Recognition or Guidance
Two Anthropologies of Revelation in Sethian Gnosticism and Mandaeism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TiCz.2026.009Keywords
revelation, Sethian Gnosticism, Mandaeism, recognition, guidance, theological anthropologyAbstract
This article compares Sethian Gnosticism and Mandaeism as two structurally distinct anthropologies of revelation. In the Sethian tradition, revelation is an act of ontological recognition: the revealer discloses to the recipient what the recipient already is: a nature that precedes the act of disclosure and makes it possible. In the Mandaean tradition, revelation takes the form of guidance: the revealer enters into a relationship that must be sustained through repeated ritual practice, and the soul's salvation depends on whether that relationship is maintained. The difference is not one of emphasis but of anthropological structure. The article argues that these two patterns – recognition and guidance – are not extinct historical options but live possibilities that any theology of revelation implicitly inhabits.
References
Arabestani, Mehrdad. “The Mandaeans’ Religious System: From Mythos to Logos.” Iran and the Caucasus 20, no. 3-4 (2016): 179-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573384X-20160302.
Buckley, Jorunn J. “Polemics and Exorcism in Mandaean Baptism.” History of Religions 47, no. 2/3 (2007): 156-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/524208.
Buckley, Jorunn J. The Mandaeans: Ancient Texts and Modern People. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Buckley, Jorunn J. “Why Once Is Not Enough: Mandaean Baptism (Maṣbuta) as an Example of a Repeated Ritual.” History of Religions 29, no. 1 (1989): 23-34.
Burns, Dylan M. Apocalypse of the Alien God: Platonism and the Exile of Sethian Gnosticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.
Drower, Ethel S. The Canonical Prayerbook of the Mandaeans. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1959.
Häberl, Charles G. “Mandaeism in Antiquity and the Antiquity of Mandaeism.” Religion Compass 6, no. 5 (2012): 262-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2012.00349.x.
King, Karen L. The Secret Revelation of John. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Layton, Bentley. The Gnostic Scriptures: A New Translation With Annotations and Introductions. New York: Doubleday, 1987.
MacRae, George W. “The Ego-Proclamation in Gnostic Sources.” In The Trial of Jesus, ed. Ernst Bammel, 122-134. London: Students Christian Movement Press, 1970.
Nasoraia, Brikha H. “Probing the Relationships Between Mandaeans (the Followers of John the Baptist), Early Christians, and Manichaeans.” Religions 16, no. 1 (2024): 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010014.
Poirier, Paul-Hubert. La pensée première à la triple forme: NH XIII, 1. Québec ; Louvain et al.: Presses de l’Université Laval Peeters, 2006.
Rudolph, Kurt. “The Relevance of Mandaean Literature to the Study of Near Eastern Religions.” ARAM Periodical, no. 16 (2004): 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/ARAM.16.0.504668.
Segelberg, Eric. Maṣbuta: Studies in the Ritual of Mandaean Baptism. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1958.
Turner, John D. “Introduction: NHC XIII,I*: TRIMORPHIC PROTENNOIA 35*,1-50*,24.” In Nag Hammadi Codices XI, XII, XIII, ed. Charles W. Hedrick, 371-401. Leiden ; Boston: BRILL, 1990.
Turner, John D. trans. “NHC XIII,I: Trimorphic Protennoia.” In Nag Hammadi Codices XI, XII, XIII, ed. Charles W. Hedrick, 371-454. Leiden ; Boston: BRILL, 1990.
Turner, John D. “Ritual in Gnosticism.” In Gnosticism and Later Platonism: Themes, Figures, and Texts, ed. John D. Turner and Ruth D. Majercik, 83-139. Atlanta: SBL, 2000.
Turner, John D. “Sethian Gnosticism: A Literary History.” In Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, and Early Christianity, ed. Charles W. Hedrick and Robert Hodgson, 55-86. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1986.
Williams, Michael Allen. Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-10-07 (2)
- 2026-06-30 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Łukasz Koszałka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 62
Number of citations: 0
