Koncepcja analizy wielopoziomowej w pedagogice porównawczej: zastosowanie modelu Braya i T homasa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/AUNC_PED.2024.001Keywords
Bray and Thomas’ concept of multilevel analysis, comparative education, geographical location dimension,, demographic groups,, education and society aspectAbstract
The article aims to provide a detailed discussion of Bray and Thomas’ concept of multilevel analysis in the context of comparative education studies. Mark Bray and Murray Thomas developed a model that enables comprehensive comparisons of educational systems, taking into account their complex geographical, social, cultural, and political contexts. The author of the article
not only describes the structure of this model but also demonstrates its practical application in comparative studies. This allows for a better understanding of the interactions between various levels of analysis – from global educational systems, through national and local levels, to individual approaches in schools and classrooms. The examples of comparative studies included in the article illustrate how the concept of multilevel analysis can be implemented in practice, helping researchers to better interpret the differences and similarities between educational systems and to adapt educational reforms to specific local needs.
References
Alexander, R. „Comparing Classrooms and Schools”. W: Learning from Comparing: New Directions in Comparative Educational Research, Contexts, Classrooms and Outcomes, eds. R. Alexander, P. Broadfoot, D. Phillips, 109–111. Oxford: Symposium Books, 1999. https://doi.org/10.15730/books.1.
Anderson-Levitt, K. M. 2004. „Reading Lessons in Guinea, France, and the United States: Local Meanings or Global Culture?”. Comparative Education Review 48(3): 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1086/421178.
Babbie, E. Podstawy badań społecznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2008.
Baker, B., Farrie, D., Sciarra, D. G. Is School Funding Fair? A National Report Card. New Jersey: Education Law Center, 2018. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED584733.pdf
Benavot, A., Resh, N. 2001. „The Social Construction of the Local School Curriculum: Patterns of Diversity and Uniformity in Israeli Junior High
Schools”. Comparative Education Review 45(4): 504–536. https://doi.org/10.1086/447690.
Bereday, G. Z. Comparative Method in Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart& Winston, 1964.
Bray, M. „Control of Education: Issues and Tensions in Centralization and Decentralization”. W: Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, eds. R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, 201–222. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.
Bray, M., Koo, D. Y. R. Education and Society in Hong Kong and Macao: Comparative Perspectives on Continuity and Change. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, 2004.
Bray, M., Thomas, M. 1995. „Levels of Comparison in Educational Studies: Different Insights from Different Literatures and the Value of Multilevel Analyses”. Harvard Educational Review 65(3): 474–491. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.3.g3228437224v4877.
Broadfoot, P. „Comparative Research on Pupil Achievement: In Search of Validity, Reliability and Utility”. W: Learning from Comparing: New Directions in Comparative Educational Research, Contexts, Classrooms and Outcomes, eds. R. Alexander, P. Broadfoot, D. Phillips, 237–259. Oxford: Symposium Books, 1999.
Dale, R., Robertson, S. L. 2002. „The Varying Effects of Regional Organization Organizations as Subjects of Globalization of Education”. Comparative Education Review 46(1): 10–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/324052.
Davie, G. The Sociology of Religion: A Critical Agenda. New York: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2011.
Field, S., Kuczera, M., Pont, B. 2007. No More Failures: Ten Steps to Equity in Education, Education and Training Policy, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264032606-en.
Gmerek, T. 2016. „Badania edukacji z perspektywy pedagogiki porównawczej – kilka uwag teoretycznych”. Jakościowe Badania Pedagogiczne 1(1):15–35. https://doi.org/10.18276/jbp.2016.1.1-02.
Hega, G. M. „Regional Identity, Language and Education Policy in Switzerland”. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education 31(2) (2001): 205–223.
Lo, Tin-Yau J. 2004. „The Junior Secondary History Curricula in Hong Kong and Shanghai: A Comparative Study”. Comparative Education 40(3):
343– 361. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000274836.
Manzon, M. „Comparing Places”. W: Comparative Education Research. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, eds. M. Bray, B. Adamson, M. Mason, 97–136. Springer Science + Business Media; Comparative Education Research Centre, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6189-9_4.
Nowotniak, J. „Przestrzeń i miejsce jako kategorie badawcze w pedagogice. Wprowadzenie”. Jakościowe Badania Pedagogiczne 3/1 (2018): 5–10.
OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
Pachociński, R. Zarys pedagogiki porównawczej. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych, 1998.
Pantić, N., Wubbels, T., Mainhard, T. 2011. „Teacher Competence as a Basis for Teacher Education: Comparing Views of Teachers and Teacher Educators in Five Western Balkan Countries”. Comparative Education Review 55(2): 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1086/657154.
Silova, I. 2009. „Varieties of Educational Transformation: The Post-Socialist States of Central/Southeastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union”. W: International Handbook of Comparative Education, eds. R. Cowen, A. M. Kazamias, 295–320. Dordrecht: Springer International Handbooks of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6403-6_19.
Silova, I., Johnson, M., Heyneman, S. 2007. „Education and the Crisis of Social Cohesion in Azerbaijan and Central Asia”. Comparative Education Review 51(2): 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1086/512022.
TALIS 2018 Results. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/talis-2018-results- volume-i_1d0bc92a-en.html (dostęp: 31.03.2024).
TIMSS-2019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science. https://timss2019.org/reports/wp-content/themes/timssandpirls/download-center/TIMSS-2019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf (dostęp:31.03.2024).
Wojniak, J. „Lokalizacja geograficzna jako kontekst badań pedagogicznych: metodologiczne uwarunkowania komparatystyki edukacyjnej w ujęciu George’a Z. F. Beredaya”. W: Rozwój polskiej i ukraińskiej teorii i praktyki pedagogicznej na przestrzeni XIX–XXI wieku. Edukacyjny wymiar miejsca i przestrzeni, red. A. Haratyk, N. Zayachkivska, 9–22. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski, 2021.
World Development Report: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. 2018. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018 (dostęp: 31.03.2024).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 97
Number of citations: 0
