Some Notes on the Phenomenon of Solitude

Christophe Perrin

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/PCh.2020.001

Abstract


In philosophy, the problem of solitude has traditionally been either ignored or treated trivially. And when philosophy tackles solitude, it often relies on two unconvincing presuppositions. The first is that to be alone one has to put oneself first; the second is that solitude can be both good and bad. What ensues from this two-pronged approach to solitude? Solitary solitude is both sought-after and happy, and lonely solitude both sustained and sad. But once the distinction has been set up, solitude is still not sufficiently described, because neither form of solitude is really solitude. The first one is sheer aloneness, and the second refers to loneliness, far removed from the phenomenon of soloist solitude.


Keywords


solitude; aloneness; loneliness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiel, H.-F. (1976). Journal intime (1847-1881). Vol. 6. Lausanne: L’Âge d’homme.

Arendt, H. (1958). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Cleveland/New York: Meridian Books.

Arendt, H. (2003). Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken Books.

Hugo, V. (1987). Choses vues. In Histoire. Paris: Robert Laffont.

Petrarch (1346). De vita solitaria.

Sartre, J. P. (1943). L’être et le néant. Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard.

Seneca (64). Epistulae morales ad Lucilium.

Valéry, P. (1962). L’Idée fixe ou Deux hommes à la mer. Paris: Gallimard.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Partnerzy platformy czasopism