Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Zespół Redakcyjny
    • Scientific Council
    • Reviewers
    • Review process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Privacy Statement
    • Archiving policy
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Scientia et Fides

Theology Trying to Make Sense of Natural Disasters: Some Contemporary Theological Perspectives on Natural Evil
  • Home
  • /
  • Theology Trying to Make Sense of Natural Disasters: Some Contemporary Theological Perspectives on Natural Evil
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026) /
  4. Articles: Dossier on Contemporary Theodicy and Natural Disasters

Theology Trying to Make Sense of Natural Disasters

Some Contemporary Theological Perspectives on Natural Evil

Authors

  • Lluis Oviedo (1) Pontifical University Antonianum, Rome; (2) Nicolaus Copernicus Superior School, Krakow https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8189-3311

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2026.010

Keywords

theodicy, religious coping, function of religion, believing, religious evolution, theology of cross

Abstract

Natural disasters present a significant challenge to engaged theology, particularly following the decline of traditional explanations that relied on the model of divine punishment. The ongoing occurrence of such catastrophes has become a scandal and is frequently used as a critique of divine providence and goodness. In response, theology has moved beyond earlier models to develop more nuanced answers, drawing on alternative frameworks that offer greater flexibility and depth, after considering merits and flaws of available theodicies. This article reviews contemporary theological approaches to the problem of natural disasters and explores new opportunities provided by research on the function of religion, religious coping mechanisms, and the processes of belief.

Author Biography

Lluis Oviedo, (1) Pontifical University Antonianum, Rome; (2) Nicolaus Copernicus Superior School, Krakow

Theology, Full Professor

References

Abbott, Roger Philip. 2019. “‘I Will Show You My Faith by My Works’: Addressing the Nexus between Philosophical Theodicy and Human Suffering and Loss in Contexts of ‘Natural’ Disaster.” Religions 10 (3): 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1003021.

Alimonti, G., and Mariani, L. 2023. “Is the number of global natural disasters increasing?” Environmental Hazards 23 (2): 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2023.2239807.

Armstrong, Karen. 2022. Sacred Nature: How We Can Recover Our Bond with the Natural World. London: The Bodley Head.

Betenson, Toby. 2016. “Anti-Theodicy.” Philosophy Compass 11 (1): 56–65.

Chester, David K. 2005. “Theology and Disaster Studies: The Need for Dialogue.” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 146 (4): 319–28.

Chester, David K., and Angus M. Duncan. 2009. “Responding to Disasters within the Christian Tradition, with Reference to Volcanic Eruptions and Earthquakes.” Religion 40 (2): 85–95.

Entwistle, David N., Scott K. Moroney, and Julie Aten. 2018. “Integrative Reflections on Disasters, Suffering, and the Practice of Spiritual and Emotional Care.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 46 (1): 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091647117750658.

Garssen, B., Visser, A., & Pool, G. 2020. “Does spirituality or religion positively affect mental health? Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies”. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 31 (1): 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1729570.

Gregersen, Niels Henrik. 2015. “Theology and Disaster Studies: From 'Acts of God' to Divine Presence.” In Disaster Research: Multidisciplinary and International Perspectives, edited by Rasmus Dahlberg, Olivier Rubin, and Morten Thanning Vendelø, 34–48. London: Routledge.

Gregersen, Niels Henrik. 2017. “Positive Loss and Tragic Memory: On the Preservation of Community.” Dialog 56: 361–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12356.

Hardwick, Joseph, and Randall Stephens. 2020. “Acts of God: Continuities and Change in Christian Responses to Extreme Weather Events from Early Modernity to the Present.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11 (2): e631.

Hart, David Bentley. 2005. The Doors of the Sea: Where Was God in the Tsunami? Grand Rapids, Michigan: W.B. Eerdmans.

Hick, John. 1985. Evil and the God of Love. London: Macmillan.

Koenig, Harold G. 2008. In the Wake of Disaster: Religious Responses to Terrorism and Catastrophe. Templeton Foundation Press.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1977. Funktion der Religion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Lumbreras, Sara, Lluis Oviedo and Peter Jeavons. 2026. “The Design Argument Revisited through Evolutionary Computation: Imperfection, Robustness and Creative Emergence.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 61 (1): 221–39. https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.24840.

Moltmann, Jürgen. 1974. The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology. New York: Harper & Row.

Murphy, Nancey. 2007. “Science and the Problem of Evil: Suffering as a By-Product of a Finely Turned Cosmos.” In Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, edited by Robert John Russell and William R. Stoeger, 131–52. Vatican City; Berkeley, California: Vatican Observatory; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

O'Mathúna, Dónal P. 2018. “Christian Theology and Disasters: Where Is God in All This?” In Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories, edited by Dónal P. O'Mathúna et al., Advancing Global Bioethics 11.

Oord, Thomas Jay. 2009. “An Open Theology Doctrine of Creation and Solution to the Problem of Evil.” Creation Made Free: Open Theology Engaging Science, 28–52.

Oviedo, Lluis. 2024. “Theology and Cultural Evolution.” In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, edited by Brendan N. Wolfe et al. https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/TheologyandCulturalEvolution.

Oviedo, Lluis. 2025. “Comments to the Article ‘The Gods as Latent Causes: A Statistical Inference Theory of Religion,’ by Francesco Rigoli and Jack Lennon.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2025.2491889.

Pargament, K. I. 1997. The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Phillips, Dewi Zephaniah. 2004, The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God. London: SCM Press.

Plantinga, Alvin. 1977. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans.

Rigoli, Francesco, and Jack Lennon. 2024. “The Gods as Latent Causes: A Statistical Inference Theory of Religion.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 1–26.

Ritchie, Hannah and Pablo Rosado. 2024. “Is the number of natural disasters increasing?” Published online at OurWorldinData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/disaster-database-limitations.

Sawada, Yasuyuki, and Yoshito Takasaki. 2017. “Natural disaster, poverty, and development: An introduction.” World Development, 94: 2–15.

Sollereder, Bethany N. 2021. “Compassionate Theodicy: A Suggested Truce Between Intellectual and Practical Theodicy.” Modern Theology 3 (2): 382–95.

Southgate, Christopher. 2008. The Groaning of Creation: God, Evolution, and the Problem of Sin. London: Westminster John Knox Press.

Southgate, Christopher. 2018. Theology in a Suffering World: Glory and Longing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swinburne, Richard. 1988. “Does theism need a theodicy?” Canadian journal of philosophy 18 (2): 287–311.

Swinton, John. 2007. Raging with Compassion: Pastoral Responses to the Problem of Evil. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Tilley, Terrence W. 1991. The Evils of Theodicy. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Trakakis, Nick. 2008. “Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?” Sophia 47: 161–91.

White, Robert S. 2014. Who Is to Blame?: Disasters, Nature and Acts of God. Oxford: Monarch Books.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-04-16

How to Cite

1.
OVIEDO, Lluis. Theology Trying to Make Sense of Natural Disasters: Some Contemporary Theological Perspectives on Natural Evil. Scientia et Fides. Online. 16 April 2026. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 223-242. [Accessed 18 April 2026]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2026.010.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Articles: Dossier on Contemporary Theodicy and Natural Disasters

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Lluis Oviedo Oviedo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 26
Number of citations: 0

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 2300-7648

eISSN: 2353-5636

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

theodicy, religious coping, function of religion, believing, religious evolution, theology of cross
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop