Hacia una política de la discapacidad encarnada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2022.011Keywords
social model of disability, functional diversity, Alasdair MacIntyre, normal, body, animalAbstract
Towards a politics of embodied disability
The political treatment of disability has received a new impulse during the second half of twentieth Century. Within this impulse, the so named “social model of disability” supports that disability is a social construct, derived from the oppression that a capitalist society exercises over a minority with impairments. Thus, the social model of disability establishes a radical dichotomy between impairment and disability which relegates our corporal condition to the shadow of the discussion. Soon, within the disability studies field grew critical voices alerting that the social model leads to a disembodied disability. In a different context of the disability studies, Alasdair Macintyre makes a suggestive proposal by radicalizing human being´s animal condition as well as his social dimension. It is worth exploring this line of inquiry to arrive to a truly embodied vision of disability.
References
Asla, Mariano, 2019. “Acerca de los límites, imperfecciones y males de la condición humana: El biomejoramiento desde una perspectiva tomista”, Scientia et Fides 7 (2), 77–95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2019.01.
Canimas Brugué, Joan. 2015. “¿Discapacidad o diversidad funcional?”. Siglo Cero. Revista Española sobre discapacidad intelectual 46 (2): 79–97.
De la Torre Díaz, Javier. 2012. “Treinta años tras la virtud”. Proyección 246: 303–23.
Ferreira, Miguel Ángel V. 2010. “De la minus-valía a la diversidad funcional: un nuevo marco teórico-metodológico”. Política y Sociedad 47 (1): 45–65.
Flórez, Jesús. 2016, “Neurodiversidad, discapacidad e inteligencias múltiples”, Revista síndrome de Down 33: 59–64.
Hughes, Bill., & Paterson, Kevin. 2008. “El modelo social de discapacidad y la desaparición del cuerpo: hacia una sociología del impedimento”. En Superar las barreras de la discapacidad: 18 años de "Disability and society”, coord. por Len Barton, 107–23. Madrid: Ed Morata.
Liedo Fernández, Belén y Rueda, Jon. 2021. “In defence of posthuman vulnerability”. Scientia et Fides 9 (1): 215–39.
Lombo, José Ángel y Giménez Amaya, José Manuel. 2016, Biología y racionalidad. El carácter distintivo del cuerpo humano, Pamplona: Eunsa.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2001. Animales racionales y dependientes. Por qué los seres humanos necesitamos las virtudes, Barcelona: Paidós.
Moscoso, Melania. 2011. “La discapacidad como diversidad funcional”, Dilemata 7: 77–92.
Palacios, Agustina y Romañach, Javier. 2006. El modelo de la diversidad: la bioética y los derechos humanos como herramientas para alcanzar la plena dignidad en la diversidad funcional. Madrid: Diversitas– AIES.
Rodríguez Díaz, Susana y Ferreira, Miguel Ángel V. 2010a. “Diversidad funcional: Sobre lo normal y lo patológico en torno a la condición social de la dis-capacidad”. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales 28 (1): 151–72.
Rodríguez Díaz, Susana y Ferreira, Miguel Ángel V. 2010b. “Desde la dis-capacidad hacia la diversidad funcional. Un ejercicio de dis-normalización”. Revista internacional de sociología 68 (2): 289–309.
Romañach, Javier y Lobato, Manuel. 2005. “Diversidad Funcional, nuevo término para la lucha por la dignidad en la diversidad del ser humano”, website Foro de Vida independiente, 26 de julio de 2009 http://forovidaindependiente.org/diversidad-funcional-nuevo-termino-para-la-lucha-por-la-dignidad-en-la-diversidad-del-ser-humano/ No obstante, en dicha entrada se puede descargar el texto en pdf fechado en mayo de 2005, que es el que utilizo como referencia.
Shakespeare, Tom y Watson, Nicholas. 2002. “The social model of disability: an outdated ideology?”. Research in Social Science and Disability 2: 9–28.
The Union of The Physically Impaired against Segregation (UPIAS) And The Disability Alliance. 1975. Disponible en University of Leeds. Centre for Disability Studies Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2021 https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/library/author/upias/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Francisco Santamaría Egurrola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 1387
Number of citations: 0