Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Principles of ethics in publishing
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Review process
    • Editorial Team
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Studia Iuridica Toruniensia

Developmental tendencies of the European Union’s antitrust law enforcement policy on digital markets – from the European Commission’s decision in the Google cases to the sectoral regulation
  • Home
  • /
  • Developmental tendencies of the European Union’s antitrust law enforcement policy on digital markets – from the European Commission’s decision in the Google cases to the sectoral regulation
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 32 No. 1 (2023) /
  4. Studies and articles

Developmental tendencies of the European Union’s antitrust law enforcement policy on digital markets – from the European Commission’s decision in the Google cases to the sectoral regulation

Authors

  • Marek Kolasiński Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-5654

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2023.005

Keywords

Google, competition law, cyber market

Abstract

The article identifies developmental tendencies in the European Union’s antitrust law enforcement policy on digital markets. The author begins his argument by outlining a series of the European Commission’s decisions regarding Google’s market practices and by analysing the theoretical and legal assumptions on which the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in the Google Shopping case is based, and subsequently attempts to present the market effects of the actions in question undertaken by the EU’s competition authorities. The author is sceptical about the economic effectiveness of the European Commission’s decisions and draws attention to the risks associated with increasing antitrust interventionism. In particular, the publication indicates the risk of excessive relaxation of the analytical discipline in antitrust cases. However, the article expresses the approval for legislative actions aimed at including digital markets in sectoral regulation. The author believes that such a solution will make it possible to achieve generally accepted public goals, and does not pose threats related to further tightening of the antitrust law enforcement policy.

References

Byrne D., Compulsory licensing of IP rights: Has EC competition law reached a clear and rational analysis following the IMS judgment and the Microsoft decision?, “Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice” 2007, No. 5.

Caro A., Leveraging market power online: the Google Shopping case, “Competition Law Journal” 2018, No. 1.

Gerardin D., Limiting the scope of article 82 EC: what can the EU learn from the US Supreme Court`s judgment in Trinko in the wake of Microsoft, IMS, and Deutsche Telekom, “Common Market Law Review” 2004, Vol. 41.

Heinemann A., Compulsory Licences and Product Integration in European Competition Law – Assessement of the European Commission’s Microsoft Decision, “International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law” 2005, No. 1.

Hoppner T., Google’s (Non-) Compliance with the EU Shopping Decision a study based upon empirical data of 25 comparison shopping services, September 2020, https://www.hausfeld.com/uploads/documents/googles_(non)_compliance_with_google_search_(shopping).pdf.

Lang J.T., Mandating Access: The Principles and the Problems in Intellectual Property and Competition Policy, “European Business Law Review” 2004.

Meyer D., More Fines Incoming? Google’s Solution to Its EU Antitrust Woes Is ‘Meaningless’, Rivals Claim, Fortune, November 22, 2018, https://fortune.com/2018/11/22/google-eu-antitrust-solution-meaningless.

Vesterdorf B., Theories of Self-Preferencing and Duty to Deal – Two Sides of the Same Coin, “Competition Law & Policy Debate” 2015 Vol. 1, No. 1.

Vesterdorf B., Fountoukakos K., An appraisal of the remedy in the Commission’s Google Search (Shopping) decision and a guide to its interpretation in light of an analytical reading of the case law, “Journal of European Competition Law & Practice” 2017, No. 1.

Studia Iuridica Toruniensia

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2023-09-26

How to Cite

1.
KOLASIŃSKI, Marek. Developmental tendencies of the European Union’s antitrust law enforcement policy on digital markets – from the European Commission’s decision in the Google cases to the sectoral regulation. Studia Iuridica Toruniensia. Online. 26 September 2023. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 101-118. [Accessed 24 May 2025]. DOI 10.12775/SIT.2023.005.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Studies and articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Marek Kolasiński

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 333
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Google, competition law, cyber market
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop