Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Français (Canada)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • Editorial Team
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Review process
    • List of Reviewers
    • Scientific Council
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Abstracting and Indexing Services
    • Privacy Statement
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving policy
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Français (Canada)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia

The wayehî ʾîš [ʾeḥād] formula as the narrative framework of the Deuteronomistic account of the decline of the pre-monarchic period in Israel (Judg 13:2–1 Sam 10:16)
  • Home
  • /
  • The wayehî ʾîš [ʾeḥād] formula as the narrative framework of the Deuteronomistic account of the decline of the pre-monarchic period in Israel (Judg 13:2–1 Sam 10:16)
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016): The Bible and History /
  4. Articles

The wayehî ʾîš [ʾeḥād] formula as the narrative framework of the Deuteronomistic account of the decline of the pre-monarchic period in Israel (Judg 13:2–1 Sam 10:16)

Authors

  • Dariusz Dziadosz Instytut Nauk Biblijnych Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II w Lublinie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-0560

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/BPTh.2026.009

Keywords

formula wayehî ʾîš [ʾeḥād], Deuteronomistic redaction, the tradition block Judges 13:2–1 Samuel 10:16, Samson, Micah, Eli, Samuel, Saul

Abstract

One of the most groundbreaking moments in the Deuteronomistic historiography of Israel (Josh–2 Kgs) was the socio-religious transformation that occurred at the end of the period of the Judges, leading to a transition from the rule of local tribal leaders and the unstructured ministry of priestly levites to a model of enduring and widely recognized institutions: the prophet and the king. To this significant process of transformation, the Deuteronomists devoted a specially delineated and edited collection of traditions comprising several larger cycles of narratives, which are now found at the end of the Book of Judges (13–16; 17–18; 19–21) and the beginning of 1 Samuel (1–3; 9:1–10:16). The structural and narrative coherence of this block of texts is determined by the fivefold use of the formula wayehî ʾîš [ʾeḥād], and this publication presents its origin, distribution, literary characteristics, and functions within the complex spanning Judges 13:2–1 Samuel 10:16.

References

Ackerman Susan. 1998. Warrior, Dancer, Seductress, Queen. Women in Judges and Biblical Israel (The Anchor Bible Reference Library). New York: Doubleday.

Amit, Yairah. 1999. The Book of Judges. The Art of Editing (Biblical Interpretation Series 38). Leiden: Brill.

Amit, Yairah. 2012. “The Nazirism Motif and the Editorial Work”. In: In Praise of Editing the Hebrew Bible. Collected Essays in Retrospect, ed. Y. Amit (Hebrew Bible Monographs 39), 131–146. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.

Auld, A. Graeme. 2011. I and II Samuel: A Commentary (The Old Testament Library). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

Bader, Winfried. 1991. Simson bei Delila. Computerlinguistische Interpretation des Textes Ri 13˗16 (Textwissenschaft, Theologie, Hermeneutik, Linguistik, Literaturanalyse, Informatik 3A). Tübingen: Francke.

Bartusch, Mark W. 2003. Understanding Dan: An Exegetical Study of a Biblical City, Tribe and Ancestor (Journal for the Study of the Old Testament. Supplements 379). Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Beldman, David. J. 2017. The Completion of Judges: Strategies of Ending in Judges 17–21. Siphrut 21. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.

Block, Daniel I. 1999. Judges. Ruth (The New American Commentary 6). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

Driver, Samuel R. 1913. Notes on the Hebrew Text of the Books of Samuel. With an Introduction on Hebrew Palaeography and the Ancient Versions, and Facsimiles of Inscriptions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Exum, J. Cheryl. 1983. “The Theological Dimension of the Samson Saga”, Vetus Testamentum 33: 30–45.

Gross, Walter. 1981. “Syntaktische Erscheinungen am Anfang althebräischer Erzählungen: Hintergrund und Vordergrund”. In: Congress Volume: Vienna, 1980, ed. J.A. Emerton (Vetus Testamentum. Supplements 32), 131–145. Leiden: Brill.

Gross, Walter. 2009. Richter. Übersetzt und ausgelegt (Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Alten Testament). Freiburg: Herder Verlag.

Gross, Walter. 2011. “Das Richterbuch zwischen deuteronomistischem Geschichtswerk und Enneateuch”. In: Das deuteronomistische Geschichtswerk, eds. H.J. Stipp, R. Achenbach (Österreichische Biblische Studien 39), 177–205. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Guillaume, Philippe. 2004. Waiting for Josiah. The Judges (The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 385). London: T&T Clark.

Johnson, Benjamin J. 2010. “What Type of Son Is Samson? Reading Judges 13 as a Biblical Type-Scene”, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 53: 269–286.

Knauf, Ernst A. 2008. Josua (Zürcher Bibelkommentare. Altes Testament 6). Zürich: TVZ Theologischer Verlag.

Kratz, Reinhard G. 2005. The Composition of the Narrative Books of the Old Testament. London: T&T Clark.

Leonard-Fleckman, Mahri. 2017. “Samson and Our Reactions to the Strongman”. Word & World 37: 217–225.

Leonard-Fleckman, Mahri. 2024. “Samson, Saul, and the Creation of Judah’s History”. In: Zwischen Fiktion und Fakten/Between Fiction and Facts: Geschichte und Religion in den Samuelbüchern. History and Religion in the Books of Samuel, eds. J. Klein, D. Shepherd (Beiträge zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament 248), 181–196. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Levin, Christoph. 2011. “On the Cohesion and Separation of Books within the Enneateuch”. In: Pentateuch, Hexateuch, or Enneateuch? Identifying Literary Works in Genesis through Kings, eds. T. Dozeman, T. Römer, K. Schmid (Society of Biblical Literature. Ancient Israel and Its Literature 8), 127–154, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

McCarter, P. Kyle. 1980. I Samuel. A New Translation with Introduction, Notes and Commentary (The Anchor Yale Bible 8). New York: Doubleday.

Mobley, Gregory. 2006. Samson and the Liminal Hero in the Ancient Near East (The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 453). New York: A&C Black.

Müller, Reinhard. 2004. Königtum und Gottesherrschaft. Untersuchungen zur alttestamentlichen Monarchiekritik (Forschungen zum Alten Testament 2.3). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Müller, Reinhard. 2013. “1 Samuel 1 as the Opening Chapter of the Deuteronomistic History?”. In: Is Samuel among the Deuteronomists? Current Views on the Place of Samuel in a Deuteronomistic History, eds. C. Edenburg, J. Pakkala, (Society of Biblical Literature. Ancient Israel and Its Literature 16), 207–223. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

Naʼaman, Nadav. 2005. „The Danite Campaign Northward (Judges 17‒18) and the Migration of the Phocaeans to Massalia (Strabo IV 1,4)”. Vetus Testamentum 55 (1): 47–60.

O’Connell Robert H. 1996. The Rhetoric of the Book of Judges (Vetus Testamentum. Supplements 63). Leiden: Brill.

Organ, Barbara. 1987. Judges 17–21 and the Composition of the Book of Judges. Toronto.

Peckham, Brian. 1985. The Composition of the Deuteronomistic History (Harvard Semitic Monographs 35). Atlanta: Scholars Press.

Provan, Iain W. 1988. Hezekiah and the Book of Kings. A Contribution to the Debate about the Composition of the Deuteronomistic History (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 172). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Richter, Wolfgang. 1963. Traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Richterbuch (Bonner Biblische Beiträge 18). Bonn: Hanstein.

Savran, Georg. 2003. “Theophany as a Type Scene”. Prooftexts 23: 119–149.

Schmid, Konrad. 2012. The Old Testament: A Literary History. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Schneider, Tammi J. 2000. Judges (Berit Olam. Studies in Hebrew Narrative & Poetry). Collegeville: A Michael Glazier Book.

Stoebe, Hans J. 1973. Das erste Buch Samuelis (Kommentar zum Alten Testament 8.1). Gütersloh: Gütersloher.

Tsumura, David Toshio. 2006. The First Book of Samuel (New International Commentary on the Old Testament). Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Veijola, Timo. 1977. Das Königtum in der Beurteilung der deuteronomistischen Historiographie. Eine redaktionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, B 198). Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.

Williams, James G. 1980. “The Beautiful and the Barren. Conventions in Biblical Type-Scenes”. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 17: 107–119.

Würthwein, Ernst. 1994. “Erwägungen zum sog. Deuteronomistischen Geschichtswerk. Eine Skizze”. In: Studien zum deuteronomistischen Geschichtswerk, ed. E. Würthwein (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 227), 1–11. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Younger, K. Lawson. 2002. Judges and Ruth (The NIV Application Commentary). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia

Downloads

  • PDF (Język Polski)

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

1.
DZIADOSZ, Dariusz. The wayehî ʾîš [ʾeḥād] formula as the narrative framework of the Deuteronomistic account of the decline of the pre-monarchic period in Israel (Judg 13:2–1 Sam 10:16). Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia. Online. 30 June 2026. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 175-195. [Accessed 9 August 2026]. DOI 10.12775/BPTh.2026.009.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016): The Bible and History

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dariusz Antoni Dziadosz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 27
Number of citations: 0

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 1689-5150

eISSN: 2450-7059

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Français (Canada)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

formula wayehî ʾîš [ʾeḥād], Deuteronomistic redaction, the tradition block Judges 13:2–1 Samuel 10:16, Samson, Micah, Eli, Samuel, Saul
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop