Chosen Roman and Canon law institutes in Recent Positive Law of the Slovak Republic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2022.003Keywords
protection, Roman Law, Canon Law, canonical equity, status of Women in Roman Law, Senatus Consultum Vellaeanum, usury, Civil Code, bona fidesAbstract
The essence of Senatus Consultum Vellaeanum (hereinafter referred to as the “SCV”) was to forbid intercession of women in case of debt of another person. The art of Roman lawyers to deal with different circumstances of a case can be observed and situations in which protection of a woman is required can be discovered in the individual fragments of the SCV. Canonical equity (aequitas) is a relative idea that calculates with a higher principle of justice or the moderation of law in its application. After analysis of the individual cases, it can be stated that the aim of the SCV was to protect women, who in these cases acted as the weaker party, based on the general experience that in the majority of cases women are emotionally more inclined to help, and act with undue confidence in the ability of the other person to honour his promise; they are unable, especially, to withstand the importunacy of their husbands or friends, and they are generally prone to be influenced by unscrupulous or wellmeant, but unsound advice. Under the influence of emotions and strong life situations, women tend to be naive, very optimistic, and negligent about their own interests. The common purpose of protection – a person emotionally distressed, trustful, negligent about his/her own interests, who has become an entity of a contractual relationship, in which the said person’s rights are grossly disproportionate to the rights arising from the contractual relationship – can be identified even in civil usury, which is part of Slovak positive law. Legal protection against usury is, likewise, an expression of the requirement of justice and good morals in legal relations. Based on the given conclusions, it can be stated that the essence and aim of the SCV and canonical equity has found its representation also in the legal order of the Slovak Republic.
References
Berger A., Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia 1991.
Coughlin J.J., Law, Person, and Community, Philosophical, Theological, and Comparative Perspectives on Canon Law, Oxford 2012.
Čunderlík Čerbová V., Bona fides v zákone č. 99/1963 Zb. Občianskom súdnom poriadku a novom Civilnom sporovom poriadku, in: Soudobé reflexe římského práva: římské právo v moderních kodifikacích, ed. K. Stloukalová, Praha 2015.
Čunderlík Čerbová V., Bona fides ako jeden z princípov rímskeho záväzkového práva. Míľniky práva v stredoeurópskom priestore 2015, Bratislava 2015.
Kincl J., Gaius – Učebnice práva ve čtyrech knihách, Plzeň 2007.
Kincl J., Urfus V., Skrějpek M., Římské právo, 2. vydání, Praha 1995.
Kuttner S., Harmony from Dissonance: An Interpretation of Medieval Canon Law, Latrobe 1960.
Medicus D., Zur Geschichte des Senatus Consultum Velleianum, Köln–Graz 1957.
Mӧnnich U., Frauenschutz vor riskanten Geschäften: Interzessionsverbote nach dem Velleianischen Senatsbeschluss, Köln 1999.
Sommer O., Učebnice soukromého práva římského, díl II. Právo majetkové, Praha 1946.
Vladár V., Graciánov dekrét. Analyticko-prekladová štúdia k 1. dištinkcii, “Iurium scriptum” 2018, No. 2(1).
Vladár V., Prínos kánonického práva k výučbe právnej teórie v histórii a súčasnosti, in: “VŠEHRD – časopis českých právníků”, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.vsehrd.cz/clanek/prinos-kanonickehoprava-k-vyucbe-pravnej-teorie-v-historii-a-sucasnosti_9bb315d6-f872-422f-a8b9-05c21d531562
Vogt H., Miscellanea ad senatusconsultum Velleianum, “Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis/Revue d’Histoire du Droit” 1967, Vol. 35.
Watson A. (ed.), The Digest of Justinian, Vol. 2, Philadelphia 1998.
Winkel L., Forms of Imposed Protection in Legal History, Especially in Roman Law, “Erasmus Law Review” 2010, Iss. 3(2).
Zimmerman R., The Law of Obligation, Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, New York 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Veronika Čunderlík Čerbová
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 357
Number of citations: 0