“I Will Never Disown You” (Mk. 14:31): A Psychological Perspective on Peter’s Denials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TiCz.2017.046Keywords
Peter’s denials, False memory, Phantom recollection, Recollection rejectionAbstract
This article attempts to explore the effects of memory retention, phantom recollection, and recollection rejection on the quest for the Apostle Peter’s denials (Mt. 26:31–35, 69–75; Mk 14:27–31, 66–72; Lk. 22:31–34, 54–62; Jn. 13:37–38, 18:15–18, 25–27). Phantom recollection refers that sometimes gist-based false memories at high levels are strong enough to elicit falsely recalled experiences. While individuals retrieve true recognition of their instantiating studied scenarios rather than false-but-gist-consistent lures by detecting relevant signal via a memory-editing operation called recollection rejection. This article examines the extent to which Peter’s memory retention sustains and moreover presumes that phantom recollection leads Peter to override his own promise, but with the assistance of detecting the crucial signals (i.e., the rooster crows, Mt. 26:74b, Mk. 14:72a, Lk. 22:60b, Jn. 18:27b; Jesus straightforwardly looks at him, Lk. 22:61a) that evokes the recollection rejection process, he retrieves his true memories. For the first time, if any, the attempt to interpret the pericope of Peter’s denials through the lens of the false memory theory could elucidate our hermeneutical understandings from the nature of humankind perspective.
References
Adamczewski, B., Hypertextuality and Historicity in the Gospels, Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main 2013, pp. 96–117.
Adamczewski, B., The Gospel of Mark: A Hypertextual Commentary, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2014, p. 173.
Allison, D.C., Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination, and History, London: SPCK 2010.
Atkinson R.C. and Shiffrin R.M., "Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes", Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2 (2008), pp. 89–195.
Bailey, K.E., "Informal controlled oral tradition and the synoptic Gospels", Themelios 20 (1995), pp. 4–11.
Bale, A.J., Genre and Narrative Coherence in the Acts of the Apostles, C. Keith (Ed.), Bloomsbury 2015.
Bauckham, R., Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing 2006.
Bauckham, R., "Eyewitnesses and critical history: A response to Jens Schröter and Craig Evans", Journal for the Study of the New Testament 31 (2008), pp. 221–235.
Bennema, C., "The historical reliability of the Gospel of John", Foundations 67 (2014), pp. 4–25.
Brainerd, C.J., and Reyna, V.F., "Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory", Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 (2002), pp. 164–169.
Brainerd, C.J., Wright, R., Reyna, V.F., and Mojardin, A.H., "Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001), pp. 307–327.
Byrskog, S., Story as History – History as Story. The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History, Boston: Brill 2002, pp. 65–94.
Byrskog, S. The Meal and the Temple. Probing the Cult-Critical Implications of the Last Supper, in: D. Hellholm and D. Sänger (Eds.), The Eucharist – Its Origins and Contexts, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2017, pp. 436-452.
Crook, Z.A., "Collective memory distortion and the quest for the historical Jesus", Journal of the Study of the Historical Jesus 11 (2013), pp. 53–76.
Crook, Z.A., "Matthew, memory theory and the new no quest", HTS Theological Studies 70 (2014), pp. 1–11.
Dewey, A.J., The Eyewitness of History, [in:] R.T. Fortna and T. Thatcher (Ed.), Jesus in Johannine Tradition, Louisville KY: Westminster John Knox 2001, pp. 59–70.
Dewey, A.J., "The memorable invention of the death of Jesus", HTS Teologiese/Theological Studies 72 (2016), doi: 10.4102/hts.v72i4.3222.
Dunn, J.D.G., Jesus Remembered, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 2003, pp. 115–124.
Dunn, J.D.G., "Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: An Inquiry into the Character of Earliest Christianity", SCM Press 2006.
Dunn, J.D.G., "Kenneth Bailey’s theory of oral tradition: Critiquing Theodore Weeden’s critique", Journal of the Study of the Historical Jesus 7 (2009), pp. 44–62.
Gigerenzer, G. and Goldstein, D.G., "The recognition heuristic: A decade of research", Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011), pp. 100–121.
Goldstein, D.G. and Gigerenzer, G., "Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic", Psychological Review 109 (2002), pp. 75–90.
Guyot, G.H., "Peter denies his Lord", The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 4 (1942), pp. 111–118.
Keener, C.S., The Historical Jesus of the Gospels, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing 2009.
Kloppenborg, J.S., "Memory, performance, and the sayings of Jesus", Journal of the Study of the Historical Jesus 10 (2012), pp. 97–132.
Kümmel, W.G., Introduction to the New Testament, London: SCM 1975, pp. 98, 120, 151, 246.
Lu, Y., "A theological, ancient Hellenistic, and psychological look at the dreams of Pharaoh’s chief cupbearer and chief baker (Gen. 40: 5-13, 16-18)", International Journal of Dream Research 9 (2016), pp. 46–57.
Lu, Y., "Love your neighbor as yourself (Lk. 10:27b): The parable of the good Samaritan in the light of regulatory focus theory", EC Psychology and Psychiatry 5 (2017), pp. 1–6.
Marche, T.A. and Brainerd, C.J., "The role of phantom recollection in false recall", Memory and Cognition 40 (2012), pp. 902–917.
Mclver, R.K., Memory, Jesus, and the Synoptic Gospels, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature 2011.
Mclver, R.K., "Eyewitnesses as guarantors of the accuracy of the Gospel tradition in the light of psychological research", Journal of Biblical Literature 131 (2012), pp. 529–546.
Mills, M.G., "Peter’s denials. Part I: Important background considerations", Journal of Dispensational Theology 17 (2013), pp. 107–117.
Mills, M.G., "Peter’s denials. Part II: An examination of the narratives", Journal of Dispensational Theology 17 (2013), pp. 207–226.
Neyrey, J.H., "The apologetic use of the transfiguration in 2 Peter 1: 16–21", The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 42 (1980), pp. 504–519.
Nieznański, M., "The role of reinstating generation operations in recognition memory and reality monitoring", Polish Psychological Bulletin 45 (2014), pp. 363–371.
Perkins, P., Introduction to the Synoptic Gospels, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 2009, pp. 250–253.
Redman, J., "How accurate are eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the eyewitnesses in the light of psychological research", Journal of Biblical Literature 129 (2010), pp. 177–197.
Riesner, R., Paul’s Early Period: Chronology, Mission Strategy, Theology, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 1998, pp. 35–58.
Rotello, C.M. and Heit, E., "Two process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject?", Journal of Memory and Language 40 (1999), pp. 432–453.
Rotello, C.M., Macmillan, N.A., and Reeder, J.A., "Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model", Psychological Review 111 (2004), pp. 588–616.
Sanders, E.P., The Historical Figures of Jesus, New York: Penguin 1993.
Tulving, E., Elements of Episodic Memory, London: Oxford University Press 1985.
Wickelgren, W.A., "Alcoholic intoxication and memory storage dynamics", Memory and Cognition 3 (1975), pp. 385–389.
Yonelinas, A.P., Dobbins, I., Szymanski, M.D., Dhaliwal, H.S. and King, L., "Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection", Consciousness and Cognition 5 (1996), pp. 418–441.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 313
Number of citations: 0