Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Council
    • Reviewers
    • Review process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Privacy Statement
    • Archiving policy
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Scientia et Fides

Religion explained? Debate regarding the concept of religion as a “natural phenomenon” in Daniel Dennett’s perspective
  • Home
  • /
  • Religion explained? Debate regarding the concept of religion as a “natural phenomenon” in Daniel Dennett’s perspective
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020) /
  4. Articles

Religion explained? Debate regarding the concept of religion as a “natural phenomenon” in Daniel Dennett’s perspective

Authors

  • Alberto Ramírez Téllez Universidad Santo Tomás https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2370-4994
  • Wilson Hernando Soto Urrea Universidad Santo Tomás https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-0544

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2020.004

Keywords

religion, Daniel Dennett, interdisciplinarity, evolution, new atheism

Abstract

The Religion is a fascinating topic despite it has some hurdles. Although the study of its constitution, objective and relevance has been understood with effort for different research fields, most of its meaningful contributions do not get more than refuse each other. This research, which presents the main proposals of the United States philosopher Daniel Dennett about religion as natural phenomenon in contrast with the proposal of distinguished religion philosopher, has as a propose to point the less inhospitable lands, in the center of the debate in which it can be possible, making an interdisciplinary proposal, a less conflictive comprehension about religion that can allow those limits that sometimes are imposed to it in a conclusive way for the scientific convictions, biologists postulates, or even for the metaphysics speculations of some theologist forms.

Author Biography

Alberto Ramírez Téllez, Universidad Santo Tomás

Director Departamento de Humanidades y Formación Integral

References

Alfaro, Juan. 2002. De la cuestión del hombre a la cuestión de Dios. Salamanca: Sígueme.

Appleyard, Bryan. 2004. Understanding the Present: An Alternative History of Science. New York: Tauris Parke.

Aquinas Saint, Thomas. (2006). Latin Text and English Translation, Introductions, Notes, Appendices, and Glossaries. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Boyer, Pascal. 2002. Religion Explained: The Human Instincts that Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. New York: Random House.

Brueggemann, Walter. 2005. Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Brueggemann, Walter. 2007. Teología del Antiguo Testamento. Un juicio a Yahvé: Testimonio, disputa, defensa. Traducido por Francisco Molina de la Torre. Salamanca: Sígueme

Cortina, Adela. 2016. “La conciencia moral desde una perspectiva neuroética. De Darwin a Kant”. Pensamiento 273: 771-788.

Churchland, Patricia. 1992. “Reductionism and Antireductionism in Functionalist Theories of Mind.” In The Philosophy of Mind: Classical Problems/Contemporary Issues edited by Brian Beakley, and Peter Ludlow, 59-68. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Dennett, Daniel. 1999. La peligrosa idea de Darwin: Evolución y significado de la vida. Traducido por Cristóbal Pera. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg

Dennett, Daniel. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Penguin.

Dennett, Daniel. 2004. La evolución de la Libertad. Traducido por Ramón Vilá. Barcelona: Paidós.

Dennett, Daniel. 2006. Dulces sueños: Obstáculos filosóficos para una ciencia de la conciencia. Traducido por Julieta Barba y Silvia Jawerbaum. Buenos Aires: Katz.

Dennett, Daniel. 2007a. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin.

Dennett, Daniel. 2007b. Romper el hechizo: La religión como un fenómeno natural. Traducción Felipe de Brigard. Buenos Aires: Katz.

Dennett, Daniel. 2010. Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge.

Darwin, Daniel. 2014. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster

Dennett, Daniel. 2015. The Ellbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. London: The MIT Press.

Dennett, Daniel 2017a. Consciousness Explained. London: Hachette.

Dennett, Daniel. 2017b. From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Distin, Kate 2005. The Selfish Meme: A Critical Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fraijó, Manuel. 1994. Filosofía de la religión: Estudios y textos. Madrid: Trotta.

Caffarena, José. 1999. Ateísmo moderno: Increencia o indiferencia religiosa. Vol. 8. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.

Guthrie, Stewart. 2007. “Anthropology and Anthropomorphism in Religion.” In Religion, Anthropology and Cognitive Science edited by Harvey Whitehouse, and James Laidlaw, 37-62. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Die Einbeziehung der Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Hoyle, F.; Wickramasinghe, C. 2015. “The Universe and Life: Deductions from the Weak Anthropic Principle.” In Vindication of Cosmic Biology: Tribute to Sir Fred Hoyle (1915-2001) edited by Chandra Wickramasinghe, 325-340. New Jersey: World Scientific

Kay, Alan. 1991. “Computers, Networks and Education.” Scientific American 265, no. 3: 138-149.

Pope Paul VI. 1965. Dogmatic Constitution on the Church. Lumen Gentium. Boston: Pauline Books & Media.

Merchán, Luis. 2015. Walter Benjamin: ¿pesimismo o utopía? Una Lectura de la historia y la sociedad. Bogotá: Universidad Santo Tomás.

Norenzayan, Ara et al. 2016. “The Cultural Evolution of Prosocial Religions.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39: 1-65.

Oviedo, Lluis. 2016. “Religious attitudes and prosocial behavior: a systematic review of published research. Religion”. Brain and Behavior 6: 169-184.

Penrose, Roger. 2004. The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. London: Jonathan Cape.

Penrose, R. 2014. El Camino a la realidad: Una guía completa de las leyes del universo. Traducido por Javier

García Sanz. Barcelona: Debate.

Power, Mick. 2012. Adieu to God: Why Psychology Leads to Atheism. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2009. Supernatural agents: Why we believe in souls, gods, and Buddhas. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ramírez, Alberto. 2015. “El lenguaje en la revelación: performatividad y pragmática”. Theologica Xaveriana 180: 301-325.

Ramírez, Alberto. 2016. “La religión bajo la perspectiva evolucionista de Daniel Dennett”. Análisis 87: 355-373.

Sayés, José. A. 2009. Teología Fundamental: La razón de nuestra esperanza. Valencia: Cultural y Espiritual Popular.

Rahner, Karl. 2008. La gracia como libertad. Barcelona: Herder.

Robbins, Thomas, and Anthony Dick. (Ed.). 1981. In gods we trust: New Patterns of Religious Pluralism in America. New Brunswick: Transaction.

Torres, Andrés. 2000. Fin del cristianismo premoderno: Retos hacia un nuevo horizonte. Santander: Sal Terrae.

Werbick, Jürgen. 2007.Gott verbindlich: Eine theologische Gotteslehre. Freiburg: Herder.

Wathey, John. 2016. The Illusion of God's Presence: The Biological Origins of Spiritual. New York: Prometheus.

Wilson, Edward. 2012. The Social Conquest of Earth. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Wilson, Edward. 2014. The Meaning of Human Existence. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Whitehouse, Harvey. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Walnut Creek: Altamira.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

  • PDF (Español (España))

Published

2019-12-23

How to Cite

1.
RAMÍREZ TÉLLEZ, Alberto and SOTO URREA, Wilson Hernando. Religion explained? Debate regarding the concept of religion as a “natural phenomenon” in Daniel Dennett’s perspective. Scientia et Fides. Online. 23 December 2019. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 77-97. [Accessed 4 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2020.004.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia et Fides

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1942
Number of citations: 2

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 2300-7648

eISSN: 2353-5636

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

religion, Daniel Dennett, interdisciplinarity, evolution, new atheism
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop