Samuels, P.A., Lester, D. (1985). A preliminary invastigation of emotions experienced toward God by catholic nuns and priests, Psychological Reports, 56, 706-710.
Sartre, J. P. (1973). Existentialism and Humanism. (Transl. By Philip Mairet), London: Eyre Methuen.
Schjoedt, U., Stodkilde-Jorgensen, H. et al. (2009). Highly Religious Participants Recruit Areas of Social Cognition in Personal Prayer, Social Cognitive and Aff ective Neuroscience, 4, 199-207.
Schwartz, S. H. (2011b). Values: Individual and cultural. W: F. J. R. van de Vijver, A. Chasiotis, S. M. Breugelmans (red.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (s. 463–493). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, S. H., Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878–891.
Schwartz, S. H., Roccas, S. (1997). Church-state relations and the association of religiosity with values: A study of Catholics in six countries. Cross-Cultural Research. The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 31(4), 356–375.
Speaight, R. (1967). The Life of Teilhard de Chardin. New York: Harper and Row.
Stadler, F. (1998). “The Vienna Circle”, in: E. Craig (Ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Volume 9), London: Routledge.
Stokes, G. (1998). Popper: Philosophy, Politics and Scientific Method. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Sutcliffe, S. J.; Gilhus, I. S. (2013). "Introduction: "All mixed up" – Thinking about Religion in Relation to New Age Spiritualities". In: S. J. Sutcliffe and I. S. Gilhus (eds.). New Age Spirituality: Rethinking Religion. Durham, UK: Acumen. pp. 1–16.
Tennant, C. (2007). Prisoners of war. In: G. Fink (Ed.): Encyclopedia of stress. Second Edition (Vol. 3, pp. 223-226). New York: Academic Press.
Thaler, R.H. (1999). Mental Accouting Matters, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183-206.
Thornton, S. (2016). Karl Popper (ang.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge , pp. 09-21.
Total Fitness for the 21st Century Conference. Report Institute for Alternative Futures, San Diego (USA), December 6-9, 2009.
Truszczyński, O. Terelak, J.F., Turek, M. (2000), Personality of Polish Soldiers and their way stress-coping during Bosnia Peacekeeping Mission, In: Proceedings of the 36th International Applied Military Psychology Symposium (IAMPS) at Split (Croatia), 11-15 September 2000, Changing mission for the 21st century, Zagreb 2000, pp.251-256.
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Valent, P (2007). Holocaust, stress effects of. In: G. Fink (Ed.): Encyclopedia of stress. Second Edition (Vol. 2, pp. 342-346). New York: Academic Press.
Van Kaam, A. L. (1969). Existential foundations of psychology. Garden City–New York: Image Books.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2021 Scientia et Fides

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 920
Liczba cytowań: 3