The Implementation of Reflexive Methodology and a Storyline in Dual-Language Field Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2022.012Keywords
reflexive methodology, classical grounded theory, dual-language, field research, a storylineAbstract
This article attempts to illustrate the process of incorporating a model of reflexivity into dual- language field research as an alternative method of scientific enquiry. It also contributes to the ongoing discussion regarding how to approach reflexivity in a methodologically consistent
manner. The study is rooted in classical grounded theory and therefore it did not attempt to test or expand upon any existing or preconceived theory. However, it began with a research question on how mainstream curricula address the nature of minority cultural diversity. The research was conducted in primary schools in Texas in the United States, where dual-language curricula incorporate cultural aspects of students’ backgrounds. An overt non-participant
observation research technique was applied. The researcher was observing in an unobtrusive manner and making notes within the study environment. The codes and concepts emerging from the data were “put into dialogue” with the researcher’s voice, existing concepts and knowledge. The dialogue took place before, during, and after data collection as part of a literature review, and later to discuss the concepts and categories that emerged from the data. A storyline is used here to present the findings and emerging theories. This study demonstrates that the use of the model of reflexivity in GT research strengthens the rigor of the research process and the development of the researcher.
References
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberd, K. (2000). Reflexive Methodology. New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodology. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Archer, M. (2012). The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Attia, M., & Edge, J. (2017). Be(com)ing a Reflexive Researcher: A Developmental Approach to Research Methodology. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 33–45.
Babino, A., Stewart, M.A. (2018). Remodeling Dual Language Programs: Teachers Enact Agency as Critically Conscious Language Policy Makers. Bilingual Research Journal, 41(3), 272–297, doi: 10.1080/15235882.2018.1489313.
Babino, A., & Stewart, M.A. (2020). Radicalizing Literacies and Languaging. A Framework Toward Dismantling the Mono-Mainstream Assumption. Palgrave Macmillan.
Birks, M., Mills, J.E., Francis, K., & Chapman, Y. (2009). A Thousand Words Paint a Picture: The Use of Storyline in Grounded Theory Research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14, 405–417, doi:10.1177/1744987109104675.
Bolton, G. (2014). Reflexive Practice: Writing and Professional Development. 4th ed. London: Sage Publishing.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074–1084, doi: 10.1177/ 1077800414545235.
Chesney, M. (2001). Dilemmas of Self in the Method. Qualitative Health Research, 11(1), 127–135.
Corbin, J., & Holt, N.L. (2011). Grounded Theory. In: B. Somekh, & C. Lewin (Eds.), Theory and Methods in Social Research (pp. 113–120). 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Corbin, J.M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
Cutcliffe, J.R. (2003). Reconsidering Reflexivity: Introducing the Case for Intellectual Entrepreneurship. Qualitative Health Research, 13(1), 136–148. doi:10.1177/1049732302239416.
Engward, H., & Davis, G. (2015). Being Reflexive in Qualitative Grounded Theory: Discussion and Application of a Model of Reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71, doi:10.1111/jan.12653.
Evans L.E. (2013). A Novice Researcher’s First Walk Through the Maze of Grounded Theory: Rationalization for Classical Grounded Theory. Ground Theory Review: An International Journal, 14, 37–55.
Fairclough, N. (1999). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 4th ed. London–New York: Longman.
Feucht, F., Brownlee, J., & Schraw, G. (2017). Moving Beyond Reflection: Reflexivity and Epistemic Cognition in Teaching and Teacher Education. Educational Psychologist, 52, 234–241, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1350180.
Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.
Gentles, S.J., Jack, S.M., Nicholas, D.B., & McKibbon, K.A. (2014). Critical Approach to Reflexivity in Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report, 19(44), 1–14, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1109.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Gomez & Gomez (accessed December 2021). Why Choose the Gomez and Gomez Model? Gomez and Gomez Dual Language Consultants. Retrieved 20 December 2021 from: http://www.gomezandgomez.com/why-dual-language-.html.
Gomez R. (2006). Promising Practices: Dual Language Enrichment For ELL Students K-12. TABE Journal, 9(1).
Gomez, L., Freeman, D., & Freeman, Y. (2005). Dual Language Education: A Promising 50–50 Model. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(1), 145–164, doi: 10.1080/ 15235882.2005.10162828.
Hall, W.A., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the Rigor of Grounded Theory: Incorporating Reflexivity and Relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257–272.
Hertz, R. (1996). Introduction: Ethics, Reflexivity and Voice. Qualitative Sociology, 19, 3–9, doi: 10.1007/BF02393245.
Jeong-Hee, K. (2016). Understanding Narrative Inquiry. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Jones, S.R. (2002). (Re)writing the Word: Methodological Strategies and Issues in Qualitative Research. Journal of College Student Development, 43(4), 461–473.
Koch, T., & Harrington, A. (1998). Reconceptualizing Rigour: The Case for Reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(4), 882–890, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00725.x
Lincoln, Y.S., & Denzin, N.K. (1994). The Fifth Moment. In: N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 575–586). London, UK: Sage.
Liu, F., & Maitlis, S. (2013). Emotional Dynamics and Strategizing Processes: A Study of Strategic Conversations in Top Team Meetings. Journal of Management Studies, 51, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01087.x.
Lozada, V., Rios-Jimenez, E., Hansen-Thomas, H., Grosso Richins, L., & South, S. (2021). Una Noche de Musica: Sustaining Our Students’ Culture. General Music Today, 1–7, doi: 10.1177/10483713211032311.
Mauthner, N.S., & Doucet A. (2003). Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431, doi: 10.1177%2F00380385030373002.
Menken, K. (2013). Emergent Bilingual Students in Secondary School: Along the Academic Language and Literacy Continuum. Language Teaching, 46(4), 438–476, doi: 10.1017/S0261444813000281.
Mitchell, R.G., & Charmaz, K. (1996). Telling Tales, Writing Stories. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 25, 144–166.
Montalvo, R., Combes, B.H., & Kea, C.D. (2014). Perspectives on Culturally and Linguistically Responsive RtI Pedagogics Through a Cultural and Linguistic Lens. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching & Learning, 4(3), 203–219.
Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2007). Grounded Theory and Reflexivity. In: A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 515–538). London, UK: Sage.
Myers, A., & Hightower, J. (2019). Bringing Together a Harmony of Voices. Using the Inside-Out Strategy as a Culturally Responsive Approach to Intertwine Knowledge from Self, Peer, and Text. A Journal of the Texas Council of Teachers of English Language Arts, 49(1).
Neill, S.J. (2006). Grounded Theory Sampling: The Contribution of Reflexivity. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 253–260, doi: 10.1177/1744987106051850.
Ng-A-Fook, N., & Rottman, J. (2012). Reconsidering Canadian Curriculum Studies: Provoking Historical, Present, and Future Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Mc-Millan.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196, doi: 10.1080/0951839032000060635.
Primeau, L.L. (2003). Reflections on Self in Qualitative Research: Stories of Family. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 57, 9–16.
Richardson, L. (1992). Trash on the Corner: Ethics and Technography. Contemporary Ethnography, 21, 103–119.
Roberts, K.L., & Taylor, B.J. (2002). Nursing Research Processes: An Australian Perspective. South Melbourne: Nelson.
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in Language Planning. Journal of the National Association of Bilingual Education, 8, 15–34.
Sandelowski, M. (1998). Writing a Good Read: Strategies for Re-Presenting Qualitative Data. Research in Nursing & Health, 21, 375–382.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Timonen, V., Foley, G., & Conlon, C. (2018). Challenges When Using Grounded Theory: A Pragmatic Introduction to Doing GT Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, doi: 10.1177/1609406918758086.
Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421, doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Barbara Muszyńska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 464
Number of citations: 0