Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Principles of ethics in publishing
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Review process
    • Editorial Team
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Studia Iuridica Toruniensia

Out of constituent guarantees protecting professional secrecy in the practice of the attorney under US law
  • Home
  • /
  • Out of constituent guarantees protecting professional secrecy in the practice of the attorney under US law
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 30 (2022): Vol. 30 /
  4. Studies and articles

Out of constituent guarantees protecting professional secrecy in the practice of the attorney under US law

Authors

  • Paula Białkowska University of Lodz, Center for Design, Fashion and Advertisement Law of University of Silesia, Katowice https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4639-3001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2022.001

Keywords

guarantees, legal ethics, criminal procedure, privileges of evidence, attorney-client privilege

Abstract

The subject of the article is the types and characteristics of guarantees created to protect legal professional secrecy in the USA. It is inseparable from its character and role in the performance of the legal profession. These guarantees are one of the most important factors in the protection of legal professional confidentiality – crucial not only for the client, the lawyer himself, the client, but also for the entire legal protection system. The attention was paid primarily to non-constitutional guarantees protecting professional confidentiality: legal ethics and the so-called evidence privileges. The increased need to protect the right to privacy was also underlined. The main purpose of the article is to present the function and role of legal provisions placed outside the US Constitution, which not only provide a kind of envelope for the sources resulting from the Amendment to the Constitution, but also as its core. It seems that both the Model Rules of Professional Conduct act and the evidentiary privileges constitute sets of principles that are key to professional confidentiality under American law.

References

Barkett J.M., Evidence Rule 502: The Solution to the Privilege-Protection Puzzle in the Digital Era, “Fordham Law Review” 2013, Vol. 81, Issue 4.

del Carmen R.V., Criminal Procedure. Law and Practice, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning 2004.

Imwinkelried E.J., An Hegelian Approach to Privileges under Federal Rule of Evidence 501: The Restrictive Thesis, the Expansive Antithesis, and the Contextual Synthesis, “Nebraska Law Review” 1994, Vol. 73, Issue 3.

Ingram J.L., Criminal Evidence, LexisNexis 2009.

Jurzyk M., Prawna ochrona tajemnicy spowiedzi w Stanach Zjednoczonych, „Kwartalnik Prawa Publicznego” 2001, No. 1/2.

Krauland E.J. and Cribb T.H., The attorney-client privilege in the United States. An age-old principle under modern pressures, “Symposium Issue of the Professional Lawyer” 2003.

McClellan Marshall J., Ewolucja przywileju poufności adwokat – klient w sądownictwie angloamerykańskim, w: Etyka zawodów prawniczych w praktyce. Relacje na sali rozpraw, ed. G. Borkowski, Lublin 2013.

Stern M.D., Hoffman D., Privileged informers: The attorney subpoena problem and proposal for reform, “University of Pennsylvania Law Review”1988, Vol. 136, Issue 6.

Zacharias F.C., Harmonizing privilege and confidentiality, “Public Law and Legal Theory” 1998, No. 13, San Diego.

Zeidman S., Who Needs an Evidence Code?: The New York Court of Appeals’ Radical Reevaluation of Hearsay, New York 1999.

Studia Iuridica Toruniensia

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2022-09-28

How to Cite

1.
BIAŁKOWSKA, Paula. Out of constituent guarantees protecting professional secrecy in the practice of the attorney under US law. Studia Iuridica Toruniensia. Online. 28 September 2022. Vol. 30, pp. 13-30. [Accessed 8 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/SIT.2022.001.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 30 (2022): Vol. 30

Section

Studies and articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Paula Maria Białkowska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 446
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

guarantees, legal ethics, criminal procedure, privileges of evidence, attorney-client privilege
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop