Neuronauki a zagadnienie wiedzy Jezusa
Palabras clave
Dogmatic Christology, theological anthropology, humanity of ChristResumen
Neurosciences and the Question of the Knowledge of Jesus
Rapidly developing neurosciences provide greater and greater insight into human cognitive processes. In this context one may formulate a hypothesis that the current reception of their research findings by theological anthropology can serve as a turning point in the discussion over the question of the human knowledge of Jesus, which is held within dogmatic christology. Classical christology is open to adopt the data from neurosciences, particularly thanks to the conviction, upheld by the Chalcedonian dogma, that the characteristics of natures in Christ do not undergo any changes after the Incarnation. It is especially in the reflection upon the characteristics of human nature that the results of natural sciences should be taken into account as they can indicate some intransgressible limits of human cognitive abilities. One of the results of this reception is a more and more clearly noticeable need for the revision of a common belief in theological anthropology stating that all the “higher” acts of human cognition take place in the soul; thus they have a nonmaterial character. This has, in turn, its key significance for the discussion over the knowledge of Jesus, since the neo-Scholastic theory of human triple knowledge in Christ (the knowledge coming from the beatific vision, the infused knowledge, the acquired knowledge), drawing its inspiration from the hypotheses of St. Thomas Aquinas, was to a great extent based on the assumption that the soul is the center of cognition, which can be gained in a way independent of the body. Given the new perspective of understanding human cognition, open to us by neurosciences, the attempts to sustain this theory may result in material heresy consisting in attributing Christ some characteristics which can by no means be regarded as belonging to human nature (in the pre-Paschal state).
Citas
Baron and Pietras 2002. Dokumenty Soborów Powszechnych, edited by Arkadiusz Baron, Henryk Pietras, vol. 1. Kraków: WAM.
Bloom, Floyd E. 2008. “Fundamentals of Neuroscience”. In Fundamental Neuroscience, edited by Larry Squire et al., 3–13, London: Elsevier.
Bremer, Józef. 2010. „Status ontyczny osoby z perspektywy neuronauk.” Analiza i Egzystencja 11: 264–290.
Buxakowski, Jerzy. 2000. Jezus Chrystus – osoba i czyn. Pelplin: Bernardinum.
Cortez, Marc. 2010. Theological Anthropology. A guide for the Perplexed. London, New York: T & T Clarc.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. “Transhumanism.” Foreign Policy, October 42–43.
Galot, Jean. 1971. La conscience de Jésus. Gembloux: Duculot.
Górska 2011. Mózg a zachowanie, edited by Teresa Górska, Anna Grabowska, Jolanta Zagrodzka. Warszawa: PWN.
Grillmeier, Alois. 1982. Gesù il Cristo nella fede della chiesa, vol. 1/1, Brescia: Paideia.
Guttwenger, Engelbert. 1960. Bewusstsein und Wissen Christi. Eine dogmatische Studie. Innsbruck: Verlag Felizian Rauch.
Iammarrone, Luigi. 1983. “La visione beatifica di Cristo viatore nel pensiero di San Tommaso.” Doctor communis 36, 2–3: 287–330.
Inchaurraga, P. 1954. „La unidad psicologica de Cristo en la controversia Galtier-Parente.“ Lumen 3: 215–239
Kongregacja Nauki Wiary 1984, Instrukcja o niektórych aspektach teologii wyzwolenia Libertatis nuntius.
Mouroux, Jean. 1962. Le mystère du temps. Approche théologique. Paris: Aubier.
Newberg, Andrew. 2010. Principles of Neurotheology. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
Ochorowicz, Julian. 1974. Bedingungen des Bewußtwerdens. Eine physiologisch-psychologische Studie. Leipzig: Verlag von Heinrich Matthias.
Parente, Pietro. 1951. L’Io di Cristo. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Rahner, Karl. 1962. „Dogmatische Erwägungen über das Wissen und Selbstbewußtsein Christi.“ In: idem, Schriften zur Theologie, vol. 5, Einsiedeln: Benziger Verlag, 222–245.
Salvadori, Ivan. 2011. L’autocoscienza di Gesù “in tutto simile a noi eccetto il peccato”, Roma: Città Nuova.
Sieniatycki, Maciej. 1934. Zarys dogmatyki katolickiej, vol. 2: O Bogu stworzycielu i odkupicielu. Kraków: nakładem autora.
Torrel, Jean-Pierre. 2001. "Le savoir acquis du Christ selon les théologiens médiévaux." Revue Thomiste 101, 3: 355–408
Waters, Brent. 2014. “Flesh Made Data: The Posthuman Project in Light of the Incarnation.” In: Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement, edited by Calvin Mercer, Tracy J. Trothen. Praeger. Kindle edition.
Woźniak, Robert. 2014. „Materialno-biologiczny wymiar obrazu Bożego w człowieku.”. Scientia et Fides 2 (2): 271–288.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 866
Number of citations: 0