Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review)

The Quality of Late Adolescents’ Online Dating Relationships: A Peri-Pandemic Perspective
  • Home
  • /
  • The Quality of Late Adolescents’ Online Dating Relationships: A Peri-Pandemic Perspective
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 2 No. 47 (2024): Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych /
  4. Original research projects

The Quality of Late Adolescents’ Online Dating Relationships: A Peri-Pandemic Perspective

Authors

  • Sławomir Pasikowski University of Lodz, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-1596
  • Luana Bruno Department of Educational Sciences, Area of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Alcalá, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-7228
  • Maria Beatrice Ligorio Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3028-5046
  • Alejandro Iborra Cuéllar Department of Educational Sciences, Area of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Alcalá, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-8622
  • Susanna Annese Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-9118
  • Oliver Holz Leuven Economics of Education Research, KU Leuven, Belgium https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-3923

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2024.016

Abstract

The study delves into late adolescents’ relationships peri-pandemic, examining online communication’s impact. It explores relationships’ structure, tying the quality of dating relationships to sociodemographic traits and relationship ambivalence. These facets, previously discussed individually in the literature, are consolidated into a unique model for the first time consisted of 16 independent and 10 dependent variables. The study expected a complex interplay involving gender, education, religious commitment, and cultural influences across the chosen Central and Southern European countries as Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, and Spain. A sample of 691 European late adolescents, both female (55%) and male, with an average age of 22 and who were currently or previously engaged in close relationships, was analysed. Canonical analysis was used as a main method of data process. Findings highlight the role of partnership, relationship satisfaction, ambivalence, gender, and nationality in determining the quality of online dating, love dynamics, and partner identification.

References

Allen, J.P., Moore, C., Kuperminc, G., & Bell, K. (1998). Attachment and Adolescent Psychosocial Functioning. Child Development, 69(5), 1406–1419, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06220.x.

Allen, J.P., Costello, M.A., Hellwig, A.F., Pettit, C., Stern, J.A., & Uchino, B.N. (2023). Adolescent Caregiving Success as a Predictor of Social Functioning from Ages 13 to 33. Child Development, 94, 1610–1624, doi: 10.1111/cdev.13936.

Alzueta, E., Perrin, P., Baker, F.C., Caffarra, S., Ramos-Usuga, D., Yuksel, D., & Arango-Lasprilla, J.C. (2021). How the COVID-19 Pandemic Has Changed Our Lives: A Study of Psychological Correlates Across 59 Countries. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 556–570.

Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.

Arnett, J.J. (2004). Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from Late Teens Through the Twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.

Arnett, J.J. (2011). Debating Emerging Adulthood: Stage or Process? New York: Oxford University Press.

Arnett, J.J. (2012). New Horizons in Research on Emerging and Young Adulthood. In: J.J. Arnett (Ed.), Early Adulthood in a Family Context (pp. 231–244), doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1436-0_15.

Aron, A., & Fraley, B. (1999). Relationship Closeness as Including Other in the Self: Cognitive Underpinnings and Measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140–160.

Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.

Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.

Beam, E.A. (2023). Social Media as a Recruitment and Data Collection Tool: Experimental Evidence on the Relative Effectiveness of Web Surveys and Chatbots. Journal of Development Economics, 162(C), doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103069.

Bonilla-Zorita, G., Griffiths, M.D., & Kuss, D.J. (2021). Online Dating and Problematic Use: A

Systematic Review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 2245–2278, doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00318-9.

Brooks, S.K., Webster, R.K., Smith, L.E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. (2020). The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence. The Lancet, 395, 912–920, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8.

Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1987). The Development of Companionship and Intimacy. Child Development, 58(4), 1101–1113, doi: 10.2307/1130550.

Buhler, J. L., Krauss, S., & Orth, U. (2021). Development of Relationship Satisfaction Across the Life Span: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 1012–1053, doi: 10.1037/bul0000342.

Calbi, M., Langiulli, N., Ferroni, F., Montalti, M., Kolesnikov, A., Gallese, V., & Umilta, M.A. (2021). The Consequences of COVID-19 on Social Interactions: An Online Study on Face Covering. Scientific Reports, 11(1), doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81780-w.

Caprara, G.V., Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S.H., Schoen, H., Bain, P.G., Silvester, J., Cieciuch, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Bianchi, G., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Katayama, M., Posnova, T., Tabernero, C., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., Lonnqvist, J.-E., …, & Caprara, M.G. (2018). The Contribution of Religiosity to Ideology: Empirical Evidences from Five Continents. Cross-Cultural Research, 52(5), 524–541, doi: 10.1177/1069397118774233.

