Notification to the taxpayer of the suspension of the limitation period as a result of the commencement of fiscal criminal proceedings in the light of performative theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2023.021Keywords
limitation of the tax liability, suspension of the limitation period of the tax liability, notification of the taxpayer about the suspension of the limitation period, theory of performativesAbstract
According to Art. 70 § 6 point 1 of the Act of August 29, 1997, the Tax Ordinance, the limitation period for a tax liability does not start, and a started one is suspended on the date of initiation of proceedings in matters of a revenue offence or a revenue petty offence of which the taxpayer has been notified, provided that the suspicion of the offence or petty offence is linked with the non-performance of the obligation. On the other hand, the issue of notifying the taxpayer referred to in that provision has been regulated in Art. 70c of this act. This provision provides that the tax authority competent for the tax obligation, of which the failure to fulfill results in a suspicion of committing a fiscal offence or a fiscal petty offence, shall notify the taxpayer that the period of limitation of the tax obligation has not begun to run or has been suspended and of the fact that the period of limitation will begin to run or will continue to run after the lapse of the suspension period.
The subject of the article is the analysis of the latter provision. The authors attempt to determine which authority and how should notify the taxpayer of the non-start or suspension of the limitation period. At the same time, in the process of analysis, an attempt was made to use the theory of performatives. It turned out that the application of this theory to the analysis of the notification of the suspension of the limitation significantly supported the process of interpreting the provision of Art. 70c of the Tax Ordinance Act. It made it easier to select all those elements that are important for determining whether the conventional act, which is the notification of the taxpayer, was made fortuitously, and thus whether it had effects in law. In the light of Art. 70c of the Tax Ordinance, these elements include:
- a precondition, which is the initiation of penal proceedings, the purpose of which is to determine whether a fiscal offence or a fiscal petty offence has been committed and not to suspend the running of the limitation period;
- notification by the authority competent to collect the tax of the suspension of the limitation period;
- including in the notification information that the limitation period has been suspended as a result of the initiation of penal proceedings;
- preparation of the notification in writing, and then delivery of the letter to the taxpayer in accordance with the rules set out in art. 144 et seq. Tax Ordinance Act;
- delivery of the notification to the taxpayer no later than 5 years from the end of the tax year in which the tax payment deadline expired;
- directing the notification directly to the taxpayer.
Failure to meet any of these conditions means that the notification act has no effect in the form of a suspension of the limitation period.
References
Austin J.L., How to Do Things with Words, Oxford 1962.
Gutowski M., O regułach dokonywania czynności prawnych, „Państwo i Prawo” 2010, nr 8.
Iserzon E., Starościak J., Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz, teksty, wzory i formularze, Warszawa 1970.
Jaśkowska M., Wróbel A., Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego, Kraków 2000.
Kalinowski M., Kilka uwag o pojęciu obowiązku i zobowiązania podatkowego w ordynacji podatkowej z 1934 roku, „Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2012, nr 4.
Kalinowski M., Pojęcie obowiązku i zobowiązania podatkowego w przepisach ogólnych prawa podatkowego w okresie powojennym, „Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2013, nr 2.
Kmieciak Z., Czynności faktyczne administracji państwowej, „Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne” 1987, t. 39.
Łukomski Ł., Skuteczność formalna i materialna performatywu, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica” 2015, nr 75.
Ordynacja podatkowa. Komentarz praktyczny, red. B. Brzeziński, M. Kalinowski, A. Olesińska, Gdańsk 2017.
Patryas M., Performatywy w prawie, Poznań 2005.
Ziembiński Z., Logiczne podstawy prawoznawstwa, Warszawa 1966.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bogumił Brzeziński, Marek Kalinowski
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 169
Number of citations: 0