Aller directement au contenu principal Aller directement au menu principal Aller au pied de page
  • S'inscrire
  • Se connecter
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Accueil
  • Numéro courant
  • Archives
  • Annonces
  • À propos
    • À propos de cette revue
    • Soumissions
    • Comité éditorial
    • Scientific Council
    • Reviewers
    • Review process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Déclaration de confidentialité
    • Archiving policy
    • Contact
  • S'inscrire
  • Se connecter
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Scientia et Fides

Is Pain Metaphysically Evil (Malum Simpliciter)? : Some Thoughts from a Thomistic Perspective
  • Accueil
  • /
  • Is Pain Metaphysically Evil (Malum Simpliciter)? : Some Thoughts from a Thomistic Perspective
  1. Accueil /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 12 No 1 (2024): The Dynamic Theodicy Model: Understanding God, Evil, and Evolution /
  4. Articles

Is Pain Metaphysically Evil (Malum Simpliciter)?

Some Thoughts from a Thomistic Perspective

Auteurs

  • Mariusz Tabaczek Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Rome https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-8337

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2024.008

Mots-clés

appetite, Aquinas, emotion, evil, pain, passion, suffering, theodicy

Résumé

Contrary to the commonly assumed opinion that Christianity sees pain as intrinsically evil – where evil is defined as the lack of something good – Aquinas defines pain not as a privation but rather a passion of the soul, i.e., an emotion that depends on sensual and/or intellective cognition of something evil, is good in itself, and may serve a purpose. This article offers a formalized version of the Thomistic definition of pain and related negative (unpleasant) emotions experienced by humans. It also compares and contrasts this view with some contemporary scientific and philosophical models of pain.

Références

Works of Aquinas

De malo. Quaestiones disputatae de malo. Vol. 23 of Opera Omnia. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1982. [English translation: On Evil. Translated by John A. Oesterle and Jean T. Oesterle. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.]

SCG Summa contra gentiles. 3 vols. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1961–1967. [English translation: On the Truth of the Catholic Faith: Summa Contra Gentiles. 4 vols. Translated by Anton C. Pegis et al. Garden City, New York: Image Books, 1955–1957.]

ST Summa theologiae. Rome: Editiones Paulinae, 1962. [English translation: Summa Theologica. 3 vols. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Bros., 1946.]

Other References

Aydede, Murat. 2019. “Pain.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/pain/.

Bosch, Magdalena. 2020. Desire and Human Flourishing: Perspectives from Positive Psychology, Moral Education and Virtue Ethics. Cham: Springer Nature.

Chignell, Andrew. 2021. “Kinds and Origins of Evil.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/evil-kindsorigins/.

Craig, Arthur Devitt. 2003. “A New View of Pain as a Homeostatic Emotion.” Trends in Neurosciences 26, no. 6: 303–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00123-1.

Fiske, John. 1874. Outlines of Cosmic Philosophy: Based on the Doctrine of Evolution, with Criticisms on the Positive Philosophy. Vol. 2. London: MacMillan.

Kane, G. Stanley. 1980. “Evil and Privation.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11, no. 1: 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138764.

Keltz, B. Kyle. 2019a. “A Thomistic Answer to the Evil-God Challenge.” The Heythrop Journal 60, no. 5: 689–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.13181.

Keltz, B. Kyle. 2019b. “God’s Purpose for the Universe and the Problem of Animal Suffering.” Sophia 58, no. 3: 475–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0611-z.

Keltz, B. Kyle. 2019c. “Neo-Thomism and the Problem of Animal Suffering.” Nova et Vetera 17, no. 1: 93–125. https://doi-org.proxy.library.nd.edu/10.1353/nov.2019.0004.

Keltz, B. Kyle. 2020a. “Is Animal Suffering Evil? A Thomistic Perspective.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 54, no. 1: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09680-x.

Keltz, B. Kyle. 2020b. Thomism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

Keltz, B. Kyle. 2022a. Bringing Good Even Out of Evil: Thomism and the Problem of Evil. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Keltz, B. Kyle. 2022b. “Could A Good God Allow Death Before the Fall? A Thomistic Perspective.” The Heythrop Journal 63, no. 4: 703–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12658.

Klein, Colin. 2015. What the Body Commands: The Imperative Theory of Pain. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Loeser, John D. 1980. “Perspectives on Pain.” In Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, edited by Paul Turner, C. Padgham, and Alan Hedges, 313–16. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lombardo, Nicholas Emerson. 2011. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion. Washington, D.C.: CUA Press.

Manzanedo, Marcos F. 2004. Las pasiones según Santo Tomás. Salamanca: Editorial San Esteban.

Marchand, Serge. 2012. The Phenomenon of Pain. Seattle: IASP Press.

Marchand, Serge. 2021. “Mechanisms Challenges of the Pain Phenomenon.” Frontiers in Pain Research 1. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2020.574370.

Robson, Mark Ian Thomas. 2013. “Evil, Privation, Depression and Dread.” New Blackfriars 94, no. 1053: 552–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2012.01516.x.

Rodriguez, Victorino. 1957. “Presupuestos psicológicos para una moral del dolor,” La Ciencia Tomista, LXIII: 613–639.

Rowe, William L. 1979. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16, no. 4: 335–41.

Swenson, Adam. 2009. “Pain’s Evils.” Utilitas 21, no. 2: 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820809003471.

Scientia et Fides

Téléchargements

  • PDF (English)

Publiée

2024-04-09

Comment citer

1.
TABACZEK, Mariusz. Is Pain Metaphysically Evil (Malum Simpliciter)? : Some Thoughts from a Thomistic Perspective. Scientia et Fides. Online. 9 avril 2024. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 143-162. [Accessed 4 juillet 2025]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2024.008.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Télécharger la référence bibliographique
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numéro

Vol. 12 No 1 (2024): The Dynamic Theodicy Model: Understanding God, Evil, and Evolution

Rubrique

Articles

Licence

© Mariusz Tabaczek 2024

Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 531
Number of citations: 0

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 2300-7648

eISSN: 2353-5636

Search

Search

Browse

  • Explorer l'Index des auteurs
  • Issue archive

User

User

Numéro courant

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informations

  • Pour les lecteurs
  • Pour les auteurs
  • Pour les bibliothécaires

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Langue

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

appetite, Aquinas, emotion, evil, pain, passion, suffering, theodicy
Haut

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop