Applying the institution of actio in rem in British and American maritime law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2017.017Keywords
actio in rem, actio in personam, maritime law, realization of property right on the ship, proceedings against the shipAbstract
This paper raises the question of the use of the Roman institution – actio in rem in modern maritime law in Anglo-Saxon countries – Great Britain and the United States. It is important to draw attention to the understanding and the method as to how actio in rem against the vessel is used in shipping relations of common law system countries. The discussed institution has in fact evolved and the way of using it diFers from the original Roman way, as it is now used in maritime claims, mainly in maritime privilege. An indication of the usage of actio in rem in common law countries is seen in the possibility of seizure of the arrest of a ship in the in rem mode in connection with the investigation issued in maritime claims.References
Berlingieri F., Arrest of Ships, A Commentary on the 1952 and 1999 Convention, London 1992.
Cheshire G.C., North P., Fawcett J.J., Private International Law, Oxford 2008.
Duck A., De Usu et Authiritate Juris Civilis Romanorum in Dominiis Principium Christianorum libri duo, Lipsiae 1668, II, 8,398: [Ius enim Civile tantum valere in ha Curia, secluso Jure Muncipali, Iuriconsulti nostrates confetiunt].
Force R., Yiannoppoulos A.N., Davis M., Maritime and Admiralty Law, Washington 1996.
Friedell S.F., Benedict on Admiralty, New York 1999.
Godolphin J., View of the Admiralty Jurisdiction, London 1661.
Goethe J. W., Eckermann J.P., Conversations of Goethe with Johann Peter Eckermann, London 1930.
Grzegorczyk P., Immunitet państwa w postępowaniu cywilnym, Warszawa 2010.
Hill Ch., Sothering K., Hosoi T., Helmer Ch., Arrest of Ships-1, England and Wales; Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, USA, London 1985.
Holdsworth W., A History of English law, vol. V, London 1973.
Kochanowski K., „Areszt statku morskiego”, Gdańsk 2008, niepublikowane.
Mandaraka-Sheppard A., Modern Maritime Law (Volume 1): Jurisdiction and Risks (Maritime and Transport Law Library), Oxford 2013.
Mankabady S., The law of collision at sea, New York, 1978.
Marzec Ł., Czy prawo rzymskie pokonało kanał La Manche?, Krakowskie Studia z Teorii Państwa i Prawa, t. 2, Kraków 2008.
Meeson N., The practice and procedure of the Admiralty Court, London, 1986.
Oxford Dictionary of Law, Oxford–New York 1996.
Shaw R., The International Conference on Arrest of Ships 1999, “P&I Internationl” 2/2000.
Sonnenberger H.J., Inländische Gerichtsbarkeit über ausländische Staaten und sonstige öWentlich-rechtliche Rechtsträger. Die neuere Entwicklung der Rechtsprechung in Frankreich, England und in Deutschland, AcP 1963, t. 162.
Tetley W., Q.C. Arrest, Attachment and Related Maritime Law Procedures, “Tulane Law Reviev I.” 1895–1985.
Tokarczyk R., Prawo amerykańskie, Kraków 2003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 1429
Number of citations: 0
