The Deconstructive Potential of Collective Biography Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2020.030Keywords
collective biography writing, cultural obviousness, critical thinking, deconstructionAbstract
In this paper, I highlight the deconstructive potential of the collective biography writing (CBW) method, referring both to its selected theoretical assumptions and those elements
of its research procedure which particularly favour sensitivity to dominant, normative discourses. Since the effectiveness of the method is determined by analytical practice, an important
part of the article is devoted to recalling my own experience with its application. The use of “checkpoints” specific to the CBW method in the course of collective analytical work makes the relativity of dominant discourses more visible to the esearch team and thus also more suitable for examination and understanding. Therefore, a further inherent purpose
of the collective writing procedure is to support the development of critical competences in research participants, which results in showing the method presented herein also as a method of learning critical thinking. As a context for investigating the “invisibility” of discourses and the discourse boundaries in which we are enclosed, I choose the phenomenon of cultural obviousness.
References
Baert, P. (2006). Social Theory and the Social Sciences. In: G. Delanty (Ed.), Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory, (pp. 14–24). London: Routledge.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life. The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London, New York: Verso.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2005). Feminist/Poststructuralism. In: C. Lewin & B. Somekh (Ed.), Research Methods in the Social Sciences, (pp. 318–325). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). Doing Collective Biography. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2012). Collective Biography and the Entangled Enlivening of Being. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(4), 357–376; doi: 10.1525/irqr.2012.5.4.357.
Derrida, J. (2007). Pozycje. Rozmowy z Henri Ronsem, Julią Kristevą oraz Jean-Louis Houdebinem i Guy Scarpettą [Positions. Conversations with Henri Rons, Julia Kristeva, Jean-Louis Houdebin, and Guy Scarpetta]. Katowice: Wydawnictwo FA-art.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (2006). Krytyczna analiza dyskursu [Critical Discourse Analysis]. In: A. Jasińska-Kania, L. M. Nijakowski, J. Szacki, & M. Ziółkowki (Eds.), Współczesne teorie socjologiczne [Contemporary Sociological Theories], (pp. 1047–1056). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Gannon, S., Walsh, S., Byers, M., & Rajiva, M. (2014). Deterritorializing Collective Biography. International Journal for Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(2), 181–195, doi: 10.1080/09518398.2012.737044.
Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Kwaśnica, R. (2014). Dyskurs edukacyjny po inwazji rozumu instrumentalnego. O potrzebie refleksyjności [Educational Discourse after the Invasion of Instrumental Reason. On the Expediency of Reflectivity]. Wrocław: Dolnośląska Szkoła Wyższa.
Mulnix, J.W. (2012). Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464–479; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x .
Onyx, J., & Small, J. (2001). Memory-Work: The Method. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 773–786; doi: 10.1177/107780040100700608.
Ostrowicka H. (2014). Kategoria dyskursu w języku i w badaniach edukacyjnych – w poszukiwaniu osobliwości pedagogicznie zorientowanej analizy dyskursu [The Category of Discourse in Language and in Educational Research – in Search of Peculiarities of Pedagogically-Oriented Discourse Analysis]. Forum Oświatowe, 2(52), 47–68.
Ostrowicka, H. (2015). Przemyśle z Michelem Foucaultem edukacyjne dyskursy o młodzieży. Dyspozytyw i urządzanie [Thinking with Michel Foucault on the Educational Discourses on Youth. Dispositif and Governmentality]. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press. Retrieved 10 February 2020 from: http://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf.
Rapley T. (2007). Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC: Sage Publications.
Trahar, S. (2013). Contemporary Methodological Diversity in European Higher Education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 301–309; doi: 10.2304/eerj.2013.12.3.301.
Wihlborg, M. (2013). Using a Process of Collective Biography Writing in Higher Education to Develop an Ability to Explore, Reveal and Critically Reflect. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 376–388; doi: 10.2304/eerj.2013.12.3.376.
Wihlborg, M. (2015). An Awareness of the Feminist Subject: An Example of Collective Biography Writing in Poststructuralist Discourse Practice. In: P. Smeyers, D. Bridges, N.C. Burbules, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research, (pp. 257–280). Dordrecht–Heidelberg–New York–London: Springer.
Wyatt, J., Davies, B., Gale, K., & Gannon, S. (2017). Creating a Space in Between: Collaborative Research Inquiries. In: N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. (pp. 738–756). U.S.: Sage.
Zbróg, Z. (2017a). Zbiorowe pisanie biografii jako metoda uczenia się o sobie, o innych, o świecie [Collective Biography Writing as a Method of Learning about Oneself, the Others and the World]. Studia Edukacyjne, 46, 357–372; doi: 10.14746/se.2017.46.23.
Zbróg, Z. (2017b). Podmiot-w-procesie. Poststrukturalistyczna analiza wspomnień w grupach studenckich metodą zbiorowego pisania biografii [Subject-in-Process. Poststructuralist Analysis of Memories in Groups of Students Using the Collective Biography Writing Method]. Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, 2, 56–72; doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.3281.
Zbróg, Z. (2019). Wiedza pedagogiczna przyszłych nauczycieli w perspektywie teorii reprezentacji społecznych. Ujęcie dynamiczne. [Pedagogical Knowledge of Future Teachers in the Perspective of Social Representations Theory. A Dynamic Approach]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 718
Number of citations: 0
