The Shroud Body Image Generation. Immanent or Transcendent Action?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2020.003

Keywords

Shroud Body Image, Fake hypothesis, Miracle, Natural event, Nazarene

Abstract

In this article, we shall study the mechanism of the Shroud body image formation with the help of both natural sciences and religion. The various possibilities can be divided into three groups of hypothesis: the first one is that of the fake, the second is the miracle and the third one of the natural event. The first hypothesis is discarded by the interdisciplinary work of the STURP (The Shroud of Turin Research Project) team. Their results do not support the hypothesis that the blood stains and the body image are due to a forger. In our opinion, even if the Miracle by God is possible, the proposed hypotheses of the supernatural event are theologically unacceptable. So, the natural one remains well supported by the “Ockham’s razor”. Obviously, this last model must be verified by experimental evidence. However, this result is not contrary to the hypothesis that the body image is the one of the Nazarene.

References

Antonacci Mark. 2000. The Resurrection of the Shroud. M. Evans and Co. Publishing, New York.

Allen Nicholas P.L. 1993. "Is the Shroud of Turin the first recorded photograph?" South Afric. J. Art Hist. 11: 23–32.

"A Summary of STURP’S Conclusions". STERA Inc., Barrie M. Schwortz Editor. https://www.shroud.com/78conclu.htm 1981.

Barbet Pierre. 1963. A Doctor at Calvary. translated from the French, Image Book, Garden City, New York.

Bergeron Joseph W. 2012. "The crucifixion of Jesus: Review of hypothesized mechanisms of death and implications of shock and trauma–induced coagulopaty." J. Forensic Legal Med. 19: 113–116.

Boi Marzia. 2017. “Pollen on the Shroud of Turin: The Probable Trace Left by Anointing and Embalming.” Archaeometry 59: 316–330.

Borrini Matteo and Luigi Garlaschelli. 2019. "A BPA Approach to the Shroud of Turin." J. Forensic Sci. 64: 137–143.

Bucklin Robert. 1982. “The Shroud of Turin: a Pathologist’s Wiewpoint.”Legal Med. Annu. (C, Wecth Editor, Sanford University); 33–39.

Bucklin Robert. 1997, ”An Autopsy on the Man of the Shroud.” Available online https://www.shroud.com/bucklin.htm

Curciarello Francesca, Veronica De Leo, Giovanni Fazio and Giuseppe Mandaglio. 2012. “The abrupt changes in the yellowed fibrils density in the Linen of Turin.” Radiat. Eff. Def. Solidis 167: 224–228.

Damon Paul E., et al. 1989. ‘’Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.’’ Nature 337: 611–615.

Di Lazzaro Paolo, Daniele Murra, Enrico Nichelatti, Antonino Santoni and Giuseppe Baldacchini. 2012.’’ Superficial and Shroud–like coloration of linen by short laser pulses in the vacuum ultraviolet.’’ Appl. Opt. 51: 8567–8578.

Dinegar Robert H. 1981. “ The Shroud of Turin – A Look at the Overall Picture.” The Living Church May 17: 9–11.

Fanti Giulio. 2010. ‘’Hypothesis Regarding the Formation of the Body Image on the Turin Shroud. A Critical Compendium.’’ J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 55: 060507–1–14.

Fazio Giovanni. and Giuseppe Mandaglio. 2011. ‘’Stochastic distribution of the fibrils that yielded the Shroud body image.’’ Radiat. Eff. Def. Solidis 166: 476–479.

Fazio Giovanni and Giuseppe Mandaglio. 2012. ‘’Can a latent image explain the characteristics of the body image?’’ Radiat. Eff. Def. Solids 167: 220–223.

Fazio Giovanni, Veronica De Leo, Francesca Curciarello and Giuseppe Mandaglio,. 2015. ‘’Comparison among the shroud body image formation mechanisms by linen fibrils distributions.’’ J. Tex. Institute 106: 896–899.

Fazio Giovanni, Giuseppe Mandaglio and Antonio Anastasi. 2017. “ Revisiting a pure stochastic mechanism to explain the body image formation on the Linen of Turin.”J. Tex. Institute 108: 1552–1555.

Fazio Giovanni.2016. ‘‘The scientific approach vs the open ‘Linen of Turin questions’ is it the right one?’’ J. Tex. Institute 107: 1607–1609.

Fazio Giovanni, Giuseppe Mandaglio and Antonio Anastasi. 2019. ‘’Describing, step by step, the Shroud body image formation.’’ Heritage 2: 34–38.

Garlaschelli Luigi. 2010. ‘’Life–Size Reproduction of the Shroud of Turin and its image.’’ J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 54: 040301–1–14.

Heller John H. and Alan D. Adler. 1981. “A Chemical Investigation of the Shroud of Turin.” Canadian Soc Forensic Sci. J. 14: 81–103.

Jackson John P., Eric J. Jumper and William R. Ercoline.1984. ‘’Correlation of image intensity on the Turin Shroud with 3D structure of a human body shape.’’ Appl. Opt. 23: 2244–2270.

Jackson John P. (2017), “The Shroud of Turin. A Critical Summary of Observation. Data and Hypothesis. Ver. 4.0. http://www.shroudofturin.com/Resources/CRTSUM.pdf.

Jumper Eric J. and Robert W. Mottern. 1980. ‘’Scientific investigation of the Shroud of Turin.’’ Appl. Opt. 19: 1909–1912.

Jumper Eric G., Alan D. Adler, John P. Jackson, Samuel F. Pellicori, John H. Heller and James R. Druzik. 1984. ‘’A comprehensive examination of the various stains and images on the Shroud of Turin’’ ACS Adv. Chem. Archaeol. Chem. III 205: 447–476 and references therein.

Morris Roger A., Larry A. Schwalbe and Ronald J. London. 1980. “X–Ray Fluorescence Investigation of the Shroud of Turin.” X–Ray Spectrometry 9: 40–47.

Mottern Robert W., Ronald J. London and Roger A. Morris, 1981. “Radiographic Examination of the Shroud of Turin– a Preliminary Report.” Material Evaluation 58: 39–44.

Nickell Joe. 1989. ‘’Unshrouding a Mystery, Science, Pseudoscience and the Cloth of Turin.’’ Skept. Inquires 13: 296–299.

Pellicori Samuel F. and Mark S. Evans, 1981. ‘’The Shroud of Turin through the microscope.’’ Archaeology 34: 34–43.

Schwalbe Larry A. and Raymond N. Rogers. 1982. ‘’Physics and Chemistry of the Shroud of Turin. A summary of the 1978 investigation.’’ Anal. Chim. Acta 135: 3–49.

United States Conference of Catholic Bishop, The New American Bible, Revised Edition. (Confraternity of Christian Doctrine Inc. Washington DC, 2010).

Zugibe Frederick T. 2005. The Crucifixion of Jesus: A Forensic Inquiry. M. Evans and Co. Publishing,. New York.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

Published

2019-12-23

How to Cite

1.
FAZIO, Giovanni. The Shroud Body Image Generation. Immanent or Transcendent Action?. Scientia et Fides. Online. 23 December 2019. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33-42. [Accessed 23 November 2024]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2020.003.

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia et Fides

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 826
Number of citations: 1