The use of surveys and interviews in the field library and information science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/FT.2018.008

Keywords

methodology, research methods, survey, individual interview, group interview

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the article is to look at a selected fragment of the extensive subject matter of the methodology of book and information science – surveys along with individual and group interviews. The article discusses the specific nature of individual tools, and analyzes their use in the discipline in terms of quantity, evaluating their contribution to scientific and qualitative texts. Research method: Considerations were based on a review of literature and own bibliometric studies, including the study of the content of two leading Polish scientific journals (Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej and Przegląd Biblioteczny) for the years 2010-2015. Results and conclusions: As a result of the conducted analyses, it has not been noticed that these tools are widely used by Polish researchers in the field of information processing, although we are dealing with more frequent use of surveys than interviews.

Author Biography

Justyna Jasiewicz, University of Warsaw. The Faculty of Journalism, Information and Book Studies

Justyna Jasiewicz, PhD, assistant professor at the Faculty of Journalism, Information and Bibliology at the University of Warsaw. She deals with issues of information competence and digital competence. Since 2016 she has been running a project on the use of research methods in social sciences in the field of book and information science. She is a member of the research team of the Center for Media Analysis at the University of Warsaw, where she coordinates the research on digital competences of young people, conducted with the use of biometric measurements. She is the author of the following publications: Kompetencje informacyjne młodzieży (Warszawa 2012), and numerous scientific and popular science articles published in collective works, Przegląd Biblioteczny, Information-Wissenschaft und Praxis, Gazeta Wyborcza; she is the co-author of the work Informacja zdrowotne. Oczekiwania i kompetencje polskich użytkowników (Warszawa 2013). A member of numerous research teams, an expert in a number of non-governmental organizations, including the Orange Foundation and the Modern Poland Foundation; in the years 2014-2016 she was the head of research at the Digital Center Project: Poland.

References

Babbie, Earl. 2008. The Basics of Social Research. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Chu, Heting, and Qing Ke. 2017. „Research Methods: What’s in the Name?“ Library and Information Science Research, 39: 284–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.001.

Chu, Heting. 2015. „Research Methods in Library and Information Science: A Content Analysis,” Library and Information Science Research 37: 36–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.003.

Cibangu, Sylvain K. 2013. „A Memo of Qualitative Research for Information Science: Toward Theory Construction.“ Journal of Documentation 69: 194–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411311300048.

Cisek, Sabina. 2002. Filozoficzne aspekty informacji naukowej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Cisek, Sabina. 2013. „Metodologia jakościowa we współczesnej informatologii. Wybrane aspekty.” Przegląd Biblioteczny 81: 299–309.

Dembowska, Maria. 1999. „Informacja Naukowa Jako Dyscyplina Naukowa.” W Bibliologia, Bibliografia, Bibliotekoznawstwo, Informacja naukowa. Wybór prac., ed. by M. Dembowska, 164–178. Warszawa: Biblioteka PAN.

Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln, ed. 2014. Metody badań jakościowych. 1. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Freitas, Juliana Lazzarotto, Leilah Santiago Bufrem, and Sônia Maria Breda. 2016. „Methodological Choices for Research in Information Science: Contributions to Domain Analysis.” Transinformacao 28: 5–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/231808892016002800001.

Greifeneder, Elke. 2014. „Trends in Information Behaviour Research.” W Proceedings of ISIC, the Information Behaviour Conference, Leeds, 2–5 September, 2014: Part 1 13. http://informationr.net/ir/19-4/isic/isic13.html.

Hider, Philip, and Bob Pymm. 2008. „Empirical Research Methods Reported in High-Profile LIS Journal Literature.“ Library and Information Science Research 30: 108–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007.

Jemielniak, Dariusz, red. 2012. Badania jakościowe. Metody i narzędzia. 2. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Migoń, Krzysztof. 2007. „Bibliologia wśród innych nauk. Koncepcje, realizacje, perspektywy.” W Bibliologia: Problemy badawcze nauk humanistycznych, ed. By D. Kuźmina, 13–24. Warszawa: Wydaw. SBP.

Pickard, Alison Jane. 2007. Research Methods in Information. London: Facet.

Powell, Ronald R. 1999. „Recent Trends in Research: A Methodological Essay.” Library & Information Science Research 21: 91–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)80007-3.

Stefaniak, Barbara, Marta Skalska-Zlat, and Sabina Cisek. 2016. ”Metody badań w nauce o informacji.” W Nauka o informacji, ed. by W. Babik, 89–122. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SBP.

Zhang, Yan, and Barbara M. Wildemuth. 2009. „Unstructured Interviews.“ W Application of Social Science Research Methods to Question in Information and Library Science, 222–231. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

Folia Toruniensia

Downloads

Published

2018-08-01

How to Cite

Jasiewicz, J. (2018). The use of surveys and interviews in the field library and information science. Folia Toruniensia, 18, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.12775/FT.2018.008

Issue

Vol. 18 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

Authors sign the license agreement, where authors have copyright but license exclusive rights in their article to the publisher. In this case authors have a range of rights, including:

  • The right to share or reuse their article in the same ways permitted to third parties under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Following it, the author can "copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms."
  • Authors retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
  • Authors receive proper attribution and credit for the published work.
 

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 438
Number of citations: 0