The Shroud Body Image Generation. Immanent or Transcendent Action?

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2020.003

Słowa kluczowe

Shroud Body Image, Fake hypothesis, Miracle, Natural event, Nazarene

Abstrakt

In this article, we shall study the mechanism of the Shroud body image formation with the help of both natural sciences and religion. The various possibilities can be divided into three groups of hypothesis: the first one is that of the fake, the second is the miracle and the third one of the natural event. The first hypothesis is discarded by the interdisciplinary work of the STURP (The Shroud of Turin Research Project) team. Their results do not support the hypothesis that the blood stains and the body image are due to a forger. In our opinion, even if the Miracle by God is possible, the proposed hypotheses of the supernatural event are theologically unacceptable. So, the natural one remains well supported by the “Ockham’s razor”. Obviously, this last model must be verified by experimental evidence. However, this result is not contrary to the hypothesis that the body image is the one of the Nazarene.

Bibliografia

Antonacci Mark. 2000. The Resurrection of the Shroud. M. Evans and Co. Publishing, New York.

Allen Nicholas P.L. 1993. "Is the Shroud of Turin the first recorded photograph?" South Afric. J. Art Hist. 11: 23–32.

"A Summary of STURP’S Conclusions". STERA Inc., Barrie M. Schwortz Editor. https://www.shroud.com/78conclu.htm 1981.

Barbet Pierre. 1963. A Doctor at Calvary. translated from the French, Image Book, Garden City, New York.

Bergeron Joseph W. 2012. "The crucifixion of Jesus: Review of hypothesized mechanisms of death and implications of shock and trauma–induced coagulopaty." J. Forensic Legal Med. 19: 113–116.

Boi Marzia. 2017. “Pollen on the Shroud of Turin: The Probable Trace Left by Anointing and Embalming.” Archaeometry 59: 316–330.

Borrini Matteo and Luigi Garlaschelli. 2019. "A BPA Approach to the Shroud of Turin." J. Forensic Sci. 64: 137–143.

Bucklin Robert. 1982. “The Shroud of Turin: a Pathologist’s Wiewpoint.”Legal Med. Annu. (C, Wecth Editor, Sanford University); 33–39.

Bucklin Robert. 1997, ”An Autopsy on the Man of the Shroud.” Available online https://www.shroud.com/bucklin.htm

Curciarello Francesca, Veronica De Leo, Giovanni Fazio and Giuseppe Mandaglio. 2012. “The abrupt changes in the yellowed fibrils density in the Linen of Turin.” Radiat. Eff. Def. Solidis 167: 224–228.

Damon Paul E., et al. 1989. ‘’Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.’’ Nature 337: 611–615.

Di Lazzaro Paolo, Daniele Murra, Enrico Nichelatti, Antonino Santoni and Giuseppe Baldacchini. 2012.’’ Superficial and Shroud–like coloration of linen by short laser pulses in the vacuum ultraviolet.’’ Appl. Opt. 51: 8567–8578.

Dinegar Robert H. 1981. “ The Shroud of Turin – A Look at the Overall Picture.” The Living Church May 17: 9–11.

Fanti Giulio. 2010. ‘’Hypothesis Regarding the Formation of the Body Image on the Turin Shroud. A Critical Compendium.’’ J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 55: 060507–1–14.

Fazio Giovanni. and Giuseppe Mandaglio. 2011. ‘’Stochastic distribution of the fibrils that yielded the Shroud body image.’’ Radiat. Eff. Def. Solidis 166: 476–479.

Fazio Giovanni and Giuseppe Mandaglio. 2012. ‘’Can a latent image explain the characteristics of the body image?’’ Radiat. Eff. Def. Solids 167: 220–223.

Fazio Giovanni, Veronica De Leo, Francesca Curciarello and Giuseppe Mandaglio,. 2015. ‘’Comparison among the shroud body image formation mechanisms by linen fibrils distributions.’’ J. Tex. Institute 106: 896–899.

Fazio Giovanni, Giuseppe Mandaglio and Antonio Anastasi. 2017. “ Revisiting a pure stochastic mechanism to explain the body image formation on the Linen of Turin.”J. Tex. Institute 108: 1552–1555.

Fazio Giovanni.2016. ‘‘The scientific approach vs the open ‘Linen of Turin questions’ is it the right one?’’ J. Tex. Institute 107: 1607–1609.

Fazio Giovanni, Giuseppe Mandaglio and Antonio Anastasi. 2019. ‘’Describing, step by step, the Shroud body image formation.’’ Heritage 2: 34–38.

Garlaschelli Luigi. 2010. ‘’Life–Size Reproduction of the Shroud of Turin and its image.’’ J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 54: 040301–1–14.

Heller John H. and Alan D. Adler. 1981. “A Chemical Investigation of the Shroud of Turin.” Canadian Soc Forensic Sci. J. 14: 81–103.

Jackson John P., Eric J. Jumper and William R. Ercoline.1984. ‘’Correlation of image intensity on the Turin Shroud with 3D structure of a human body shape.’’ Appl. Opt. 23: 2244–2270.

Jackson John P. (2017), “The Shroud of Turin. A Critical Summary of Observation. Data and Hypothesis. Ver. 4.0. http://www.shroudofturin.com/Resources/CRTSUM.pdf.

Jumper Eric J. and Robert W. Mottern. 1980. ‘’Scientific investigation of the Shroud of Turin.’’ Appl. Opt. 19: 1909–1912.

Jumper Eric G., Alan D. Adler, John P. Jackson, Samuel F. Pellicori, John H. Heller and James R. Druzik. 1984. ‘’A comprehensive examination of the various stains and images on the Shroud of Turin’’ ACS Adv. Chem. Archaeol. Chem. III 205: 447–476 and references therein.

Morris Roger A., Larry A. Schwalbe and Ronald J. London. 1980. “X–Ray Fluorescence Investigation of the Shroud of Turin.” X–Ray Spectrometry 9: 40–47.

Mottern Robert W., Ronald J. London and Roger A. Morris, 1981. “Radiographic Examination of the Shroud of Turin– a Preliminary Report.” Material Evaluation 58: 39–44.

Nickell Joe. 1989. ‘’Unshrouding a Mystery, Science, Pseudoscience and the Cloth of Turin.’’ Skept. Inquires 13: 296–299.

Pellicori Samuel F. and Mark S. Evans, 1981. ‘’The Shroud of Turin through the microscope.’’ Archaeology 34: 34–43.

Schwalbe Larry A. and Raymond N. Rogers. 1982. ‘’Physics and Chemistry of the Shroud of Turin. A summary of the 1978 investigation.’’ Anal. Chim. Acta 135: 3–49.

United States Conference of Catholic Bishop, The New American Bible, Revised Edition. (Confraternity of Christian Doctrine Inc. Washington DC, 2010).

Zugibe Frederick T. 2005. The Crucifixion of Jesus: A Forensic Inquiry. M. Evans and Co. Publishing,. New York.

Scientia et Fides

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2019-12-23

Jak cytować

1.
FAZIO, Giovanni. The Shroud Body Image Generation. Immanent or Transcendent Action?. Scientia et Fides [online]. 23 grudzień 2019, T. 8, nr 1, s. 33–42. [udostępniono 2.1.2026]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2020.003.

Numer

Tom 8 Nr 1 (2020)

Dział

Artykuły

Licencja

Prawa autorskie (c) 2019 Scientia et Fides

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.

  • Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
  • Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
  • Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony

PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>

Statystyki

Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 1260
Liczba cytowań: 1