Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Principles of ethics in publishing
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Review process
    • Editorial Team
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Studia Iuridica Toruniensia

Reasons to obey or disobey the law: pragmatic necessity of recourse to the legitimacy of the law-implementing institutions and procedural justice
  • Home
  • /
  • Reasons to obey or disobey the law: pragmatic necessity of recourse to the legitimacy of the law-implementing institutions and procedural justice
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 27 (2020): Tom XXVII /
  4. Studies and articles

Reasons to obey or disobey the law: pragmatic necessity of recourse to the legitimacy of the law-implementing institutions and procedural justice

Authors

  • Wojciech Lamentowicz University of Business and Administration, Gdynia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-090X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2020.026

Keywords

obedience to the law, trust in institutions, legitimacy of the law implementing institutions, procedural justice, substantive justice

Abstract

I wanted to show that there is a strong empirical evidence that obedience to the law is based rather on procedural justice than on substantive justice, because the assessment of substantive justice of the law requires a very sophisticated normative reasoning. Procedural justice is comprehensible by a common sense based on practical experience of citizens who deal with the law executing institutions such as the police and the courts. The intermediary variable is the legitimacy of the law executing institutions such as the police and the courts. Due to a low level of trust and approval of the law-making institutions such as parliaments and governments their legitimacy is questionable, and thus the law makers cannot foster the moral duty to obey the law among subjects to the law.

References

Adams R., The expressive powers of law: theories and limits, Cambridge MA 2015. http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/why-do-people-obey-law (access:15.4.2020).

Blader S.I., Tyler T.R., A four component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a ‘fair’ proces, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin” 2003, Vol. 29.

Brockner J., Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favourability, „Academy of Management Review” 2002, Vol. 27.

Brockner J., Wiesenfeld B.M., The interactive impact of procedural and outcome fairness on reactions to a decision,“Psychological Bulletin” 1996, No. 120.

Deutsch M., Justice and conflict, in: The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, eds. M. Deutsch, P.T. Coleman, San Francisco 2000.

Hough M., Jackson J., Bradford, B. Legitimacy, trust and compliance: An empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European social survey’, in: Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration, eds. J. Tankebe, A. Liebling, Oxford 2013.

Johnson C. Trust in the military exceeds trust in other institutions in Western Europe and the U.S., September 2018, Pew Research Center.

Lind E.A., Tyler T.R., The social psychology of procedural justice, New York 1988.

Procedural justice, Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service, Published 17 June 2019, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/procedural-justice (access: 20.8.2020).

Solum L.B., Procedural justice, “Southern California Law Review” 2004–2005, Vol. 78.

Tyler T.R., Rasinski K., Spodick N., Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 1985, No. 48.

Tyler T.R., Why people obey the law, New Haven 1990.

Tyler T.R., Boeckmann R.J., Smith H.J., Huo Y.J., Social justice in a diverse society, Boulder 1997.

Tyler T.R., Huo Y.J., Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts, New York 2002.

Studia Iuridica Toruniensia

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2021-07-18

How to Cite

1.
LAMENTOWICZ, Wojciech. Reasons to obey or disobey the law: pragmatic necessity of recourse to the legitimacy of the law-implementing institutions and procedural justice. Studia Iuridica Toruniensia. Online. 18 July 2021. Vol. 27, pp. 163-186. [Accessed 16 March 2026]. DOI 10.12775/SIT.2020.026.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 27 (2020): Tom XXVII

Section

Studies and articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1660
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

obedience to the law, trust in institutions, legitimacy of the law implementing institutions, procedural justice, substantive justice
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop