Salta al contenuto principale Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al piè di pagina del sito
  • Registrazione
  • Login
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Ultimo fascicolo
  • Archivi
  • Avvisi
  • Info
    • Sulla rivista
    • Proposte
    • Comitato Scientifico ed Editoriale
    • Scientific Council
    • Reviewers
    • Review process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Dichiarazione sulla privacy
    • Archiving policy
    • Contatti
  • Registrazione
  • Login
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Scientia et Fides

Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence
  • Home
  • /
  • Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence
  1. Home /
  2. Archivi /
  3. V. 6 N. 2 (2018) /
  4. Articles

Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence

Autori

  • Brian Patrick Green Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Faculty (adj.), School of Engineering, Santa Clara University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7125-3086

Parole chiave

ethics, theology, religion, science, technology

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology presents a multitude of ethical concerns, many of which are being actively considered by organizations ranging from small groups in civil society to large corporations and governments. However, it also presents ethical concerns which are not being actively considered. This paper presents a broad overview of twelve topics in ethics in AI, including function, transparency, evil use, good use, bias, unemployment, socio-economic inequality, moral automation and human de-skilling, robot consciousness and rights, dependency, social-psychological effects, and spiritual effects. Each of these topics will be given a brief discussion, though each deserves much deeper consideration.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Allen, Colin, Gary Varner & Jason Zinser. 2010. “Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent.” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12, Issue 3, 09 Nov, Pages 251–261.

Amodei, Dario, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané. 2016. “Concrete problems in AI safety.” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1606.06565. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565

Angwin, Julia, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. “Machine Bias.” ProPublica, May 23. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

Aristotle. 1908. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W. D. Ross. Book VI, Ch. 8. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.6.vi.html

Arkin, Ronald. 2009. Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

Arnold, Thomas, Daniel Kasenberg, and Matthias Scheutz. 2017. “Value Alignment or Misalignment – What Will Keep Systems Accountable?” Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://hrilab.tufts.edu/publications/aaai17-alignment.pdf

Barron, Robert. 2015. “The ‘Waze’ of Providence.” Word on Fire, website. December 1. https://www.wordonfire.org/resources/article/the-waze-of-providence/4997/

Bossmann, Julia. 2016. “Top 9 ethical issues in artificial intelligence.” World Economic Forum: Global Agenda, 21 Oct. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/10/top-10-ethical-issues-in-artificial-intelligence/

Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BBC. 2015. “Google Apologises for Photos App's Racist Blunder.” BBC News. 1 July. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-33347866

Caliskan, Aylin, Joanna J. Bryson, Arvind Narayanan. 2017 “Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases” Science 356, Issue 6334 (14 April) pp. 183–186.

Cannon, Lincoln. 2015. “What is Mormon Transhumanism?” Theology and Science 13:2, pp. 202–218.

Chella, Antonio, & Ricardo Manzotti. 2013. Artificial Consciousness. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.

Chrisley, Ron. 2008. “Philosophical foundations of artificial consciousness.” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 44, Issue 2 (October): 119–137

Evans, Richard, and Jim Gao. 2016. “DeepMind AI Reduces Google Data Centre Cooling Bill by 40%.” DeepMind Blog, 20 July. https://deepmind.com/blog/deepmind-ai-reduces-google-data-centre-cooling-bill-40/

Floridi, Luciano, and Jeff W. Sanders. 2004. On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and machines 14, Issue 3 (August 1) pp. 349–379

Future of Life Institute. 2017. “Asilomar AI Principles.” Principles 7 and 8. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/

Gips, J. 1994. “Towards the Ethical Robot.” In Android Epistemology, edited by Kenneth M. Ford, C. Glymour & Patrick Hayes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Green, Brian Patrick. 2018b. “The Technology of Holiness: A Response to Hava Tirosh-Samuelson.” Theology and Science 16:2, 223–228.

Green, Brian Patrick. 2018a. “Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Twelve Areas of Interest.” Pope John XXIII Memorial Lecture, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California, March 21.

Green, Brian Patrick. 2017c. “Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Ten Areas of Interest.” All about Ethics Blog. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, website. November 21. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/all-about-ethics/artificial-intelligence-and-ethics/

Green, Brian Patrick. 2017b. “Some Ethical and Theological Reflections on Artificial Intelligence.” Conference paper delivered to the Pacific Coast Theological Society, at the Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, California, November 3. http://www.pcts.org/meetings/2017/PCTS2017Nov-Green-ReflectionsAI.pdf

Green, Brian Patrick. 2017a. “The Catholic Church and Technological Progress: Past, Present, and Future.” Religions 8(6), 106. http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/6/106/htm

Harris, Mark. 2017. “Inside the First Church of Artificial Intelligence.” Wired (November 15). https://www.wired.com/story/anthony-levandowski-artificial-intelligence-religion/

John XXIII. 1963. Pacem in Terris; Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Available online: http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-xxiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_11041963_pacem.html

Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Joy, Bill. 2000. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” Wired, April 1. http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html

Koene, Randal A. 2013. “Uploading to Substrate‐Independent Minds.” Chapter 14 in The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, edited by Max More and Natasha Vita‐More. New York: Wiley.

Konev, Boris, and Alexei Lisitsa. 2014. “A SAT Attack on the Erdos Discrepancy Conjecture.” arXiv.org, 17 February. arXiv:1402.2184v2

Kurzweil, Ray. 2012. How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed. New York: Penguin.

Labrecque, Cory Andrew. 2017. “The Glorified Body: Corporealities in the Catholic Tradition.” Religions, 8(9), pp. 166. http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/9/166/htm

Leviathan, Yaniv, and Yossi Matias. 2018. “Google Duplex: An AI System for Accomplishing Real-World Tasks Over the Phone.” Google AI Blog, May 8. https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html

Mannion, Lee. 2018. “Britain appoints minister for loneliness amid growing isolation.” Reuters. January 17. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-politics-health/britain-appoints-minister-for-loneliness-amid-growing-isolation-idUSKBN1F61I6

Martin, Mike W., & Roland Schinzinger. 2010. Introduction to Engineering Ethics, Second Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Mozur, Paul. 2017. “Google’s AlphaGo Defeats Chinese Go Master in Win for A.I.” The New York Times. May 23. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/23/business/google-deepmind-alphago-go-champion-defeat.html

Mukherjee, Siddhartha. 2017. “A.I. versus M.D.: What happens when diagnosis is automated?” New Yorker. April 3. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/03/ai-versus-md

Partnership on AI. 2018b. Safety-Critical Working Group Meeting, San Francisco, USA, May 24.

Partnership on AI. 2018a. “Thematic Pillars.” Partnership on AI website. https://www.partnershiponai.org/thematic-pillars/

Partnership on AI. 2017. Inaugural Meeting, Berlin, Germany, October 23.

Platt, John R. 2016. “A Starfish-Killing, Artificially Intelligent Robot Is Set to Patrol the Great Barrier Reef.” Scientific American. January 1. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-starfish-killing-artificially-intelligent-robot-is-set-to-patrol-the-great-barrier-reef/

Schlagel, Richard H. 1999. “Why not Artificial Consciousness or Thought?” Minds and Machines 9, Issue 1 (February): pp 3–28

Searle, John R. 1980. ‘Mind, brains, and programs.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3.3, pp. 417–457.

Strathern, Marilyn. 1997. “‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system.” European Review 5, No. 03 (July): 305 – 321. http://conferences.asucollegeoflaw.com/sciencepublicsphere/files/2014/02/Strathern1997-2.pdf

Tufekci, Zeynep. 2018. “YouTube, the Great Radicalizer.” The New York Times, March 10. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/10/opinion/sunday/youtube-politics-radical.html

Vallor, Shannon. 2016. Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. New York: Oxford University Press.

Vallor, Shannon. 2015. “Moral Deskilling and Upskilling in a New Machine Age: Reflections on the Ambiguous Future of Character.” Philosophy of Technology 28:107–124.

Van Parijs, Philippe, and Yannick Vanderborght. 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy, 1st Edition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univerrsity Press, 2017).

Yirka, Bob. 2014. “Computer generated math proof is too large for humans to check.” Phys.org, website. February 19. https://phys.org/news/2014-02-math-proof-large-humans.html

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

  • PDF (English)

Pubblicato

2018-10-09

Come citare

1.
GREEN, Brian Patrick. Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence. Scientia et Fides. Online. 9 ottobre 2018. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9-31. [Accessed 3 luglio 2025].
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Scarica citazione
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Fascicolo

V. 6 N. 2 (2018)

Sezione

Articles

Licenza

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 3353
Number of citations: 11

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 2300-7648

eISSN: 2353-5636

Search

Search

Browse

  • Scorri l'indice per Autori
  • Issue archive

User

User

Ultimo numero

  • Lodo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informazioni

  • per i lettori
  • Per gli autori
  • Per i bibliotecari

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Lingua

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

ethics, theology, religion, science, technology
Su

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop