Zum Inhalt springen Zur Hauptnavigation springen Zur Fußzeile springen
  • Registrieren
  • Einloggen
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Aktuelle Ausgabe
  • Archiv
  • Mitteilungen
  • Über uns
    • Über die Zeitschrift
    • Beitragseinreichung
    • Redaktion
    • Scientific Council
    • Reviewers
    • Review process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Schutz personenbezogener Daten
    • Archiving policy
    • Kontakt
  • Registrieren
  • Einloggen
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Scientia et Fides

Metaverse, Religions and Metahumans: A Window to a Hypercontrolled Post-pandemic World
  • Home
  • /
  • Metaverse, Religions and Metahumans: A Window to a Hypercontrolled Post-pandemic World
  1. Home /
  2. Archiv /
  3. Bd. 11 Nr. 1 (2023) /
  4. Dossier - Social Control, Postmodernism and Political Community

Metaverse, Religions and Metahumans: A Window to a Hypercontrolled Post-pandemic World

Autor/innen

  • Marcelo López Cambronero Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-1731

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.010

Schlagworte

Metaverse, social control, metahumans, transhumanism

Abstract

The creation of a Metaverses as an alternative to everyday reality heralds the first practical expression of transhumanism. The Metaverse is not, as is generally understood, an alternative reality similar to the virtual world of “Second Life”, but rather a pretended “extension” of our daily life. The Metaverse heralds the ubiquitous presentation of an augmented reality that will be essential for work and private life. In this paper we will analyse the possibilities this new technology offers for both the improvement of our well-being and also greater social control and the manipulation of our feelings and desires with particular focus on the possible impact on individual identity, privacy and political consciousness.

Literaturhinweise

Aparecido, Luciano, and Diogenes Cortijo and Henrique Cândido. 2022. “Evaluation of low-cost GNSS receivers for speed monitoring.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 10 (1): 239–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.12.005.

Bailenson, Jeremy. 2018. Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works and what it can do. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Bellamy, François Xavier. 2018. Demeure. Paris, Grasset & Fasquelle.

Bolger, Ryan. 2021. “Finding Wholes in the Metaverse: Posthuman Mystic as Agents of Evolutionary Contextualization.” Religions 768 (12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090768.

Coyne, Richard. 1994. “Heidegger and Virtual Reality: The Implications of Heidegger’s Thinking for Computer Representations.” Leonardo 27 (1): 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1575952.

Di Pietro, Roberto and Stefano Cresci. 2022. “Metaverse: Security and Privacy Issues.” The Third IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems, and Applications. December 13–15: 8 pages.

Dionisio, John David, and William Burns III and Richard Gilbert. 2013. “3D Virtual Words and the Metaverse: Current Status and Future Possibilities.” ACM Computing Surveys 45, nº 3, Article 34: 38 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2480741.2480751.

Egliston, Ben, and Marcus Carter. 2021a. “Critical questions for Facebook’s virtual reality: data, power and the metaverse.” Internet Policy Review 10 (4): 23 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1610.

Egliston, Ben, and Marcus Carter. 2021b. “Examining visions of surveillance in Oculus’ data and privacy policies, 2014–2020.” Media International Australia 1329878X2110416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211041670.

Falchuk, Ben, and Shoshana Loeb and Ralph Heff. 2018. “The Social Metaverse. Battle for Privacy.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 37 (2): 52–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2826060.

Frey, Davide and Jérôme Royan and Romain Piegay and others. 2008. “Solipsis: A Decentralized Architecture for Virtual Environments.” 1st International Workshop on Massively Multiuser Virtual Environments. Reno, NV.

Gaggioli, Andrea. 2017. “Phygital Spaces: When Atoms Meet Bits”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 20 (12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.29093.csi

Gilbert, Richard. 2011. “The P.R.O.S.E. Proyect: A Program of in-world behavioral research on the Metaverse.” Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 4 (1): 3–18.

Hemmati, Morteza. 2022. “The Metaverse: An Urban Revolution. Effect of the Metaverse on the Perceptions of Urban Audience.” Tourism of Culture 2 (7): 53–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/TOC.2022.323276.1067.

Hillis, Ken. 1999. Digital sensations: Space, identity, and embodiment in virtual reality. Chicago: University of Minnesota Press.

Huynh-The, Thien and Pham Quoc-Viet and Pham Xuan-Qui and others. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence for the Metaverse: A Survey.” arXiv, 2202.10336: 24 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.10336.

Jun, Guichun. 2020. “Virtual Reality Church as a New Mission Frontier in the Metaverse: Exploring Theological Controversies and Missional Potential of Virtual Reality Church.” Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 37 (4): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378820963155.

Kim, Jeong-Gwon. 2021. “A Study on Metaverse Culture Contents Matching Platforms.” International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology 9: 232–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2021.9.3.232.

Lee, Lik-Hang, and Tristan Braud and Pengyuan Zhou and others. 2021. “All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda.” Journal of Latex Class Files 8 (14): 66 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05352.

MacCallum, Kathryn, and David Parsons. 2019. “Teacher Perspectives on Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential of Metaverse for Learning.” Proceedings of World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, September 16: 21–28.

Nannan, Xi, and Juan Chen and Filipe Gama and others. 2022. “The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload” Information Systems Frontiers: 22 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10244-x.

Narin, Nida. 2021. “A Content Analysis of the Metaverse Articles.” Journal of Metaverse. 1 (1): 17–24.

Pesce, Mark. 2020. Augmented reality: Unboxing tech’s next big thing. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Rospigliosi, Asher. 2022. “Metaverse or Simulacra? Roblox, Minecraft, Meta and the turn to virtual reality for education, socialisation and work.” Interactive Learning Environments 30 (1): 3 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2022899

Ruppert, Evelyn, and Engin Isin and Didier Bigo. 2017. “Data politics.” Big Data & Society 4 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749.

Ryskeldiev, Bektur and Yoichi Ochiai and Michael Cohen and others. 2018. “Distributed Metaverse: Creating Decentralized Blockchain-based Model for Peer-to-peer Sharing of Virtual Spaces for Mixed Reality Applications.” ACM Press the 9th Augmented Human International Conference: 3 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3174910.3174952.

Turkle, Sherry. 1997. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Shuster.

Van der Merwe, David. 2021. “The Metaverse as Virtual Heterotopia.” 3rd World Conference on Research in Social Sciences. Vienna, 22–24 October.

Wickens, Christopher. 1992. “Virtual reality and education.” Proceedings of 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: 842–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1992.271688.

Zhao, Ruoyu, and Zhang Yushu and Lan Rushi and others. 2021. “Metaverse: Security and Privacy Concerns.” Journal of Latex Class Files 14 (8): 7 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.03854.

Zhihan. Lv, and Qiao Liang and Wang Qinjun and others. 2021. “Advanced machine-learning methods for brain-computer interfacing.” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 18, 5: 1688–1698.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

  • PDF (English)

Veröffentlicht

2023-02-23

Zitationsvorschlag

1.
LÓPEZ CAMBRONERO, Marcelo. Metaverse, Religions and Metahumans: A Window to a Hypercontrolled Post-pandemic World. Scientia et Fides. Online. 23 Februar 2023. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 121-135. [Accessed 29 Juni 2025]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2023.010.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Bibliografische Angaben herunterladen
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Ausgabe

Bd. 11 Nr. 1 (2023)

Rubrik

Dossier - Social Control, Postmodernism and Political Community

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2023 Marcelo López Cambronero

Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 897
Number of citations: 0

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 2300-7648

eISSN: 2353-5636

Search

Search

Browse

  • Autor/innenverzeichnis durchblättern
  • Issue archive

User

User

Aktuelle Ausgabe

  • Atom-Logo
  • RSS2-Logo
  • RSS1-Logo

Informationen

  • Für Leser/innen
  • Für Autor/innen
  • Für Bibliothekar/innen

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Sprache

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Metaverse, social control, metahumans, transhumanism
Aufwärts

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop