Out of constituent guarantees protecting professional secrecy in the practice of the attorney under US law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2022.001Keywords
guarantees, legal ethics, criminal procedure, privileges of evidence, attorney-client privilegeAbstract
The subject of the article is the types and characteristics of guarantees created to protect legal professional secrecy in the USA. It is inseparable from its character and role in the performance of the legal profession. These guarantees are one of the most important factors in the protection of legal professional confidentiality – crucial not only for the client, the lawyer himself, the client, but also for the entire legal protection system. The attention was paid primarily to non-constitutional guarantees protecting professional confidentiality: legal ethics and the so-called evidence privileges. The increased need to protect the right to privacy was also underlined. The main purpose of the article is to present the function and role of legal provisions placed outside the US Constitution, which not only provide a kind of envelope for the sources resulting from the Amendment to the Constitution, but also as its core. It seems that both the Model Rules of Professional Conduct act and the evidentiary privileges constitute sets of principles that are key to professional confidentiality under American law.
References
Barkett J.M., Evidence Rule 502: The Solution to the Privilege-Protection Puzzle in the Digital Era, “Fordham Law Review” 2013, Vol. 81, Issue 4.
del Carmen R.V., Criminal Procedure. Law and Practice, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning 2004.
Imwinkelried E.J., An Hegelian Approach to Privileges under Federal Rule of Evidence 501: The Restrictive Thesis, the Expansive Antithesis, and the Contextual Synthesis, “Nebraska Law Review” 1994, Vol. 73, Issue 3.
Ingram J.L., Criminal Evidence, LexisNexis 2009.
Jurzyk M., Prawna ochrona tajemnicy spowiedzi w Stanach Zjednoczonych, „Kwartalnik Prawa Publicznego” 2001, No. 1/2.
Krauland E.J. and Cribb T.H., The attorney-client privilege in the United States. An age-old principle under modern pressures, “Symposium Issue of the Professional Lawyer” 2003.
McClellan Marshall J., Ewolucja przywileju poufności adwokat – klient w sądownictwie angloamerykańskim, w: Etyka zawodów prawniczych w praktyce. Relacje na sali rozpraw, ed. G. Borkowski, Lublin 2013.
Stern M.D., Hoffman D., Privileged informers: The attorney subpoena problem and proposal for reform, “University of Pennsylvania Law Review”1988, Vol. 136, Issue 6.
Zacharias F.C., Harmonizing privilege and confidentiality, “Public Law and Legal Theory” 1998, No. 13, San Diego.
Zeidman S., Who Needs an Evidence Code?: The New York Court of Appeals’ Radical Reevaluation of Hearsay, New York 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Paula Maria Białkowska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 420
Number of citations: 0