In Pursuit of Empowering the Culturally Fragile – an Emic Approach and Indigenous Methodology in a European Research Context
Keywordsemic approach, indigenous methodology, qualitative methods, multicultural society, Bosnia-Herzegovina
This article was inspired by my long-standing experience in conducting field research in the culturally diverse environment of Bosnia-Herzegovina. It contributes to the better understanding of emic research, reviewing indigenous strategies and the importance of increasing the researcher’s cultural sensitivity and awareness of the cultural peculiarities they wish to investigate, through the adaptation of qualitative methods. Moreover, the article adds to the ways in which research projects are designed, acknowledging the equal status of the participants (neither the respondents nor “the researched”) who can (and should) be approached ethically and with full recognition of their status as the co-producers of knowledge. Such an outlook towards one’s own project can provide an important input to the emancipation and recognition of culturally fragile groups, such as ethnic or religious minorities, refugees, groups subject to social exclusion, etc. The lessons I have learned in the course of almost 17-years experience of doing field research in a multicultural setting (Bosnia-Herzegovina), also including some failures in this regard, inspired me to propose this paper as a starting point of a broader debate on conducting socially and ethically responsible field research in a multicultural society, or amongst culturally diverse groups.
Atkinson, J. (2002). Trauma Trails, Recreating Song Lines: the Transgenerational Effects of Trauma in Indigenous Australia. Spinifex Press: North Melbourne.
Becker. H. (1967). Whose Side Are We On?. Social Problems, 14/3, pp. 234–247.
Berry, J. (1969). On Cross-cultural Comparability. International Journal of Psychology 4, pp. 119–128.
Berry, J. (1989). Imposed Etics-Emic-Dervied Etics: The Operationalization of a Compelling Idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, pp. 721–735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598908247841.
Bishop, R. (1999). Collaborative Storytelling: Meeting Indigenous People’s Desires for Self-determination. Paper presented at the World Indigenous People’s Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
Boas, F. Stocking, G. (1974). The Shaping of American Anthropology, 1883–1911: a Franz Boas Reader. New York: Basic Books.
Boyd, S. (2005). What Knowledge Do You Privilege? Paper presented at Graduate Student Conference for the University of Victoria. Studies in Policy and Practice, Victoria, 18 Nov.
Bruyere, G. (1999). “Empowerment” in Aboriginal Social Work Training Project – Curriculum. Victoria: Caring for First Nations Children Society.
Chilisa, B. (2011). Indigenous Research Methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.
Christie, M. (2006). Transdisciplinary Research and Aboriginal Knowledge. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education 35, pp.1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004191.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2005) Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In: Denzin N.K., Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1–32). 3rd Edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Enriquez, V. (1994). Pagbabangong-dagal: Indigenous Psychology & Cultural Empowerment. Quezon City: Akademya ng Kultura at Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
Enriquez, V. (2006). Developing a Filipino Psychology, In: U. Kim, & J. W. Berry (eds.), Indigenous Psychology Research and Experience in Cultural Context (pp. 152–169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fine, J. Van Antwerp (2007). The Bosnian Church : Its Place in State and Society from the Thirteenth to the Fifteenth Century : a New Interpretation. London : Saqi in association with the Bosnian Institute.
Foucault, M. (1997). Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin.
Garroutte E.M.(2003). Real Indians: Identity and the Survival of Native America. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Gergen M., Gergen K.J. (2003). Social Construction: A Reader. Sage Publications.
Janke, T. (1999). Our Culture: Our Future. Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights. Surry Hills: Michael Frankel & Company.
Kim, U., Triandis H.C., Kagitcibasi C., Choi S-C, & Yoon G. (eds.) (1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kurtz, D. (2013). Indigenous Methodologies: Traversing Indigenous and Western Worldviews in Research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 9(3), pp. 217–229, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011300900303.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting Smart, Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
Liamputtong P. (2007). Researching the Vulnerable. A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Martin, D. (2012). Two-eyed Seeing: a Framework for Understanding Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Approaches to Indigenous Health Research. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 44, pp. 20–42.
Martin, K., Mirraboopa B. (2003). Ways of Knowing, Ways of Being and Ways of Doing: a Theoretical Framework and Methods for Indigenous Research and Indigenist Research. Journal of Australian Studies 76, pp. 203–214, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838.
Pe-Pua, R. (2006). From Decolonizing Psychology to the Development of a Cross-Indigenous Perspective in Methodology. In: U. Kim, K-S Yang, & H. Kwang-Kuo (eds.), Indigenous and Cultural Psychology. International and Cultural Psychology (pp.109–137). New York: Springer.
Pike, K. L. (1954). Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. Dallas, TX, US: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Pilarska, J. (2015). Interpersonal Skills in Dealing with Multiculturalism : Bosnian Borderland case. EUSER : European Center for Science Education and Research, ICSS Vol. 4, pp. 671–680.
Rigney, D. (2001). The Metaphorical Society: An Invitation to Social Theory. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Rigney, L. (1997). Racism and Physical Education: A Critical Indigenist Analysis of the Senate Standing Committee’s Report on Physical and Sport Education. Masters of Education Thesis. Adelaide: University of South Australia.
Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through Cultures – Expeditions in Cultural Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
Smith, L. (2004). Researching in the Margins: Issues for Mäori Researchers. Paper prepared for the research project, Protocols for Research with Vulnerable and Marginalised Mäori.
Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies. London&New York: Zed books.
Stewart-Harawira, M. (2005). Cultural Studies, Indigenous Knowledge and Pedagogies of Hope. Policy Futures in Education, 3(2), pp. 153–163, DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2005.3.2.4.
Stocking. G. 1974 (ed.). The Shaping of American Anthropology, 1883–1911: a Franz Boas Reader. New York: Basic Books.
Wallner, F. G. (1997). How to Deal with Science if You Care for Other Cultures. Wien: Braumüller.
Weber-Pillwax, C. (2001). Orality in Northern Cree Indigenous Worlds. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), pp. 149–165.
How to Cite
Number of views and downloads: 1
Number of citations: 0