Caridade, S., Braga, T., & Borrajo, E. (2019). Cyber Dating Abuse (CDA): Evidence from a Systematic Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 152–168, doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.018.

Coleman, L., Mitcheson, J., & Lloyd, G. (2013). Couple Relationships: Why Are They Important for Health and Wellbeing? Journal of Health Visiting, 1(3), 168–172., doi: 10.12968/johv.2013.1.3.97597.

Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2009). Adolescents’ Explanations for Romantic Dissolutions: A Developmental Perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 1209–1223, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.01.006.

Dion, K.K., & Dion, K.L. (1996). Cultural Perspectives on Romantic Love. Personal Relationships, 3(1), 5–17, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00101.x.

Dugal, C., Bakhos, G., Belanger, C., & Godbout, N. (2018). Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy for Couples: An Insight Into the Treatment of Couple Hardships and Struggles. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Clinical Applications, 3(2), 125–135.

Dutton, W.H., & Reisdorf, B.C. (2017). Cultural Divides and Digital Inequalities: Attitudes Shaping Internet and Social Media Divides. Information, Communication & Society, 1–21, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353640.

Ellis, B.J. (2004). Timing of Pubertal Maturation in Girls: An Integrated Life History Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 920–958, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.920.

Elphinston, R.A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to Face It! Facebook Intrusion and the Implications for Romantic Jealousy and Relationship Satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11), 631–635.

Emond, M., Vaillancourt-Morel, M.P., Metellus, S., Brassard, A., & Daspe, M.E. (2023). Social Media Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence in Young Adults’ Romantic Relationships: A Longitudinal Study. Telematics and Informatics, 79, 101956.23.

Fernandez, R.S., Crivelli, L., Guimet, N.M., Allegri, R.F., & Pedreira, M.E. (2020). Psychological Distress Associated with Covid-19 Quarantine: Latent Profile Analysis, Outcome Prediction and Mediation Analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 75–84, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.133.

Fincham, F.D., & Rogge, R. (2010). Understanding Relationship Quality: Theoretical Challenges and New Tools for Assessment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 227–242, doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00059.x.

Genc, E., Tanhan, A., & Kose, O. (2022). Exploring the Facilitators and Barriers to Maintaining Intimate Relationships During COVID-19 Through Online Photovoice Methodology. Journal of Family Issues, 44(11), 2870–2889, doi: 10.1177/0192513X221113855.

Giordano, P.C., Longmore, M.A., & Manning, W.D. (2006). Gender and the Meanings of Adolescent Romantic Relationships: A Focus on Boys. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 260–287, doi: 10.1177/000312240607100205.

Guerrini Degl’Innocenti, T. (2023). Jealousy and Control in Italian Young Adult Relationships: Cultural Reflections. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(3), 257–272, doi: 10.1080/17405629.2023.1934512.

Harper, C.A., Satchell, L.P., Fido, D., & Latzman, R.D. (2020). Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–14, doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5.

Harreveld, F. van, Nohlen, H.U., & Schneider, I.K. (2015). The ABC of Ambivalence: Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Consequences of Attitudinal Conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 285–324, doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002.

Hertlein, K.M., & Blumer, M.L.C. (2014). The Couple and Family Technology Framework: Intimate Relationships in a Digital Age. New York and London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Hohmann, M., Moller, S., & Schmidt, D. (2022). Educational Alignment in Romantic Relationships: Longitudinal Effects on Stability and Satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 85(3), 222–240, doi: 10.1177/01902725221101365.

Holt-Lunstad, J., & Uchino, B.N. (2019). Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD): A Theoretical Model Aimed at Understanding the Health Implications of Ambivalent Relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 941–966, doi: 10.1177/1745691619861392.

Hsieh, N., & Hawkley, L. (2018). Loneliness in the Older Adult Marriage: Associations with Dyadic Aversion, Indifference, and Ambivalence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(10), 1319–1339, doi: 10.1177/0265407517712480.

Joshi, A., Virk, A., Saiyad, S., Mahajan, R., & Singh, T. (2020). Online Assessment: Concept and Applications. Journal of Research in Medical Education & Ethics, 10(2), 49, doi: 10.5958/2231-6728.2020.00015.3.

Kansky, J., & Allen, J.P. (2018). Long-Term Risks and Possible Benefits Associated with Late Adolescent Romantic Relationship Quality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1531–1544.

Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., & Wilson, S.J. (2017). Lovesick: How Couples’ Relationships Influence Health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13(1), 421–443, doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111.

Kewalramani, S., & Hazra, S. (2018). Social Networking and Romantic Relationship in Young Adults. IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, 6(3), 349–354.

Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied Linear Regression Models. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Laessig, R.D., & Duckett, E.J. (1979). Canonical Correlation Analysis: Potential for Environmental Health Planning. American Journal of Public Health, 69(4), 353–360.

Lakatos, C., & Martos, T. (2019). The Role of Religiosity in Intimate Relationships. European Journal of Mental Health, 14, 260–279, doi: 10.5708/EJMH.14.2019.2.3.

Langlais, M., & Schwanz, S. (2017). Religiosity and Relationship Quality of Dating Relationships: Examining Relationship Religiosity as a Mediator. Religions, 8(9), 187, doi: 10.3390/rel8090187.

Lee, Y.A., Lay, J.C., Pauly, T., Graf, P., & Hoppmann, C.A. (2022). The Differential Roles of Chronic and Transient Loneliness in Daily Prosocial Behavior. Psychology and Aging, 37(5), 614–625, doi: 10.1037/pag0000681.

Lempers, J.D., & Clark-Lempers, D.S. (1993). A Functional Comparison of Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Friendships During Adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8(1), 89–108, doi: 10.1177/07435548938100.

Longest, K., & Kang, J.-A. (2022). Social Media, Social Support, and Mental Health of Young Adults During COVID-19. Frontiers in Communication, 7, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.828135.

Lopez-Rodriguez, L., & Gutierrez, M.T. (2023). Educational Homogamy and Relationship Satisfaction: Insights from Spain. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85(5), 1104–1123, doi: 10.1111/jomf.12896.

Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430, doi: 10.1177/1745691610375557.

Meier, A., & Alle, G. (2009). Romantic Relationships from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Sociological Quarterly, 50(2), 308–335, doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01142.x.

Mihalceaa, A., Iliescub, D., & Dinc, M. (2013). The Influence of the Educational Level on Couple Relationships. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 41–45, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.247.

Miller, P.J., Niehuis, S., & Huston, T.L. (2006). Positive Illusions in Marital Relationships: A 13-Year Longitudinal Study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1579–1594, doi: 10.1177/0146167206292691.

Morondo Taramundi, D. (2022). Country Report – Gender Equality – Spain – 2022. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Moss, S.A., & Wilson, S.G. (2015). The Positive Emotions That Facilitate the Fulfilment of Needs May Not Be Positive Emotions at All: The Role of Ambivalence. Explore, 11(1), 40–50, doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2014.10.006.

Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More Information Than You Ever Wanted: Does Facebook Bring Out the Green-Eyed Monster of Jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 441–444, doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0263.

Naszodi, A., & Mendonca, F. (2022). Changing Educational Homogamy: Shifting Preferences or Evolving Educational Distribution? Journal of Demographic Economics, 90(2), 1–29, doi: 10.1017/dem.2022.21.

Neustaedter, C., & Greenberg, S. (2012). Intimacy in Long-Distance Relationships Over Video Chat. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi: 10.1145/2207676.2207785.

Papp, L.M., Danielewicz, J., & Cayemberg, C. (2012). ‘Are we Facebook Official?’ Implications of Dating Partners’ Facebook Use and Profiles for Intimate Relationship Satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 85–90, doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0291.

Pasikowski, S. (2019). Pomiar pośredni cech modelowanych w strukturze opozycji. Formuły integracji danych [Indirect Measurement of the Quantities Modelled in the Opposition Structure. Data Integration Formulas]. Manual of the Research Tools Workshop of the Committee of Pedagogical Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Educational Research Review 28a. Warszawa–Toruń: Wyd. UMK.

Pietromonaco, P.R., & Overall, N.C. (2021). Applying Relationship Science to Evaluate How the COVID-19 Pandemic May Impact Couples’ Relationships. American Psychologist, 76(3), 438–450, doi: 10.1037/amp0000714.

Quintard, V., Jouffe, S., Hommel, B., & Bouquet, C. (2021). Embodied Self-Other Overlap in Romantic Love: A Review and Integrative Perspective. Psychological Research, 85, 899–914, doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01301-8.

Rauer, A.J., Pettit, G.S., Lansford, J.E., Bates, J.E., & Dodge, K.A. (2013). Romantic Relationship Patterns in Young Adulthood and Their Developmental Antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2159–2171, doi: 10.1037/a0031845.

Renga, S. (2021). Country Report – Gender Equality – Italy – 2021. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Rogers, A.A., Ha, T., & Ockey, S. (2021). Adolescents’ Perceived Socio-Emotional Impact of COVID-19 and Implications for Mental Health: Results from a U.S.-Based Mixed-Methods Study. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 68(1), 43–52, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.039.

