A Descriptive Study of Cognitive Status Three Years Following Motor Stroke
Keywords
Motor stroke, Brain attack, Cognition, Cognitive statusAbstract
Background. Stroke, or brain attack, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the poststroke period, intact cognition is needed to recognize dangerous situations, for problem solving, and forming new memories. Cognitive status 3 years after one particular type of ischemic stroke, motor stroke, has received minimal attention.
Material and methods. This was a descriptive study of cognitive status of 60 patients 3 years following a motor stroke.
Results. Of the patients available, 11 had died, 30 consented to a home visit and 19 were interviewed by telephone. The mean age of patients at the time of follow-up was 64 years and cognitive status was measured using three instruments. The median Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at baseline was 26.00 (interquartile range, 22.25 to 28.00) and 28.50 (interquartile range, 25.75 to 30.00) at three years. Median scores on Cognistat (The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination) at baseline was 65.00 (interquartile range, 58.00 to 73.75) and 74.00 (interquartile range, 67.50 to 79.50) at three years. The mean cognitive subscore on the Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) at baseline was 33.43 (+ 3.28) and 26.5 (+ 13.25) at three years. There were statistically significant differences between baseline and three years on each of the three cognitive measures.
Conclusions. This study provides a rich description of the cognitive status of a group of individuals 3 years after motor stroke. Although limited by a small sample size neuroscience nurses need to be aware that cognitive status may not decline in this subtype of stroke. (PNN 2012;1(3):97-102)
References
Gillen G. Stroke rehabilitation: A function-based approach. St Louis: Mosby. 2011.
Fisher C.M., Curry H.B. Pure motor hemiplegia of vascular origin. Archives of Neurology. 1965;13:30-44.
Arboix A., Padilla I., Massons J., Garcia-Eroles L., Comes E., Targa C. Clinical study of 222 patients with pure motor stroke. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2001;71(2):239-242.
Melo T.P., Bogousslavsky J., van Melle G., Regli F. Pure motor stroke: a reappraisal. Neurology. 1992;42(4):789-795.
Moncayo J., Devuyst G., Van Melle G., Bogousslavsky J. Coexisting causes of ischemic stroke. Archives of Neurology. 2000;57(8):1139-1144.
United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Post-stroke rehabilitation. 1995; no. 95- 0662:248.
Pasquini M., Leys D., Rousseaux M., Pasquier F., Henon H. Influence of cognitive impairment on the institutionalization rate 3 years after a stroke. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2007;78(1):56-59.
Hinkle J.L. Outcome three years after motor stroke. Rehabilitation Nursing. 2010;35(1):23-30.
Hinkle J.L. Variables explaining functional recovery following motor stroke. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 2006;38(1):6-12.
Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. “Minimental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12(3):189-198.
Tombaugh T.N., McIntyre N.J.. The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 1992;40(9):922-935.
Osmon D.C., Smet I.C., Winegarden B., Gandhavadi B. Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: its use with unilateral stroke patients in a rehabilitation setting. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1992;73(5):414-418.
Cammermeyer M., Evans J.E. A brief neurobehavioral exam useful for early detection of postoperative complications in neurosurgical patients. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 1988;20(5):314-323.
Mueller, J., Kiernan, R., Langston, W. Manual for Cognistat (The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination). The Northern California Neurobehavioral Group Inc. 2001.
Chumney D., Nollinger K., Shesko K., Skop K., Spencer M., Newton R.A.. Ability of Functional Independence Measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population: systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2010;47(1):17-29.
Cavanagh S.J., Hogan K., Gordon V., Fairfax J. Stroke-specific FIM models in an urban population. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 2000;32(1):17-21.
Segal M.E., Gillard M, Schall R. Telephone and inperson proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1996;75(3):208-212.
Patel M., Coshall C., Rudd A.G., Wolfe C.D.. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2003;17(2):158-166.
Appelros P., Andersson A.G.. Changes in Mini Mental State Examination score after stroke: lacunar infarction predicts cognitive decline. European Journal of Neurology. 2006;13(5):491-495.
Pendlebury S.T., Cuthbertson F.C., Welch S.J., Mehta Z., Rothwell P.M. Underestimation of cognitive impairment by Mini-Mental State Examination versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with transient ischemic attack and stroke: a populationbased study. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1290-1293.
Zwecker M., Levenkrohn S., Fleisig Y., Zeilig G., Ohry A., Adunsky A.. Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Lowenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002 Mar;83(3):342-345.
Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1994;57(2):202-207.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 105
Number of citations: 0