Ir al contenido principal Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
  • Registrarse
  • Entrar
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Inicio
  • Actual
  • Archivos
  • Avisos
  • Acerca de
    • Sobre la revista
    • Envíos
    • Equipo editorial
    • Scientific Council
    • Reviewers
    • Review process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Declaración de privacidad
    • Archiving policy
    • Contacto
  • Registrarse
  • Entrar
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Scientia et Fides

Psychology and Religion. Remarks from a Methodological Perspective
  • Inicio
  • /
  • Psychology and Religion. Remarks from a Methodological Perspective
  1. Inicio /
  2. Archivos /
  3. Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2021) /
  4. Articles

Psychology and Religion. Remarks from a Methodological Perspective

Autores/as

  • Jan Felicjan Terelak Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-9409

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2021.014

Palabras clave

scientific psychology, religion tradition, personalism, methodology psychology

Resumen

The paper is an overview of the connections between scientific psychology and religion. The thesis that scientific psychology, which deals with empirical research of all manifestations of spirituality and religiousness within the different principles and contexts of culture, cannot refer to the doctrine of religion, but it should take into account in its research the cultural aspects of the religion without valuing them at the individual human level (personalistic psychology) and their influence on the "fate" of the world (e. g. cultural psychology), is being discussed. Conclusion: Against the background of the twentieth-century Anglo-Saxon psychology, based on the positivist paradigm, there is no place on the basis of valid methodological canons for building a direct relationship between scientific psychology and religion.

Citas

Allport, W.G. (1942). The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science. New York: Social Science Research Council.

Atran, S., Ginges, J. (2015). Devoted Actors and the Moral Foundations of Intractable Intergroup Conflict, [in:] J. Decety, T. Wheatley (Eds.), The Moral Brain. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. London: Cambridge, MA.

Blosser, Ph. (1995). Scheler’s Critique of Kant’s Ethics, Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

Boesch, E.E. (1991). Symbolic Action Theoory and Cultural Psychology. Berlin-Heidelberg: Spronger-Verlag.

Butterfield, J., 1998, “Determinism and Indeterminism,” in: E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London: Routledge.

Busenitz, L.W., Barney, J.B. (1997). Differences between Enterpreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in Strategic Decision. Journal of Busines Venturing, 12, 9-30.

Chapman, L.J., Chapman, J.P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an abstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74(3), 271-280.

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Preambuła: 12.XII.2004.

Chauchard, P. (1959). Biologie et morale. Paris: Mame.

Cohen, A. B., & Hill, P. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75, 709–742.

Colosimo, J-F. (2015). Les Hommes en trop. La malédiction des chrétiens d'Orient. Paris: Fayard.

Damasio, A. (1999). Descartes’ Error Reason, and the Human Brain (Polish edition by REBIS Publishing House Ltd., Poznań).

Eccles, J., Gibson, W. (1979). Sherrington: His Life and Thought. New York: Springer International. 1–6, 15, 24–25

Emmons, R.A. (2005). Emotion and Religion, [in:] R.F. Paloutzian, C.L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, New York: The Guilford Press.

Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.

Foot, Ph. (1995). Does Moral Subjectivism Rest on a Mistake?, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15: 1-14.

Frankl, V. (1997). Recollections: An Autobiography (Transllated by Joseph and Judith Fabry). New York: Perseus Books Group.

Fromm, E, (1950). Psychoanalysis and religion. New Haven Connecticut: Yale University Press.

Galanter, M. (2006). Spirituality and the Helthy mind: Science, Therapy, and the Reed for Personal meaning. Oxford: University Press.

Greenberg, J., Koole, S.L., Pyszczynski, T.A. (2004). Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

Heller, M. (2008). A Comprehensible Universe: The Interplay of Science and Theology. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Jan Paweł II (1998). Fides et Ratio. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness: Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454.

Krąpiec, M.A. (1993). Person and natural law. Catholic Thought from Lublin, vol. 7. Berlin-NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

Krokos, J., Mazanka, P. (Eds.) (2008). Some Questions of Classical Philosophy, Warsaw: Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University Publishig.

Küng, H., (1990). Projekt Weltethos, München: Piper Verlag

Lamiel, J.T. (2010). Why was there no place for personalistic thinking in 20th century psychology? New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 135-142.

Lines, D. (2006). Spirituality in counselling and psychotherapy, London: SAGE Publications.

Lorenz, K. (1966). On Aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Translated by Marjorie Kerr Wilson. Originally published in Austria under the title „Das sogenannte Böse. Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression”. Viena: Dr. G. Borotha-Schoeler Verlag, 1963).

Marshall, J. M. (1989). Heidegger as depicted by Binswanger and Boss. Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 9(2), 37-43.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 50 (4): 370-396

Medea, E (1966). Father Agostino Gemelli (1878–1959). Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia et Psichiatria. 27 (2), 98–105.

Nicholson, I. (1997). Humanistic psychology and intellectual identity: The 'open' system of Gordon Allport. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 37, 60-78.

Palmieri, PA., Marshall, G.N., Schell, T.R. (2007). Confirmatory factor analysis of posttraumatic stress symptoms in Cambodian refugees. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20 (2), 207-216.

Paloutzian, R.F., Park, C.L. (2015). Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Second Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

Persinger, M.A. (1987). Neuropsychological Bases of God Beliefs, New York: Praeger Publishers.

Popielski, K. (2017). Health and Illness as a Multidimensional Category. In: N.M. Rimashevskaya and K. Popielski (Eds): Comparative study of young people’s health

in Russia, Belarus and Poland. Lublin: Institute of Biofeedback and Nooosychomatic, pp. 22-36.

Prinz, J. (2009). The Normativity Challenge: Cultural Psychology Provides the Real Threat to Virtue Ethics, Journal of Ethics, 13: 117-44.

Rahner, K. (1970). Bible – B. Theology. W: K. Rahner, C. Ernst, K. Smyth (Eds.). Edition 5. Sacramentum Mundi. An Encyclopedia of Theology. T. 1, Londyn: Burns & Oats.

Roger, C. Carl (1978). Rogers on Personal Power Inner Strength and Its Revolutionary Impact (Psychology/self-help). Queen Village, Philadelphia, PA: Trans-Atlantic Publications Inc.

Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. 80 (1), 1-28. American Psychological Association.

Safir, M.P., Wallach, H.S., "Skip" Rizzo, A. (2014). Future Directions in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Prevention, Diagnosis. Berlin: Springer.

Samuels, P.A., Lester, D. (1985). A preliminary invastigation of emotions experienced toward God by catholic nuns and priests, Psychological Reports, 56, 706-710.

Sartre, J. P. (1973). Existentialism and Humanism. (Transl. By Philip Mairet), London: Eyre Methuen.

Schjoedt, U., Stodkilde-Jorgensen, H. et al. (2009). Highly Religious Participants Recruit Areas of Social Cognition in Personal Prayer, Social Cognitive and Aff ective Neuroscience, 4, 199-207.

Schwartz, S. H. (2011b). Values: Individual and cultural. W: F. J. R. van de Vijver, A. Chasiotis, S. M. Breugelmans (red.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (s. 463–493). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schwartz, S. H., Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878–891.

Schwartz, S. H., Roccas, S. (1997). Church-state relations and the association of religiosity with values: A study of Catholics in six countries. Cross-Cultural Research. The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 31(4), 356–375.

Speaight, R. (1967). The Life of Teilhard de Chardin. New York: Harper and Row.

Stadler, F. (1998). “The Vienna Circle”, in: E. Craig (Ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Volume 9), London: Routledge.

Stokes, G. (1998). Popper: Philosophy, Politics and Scientific Method. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Sutcliffe, S. J.; Gilhus, I. S. (2013). "Introduction: "All mixed up" – Thinking about Religion in Relation to New Age Spiritualities". In: S. J. Sutcliffe and I. S. Gilhus (eds.). New Age Spirituality: Rethinking Religion. Durham, UK: Acumen. pp. 1–16.

Tennant, C. (2007). Prisoners of war. In: G. Fink (Ed.): Encyclopedia of stress. Second Edition (Vol. 3, pp. 223-226). New York: Academic Press.

Thaler, R.H. (1999). Mental Accouting Matters, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183-206.

Thornton, S. (2016). Karl Popper (ang.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge , pp. 09-21.

Total Fitness for the 21st Century Conference. Report Institute for Alternative Futures, San Diego (USA), December 6-9, 2009.

Truszczyński, O. Terelak, J.F., Turek, M. (2000), Personality of Polish Soldiers and their way stress-coping during Bosnia Peacekeeping Mission, In: Proceedings of the 36th International Applied Military Psychology Symposium (IAMPS) at Split (Croatia), 11-15 September 2000, Changing mission for the 21st century, Zagreb 2000, pp.251-256.

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

Valent, P (2007). Holocaust, stress effects of. In: G. Fink (Ed.): Encyclopedia of stress. Second Edition (Vol. 2, pp. 342-346). New York: Academic Press.

Van Kaam, A. L. (1969). Existential foundations of psychology. Garden City–New York: Image Books.

Scientia et Fides

Descargas

  • PDF (English)

Publicado

2021-03-14

Cómo citar

1.
TERELAK, Jan Felicjan. Psychology and Religion. Remarks from a Methodological Perspective. Scientia et Fides. Online. 14 marzo 2021. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 357-382. [Accessed 4 julio 2025]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2021.014.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Descargar cita
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Número

Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2021)

Sección

Articles

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2021 Scientia et Fides

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 920
Number of citations: 3

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 2300-7648

eISSN: 2353-5636

Search

Search

Browse

  • Examinar índice de autores/as
  • Issue archive

User

User

Número actual

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Información

  • Para lectores/as
  • Para autores/as
  • Para bibliotecarios/as

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Idioma

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

scientific psychology, religion tradition, personalism, methodology psychology
Arriba

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop