Metaverse, Religions and Metahumans: A Window to a Hypercontrolled Post-pandemic World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.010Słowa kluczowe
Metaverse, social control, metahumans, transhumanismAbstrakt
The creation of a Metaverses as an alternative to everyday reality heralds the first practical expression of transhumanism. The Metaverse is not, as is generally understood, an alternative reality similar to the virtual world of “Second Life”, but rather a pretended “extension” of our daily life. The Metaverse heralds the ubiquitous presentation of an augmented reality that will be essential for work and private life. In this paper we will analyse the possibilities this new technology offers for both the improvement of our well-being and also greater social control and the manipulation of our feelings and desires with particular focus on the possible impact on individual identity, privacy and political consciousness.
Bibliografia
Aparecido, Luciano, and Diogenes Cortijo and Henrique Cândido. 2022. “Evaluation of low-cost GNSS receivers for speed monitoring.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 10 (1): 239–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.12.005.
Bailenson, Jeremy. 2018. Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works and what it can do. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Bellamy, François Xavier. 2018. Demeure. Paris, Grasset & Fasquelle.
Bolger, Ryan. 2021. “Finding Wholes in the Metaverse: Posthuman Mystic as Agents of Evolutionary Contextualization.” Religions 768 (12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090768.
Coyne, Richard. 1994. “Heidegger and Virtual Reality: The Implications of Heidegger’s Thinking for Computer Representations.” Leonardo 27 (1): 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1575952.
Di Pietro, Roberto and Stefano Cresci. 2022. “Metaverse: Security and Privacy Issues.” The Third IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems, and Applications. December 13–15: 8 pages.
Dionisio, John David, and William Burns III and Richard Gilbert. 2013. “3D Virtual Words and the Metaverse: Current Status and Future Possibilities.” ACM Computing Surveys 45, nº 3, Article 34: 38 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2480741.2480751.
Egliston, Ben, and Marcus Carter. 2021a. “Critical questions for Facebook’s virtual reality: data, power and the metaverse.” Internet Policy Review 10 (4): 23 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1610.
Egliston, Ben, and Marcus Carter. 2021b. “Examining visions of surveillance in Oculus’ data and privacy policies, 2014–2020.” Media International Australia 1329878X2110416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211041670.
Falchuk, Ben, and Shoshana Loeb and Ralph Heff. 2018. “The Social Metaverse. Battle for Privacy.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 37 (2): 52–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2826060.
Frey, Davide and Jérôme Royan and Romain Piegay and others. 2008. “Solipsis: A Decentralized Architecture for Virtual Environments.” 1st International Workshop on Massively Multiuser Virtual Environments. Reno, NV.
Gaggioli, Andrea. 2017. “Phygital Spaces: When Atoms Meet Bits”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 20 (12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.29093.csi
Gilbert, Richard. 2011. “The P.R.O.S.E. Proyect: A Program of in-world behavioral research on the Metaverse.” Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 4 (1): 3–18.
Hemmati, Morteza. 2022. “The Metaverse: An Urban Revolution. Effect of the Metaverse on the Perceptions of Urban Audience.” Tourism of Culture 2 (7): 53–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/TOC.2022.323276.1067.
Hillis, Ken. 1999. Digital sensations: Space, identity, and embodiment in virtual reality. Chicago: University of Minnesota Press.
Huynh-The, Thien and Pham Quoc-Viet and Pham Xuan-Qui and others. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence for the Metaverse: A Survey.” arXiv, 2202.10336: 24 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.10336.
Jun, Guichun. 2020. “Virtual Reality Church as a New Mission Frontier in the Metaverse: Exploring Theological Controversies and Missional Potential of Virtual Reality Church.” Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 37 (4): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378820963155.
Kim, Jeong-Gwon. 2021. “A Study on Metaverse Culture Contents Matching Platforms.” International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology 9: 232–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2021.9.3.232.
Lee, Lik-Hang, and Tristan Braud and Pengyuan Zhou and others. 2021. “All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda.” Journal of Latex Class Files 8 (14): 66 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05352.
MacCallum, Kathryn, and David Parsons. 2019. “Teacher Perspectives on Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential of Metaverse for Learning.” Proceedings of World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, September 16: 21–28.
Nannan, Xi, and Juan Chen and Filipe Gama and others. 2022. “The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload” Information Systems Frontiers: 22 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10244-x.
Narin, Nida. 2021. “A Content Analysis of the Metaverse Articles.” Journal of Metaverse. 1 (1): 17–24.
Pesce, Mark. 2020. Augmented reality: Unboxing tech’s next big thing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rospigliosi, Asher. 2022. “Metaverse or Simulacra? Roblox, Minecraft, Meta and the turn to virtual reality for education, socialisation and work.” Interactive Learning Environments 30 (1): 3 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2022899
Ruppert, Evelyn, and Engin Isin and Didier Bigo. 2017. “Data politics.” Big Data & Society 4 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749.
Ryskeldiev, Bektur and Yoichi Ochiai and Michael Cohen and others. 2018. “Distributed Metaverse: Creating Decentralized Blockchain-based Model for Peer-to-peer Sharing of Virtual Spaces for Mixed Reality Applications.” ACM Press the 9th Augmented Human International Conference: 3 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3174910.3174952.
Turkle, Sherry. 1997. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Shuster.
Van der Merwe, David. 2021. “The Metaverse as Virtual Heterotopia.” 3rd World Conference on Research in Social Sciences. Vienna, 22–24 October.
Wickens, Christopher. 1992. “Virtual reality and education.” Proceedings of 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: 842–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1992.271688.
Zhao, Ruoyu, and Zhang Yushu and Lan Rushi and others. 2021. “Metaverse: Security and Privacy Concerns.” Journal of Latex Class Files 14 (8): 7 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.03854.
Zhihan. Lv, and Qiao Liang and Wang Qinjun and others. 2021. “Advanced machine-learning methods for brain-computer interfacing.” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 18, 5: 1688–1698.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Marcelo López Cambronero
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 1013
Liczba cytowań: 0