Sanchez, V., Munoz, N., Nocentini, A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Menesini, E. (2014). Online Intrusiveness, Online Jealousy and Dating Aggression in Young Adults: A Crossnational Study (Spain–Italy). Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 3, 47–65.

Sanchez, V., Munoz-Fernandez, N., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2015). ‘Cyberdating Q_ A’: An Instrument to Assess the Quality of Adolescent Dating Relationships in Social Networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 78–86.

Sawyer, S.M., Azzopardi, P.S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G.C. (2018). The Age of Adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223–228, doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1.

Schubert, T.W., & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of Self, Ingroup, and Outgroup: Pictorial Measures of Self-Categorization. Self and Identity, 1(4), 353–376.

Schulenberg, J.E., Bryant, A.L., & O’Malley, P.M. (2004). Taking Hold of Some Kind of Life: How Developmental Tasks Relate to Trajectories of Well-Being During the Transition to Adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 16(4), 1119–1140.

Scott, V.M., Mottarella, K.E., & Lavooy, M.J. (2006). Does Virtual Intimacy Exist? A Brief Exploration Into Reported Levels of Intimacy in Online Relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 759–761.

Sepulveda, R., Crespo, M., & Vieira, J. (2021). Online ating em tempos de COVID-19: praticas de uso e dinamicas comunicacionais em transformacao forcada [Online Dating in Times of COVID-19: Usage Practices and Communication Dynamics in Forced Transformation]. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, (Special Issue), 76–95, doi: 10.15847/obsOBS0020211923.

Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The Challenge of Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 27–39, doi: 10.1177/2167696812467330.

Shulman, S., & Kipnis, O. (2001). Adolescent Romantic Relationships: A Look from the Future. Journal of Adolescence, 24(3), 337–351, doi: 10.1006/jado.2001.0409.

Silveira, P., Morais, R., & Petrella, S.A. (2022) Communication Study of Young Adults and Online Dependency During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Societies, 12, 109, doi: 10.3390/soc12040109.

Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Karwowski, M., …, & Sternberg, R. (2021). Universality of the Triangular Theory of Love: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Triangular Love Scale in 25 Countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(1), 106–115, doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318.

Sternberg, R.J. (1986). A Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119. Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Construct Validation of a Triangular Love Scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 313–335.

Ta, V.P. (2017). A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender-Role Dimensions and Relationship Satisfaction. Journal of Relationships Research, 8, e18, 1–14, doi: 10.1017/jrr.2017.18.

Violant-Holz, V., Gallego-Jimenez, M.G., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, C.S., Munoz-Violant, S., Rodriguez, M.J., Sansano-Nadal, O., & Guerra-Balic, M. (2020). Psychological Health and Physical Activity Levels During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9419, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249419.

Weinstein, N., Rodriguez, L.M., Knee, C.R., & Kumashiro, M. (2016). Self-Determined Self-Other Overlap: Interacting Effects on Partners’ Perceptions of Support and Well-Being in Close Relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 130–139, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.011.

Yamuna, G., Aswathy Venu, K.V., & Sannet, T. (2021). Internet Addiction Among Young Adults Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 7(4), 17–20, doi: 10.36713/epra6557.

Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C.W. (2021). Individual Differences and Changes in Subjective Wellbeing During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(1), 50–62, doi: 10.1037/amp0000702.

Zayas, V., & Shoda, Y. (2015). Love You? Hate You? Maybe It’s Both: Evidence That Significant Others Trigger Bivalent-Priming. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(1), 56–64, doi: 10.1177/1948550614541297.

Zindel, Z. (2023). Social Media Recruitment in Online Survey Research: A Systematic Literature Review. Methods, data, analyses, 17(2), 207–248, doi: 10.12758/mda.2022.15.

Zoppolat, G., Faure, R., Alonso-Ferres, M., & Righetti, F. (2022). Mixed and Conflicted: The Role of Ambivalence in Romantic Relationships in Light of Attractive Alternatives. Emotion, 22(1), 81–99, doi: 10.1037/emo0001055.

Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review)

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2025-05-19

How to Cite

1.
PASIKOWSKI, Sławomir, BRUNO, Luana, LIGORIO, Maria Beatrice, IBORRA CUÉLLAR, Alejandro, ANNESE , Susanna and HOLZ, Oliver. The Quality of Late Adolescents’ Online Dating Relationships: A Peri-Pandemic Perspective. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review). Online. 19 May 2025. Vol. 2, no. 47, pp. 49-81. [Accessed 28 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/PBE.2024.016.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 47 (2024): Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych

Section

Original research projects

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Sławomir Pasikowski, Luana Bruno, Maria Beatrice Ligorio, Alejandro Iborra Cuéllar, Susanna Annese , Oliver Holz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 184
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop