Neurophilosophical Anthropology of Thomas Fuchs in Dialogue with the Theological Image of Man as a Possible Response to Naturalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TiCz.2024.028Keywords
neuroscience, freedom, reductionism, Thomas Fuchs, Körper–Leib, mind–bodyAbstract
Classical approaches to theological anthropology—based on the corporeal and spiritual structure of man—link acts of the mind to the soul. In contrast, the rapid development of neuroscience reveals that the mental sphere is anchored in the body, whereas neurophilosophical concepts—as materialistic and reductionist approaches—often ignore the category of the soul and explicitly question human freedom. The purpose of this article is to present the anthropological approach of the neurophilosopher and psychiatrist Thomas Fuchs (born 1958) as a tool that, on the one hand, incorporates the basic achievements of neuroscience, and on the other, proposes an image of man that is consistent with Christian anthropology. While drawing on contemporary enactivism (which aspires to be an alternative to dualistic and materialistic views of man), he uses the categories of Leib and Körper, which allow him to avoid reductionism and incorporate contemporary science. A particular common point between neuroscientific reflection and theological reflection is the manner in which they perceive the issue of human freedom as a process that is “embodied.”
References
Alcaro, Antonio, Carta, Stefano, Panskepp, Jaak. „The Affective Core of the Self: A Neuro-Archetypical Perspective on the Foundations of Human (and Animal) Subjectivity.” Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017): 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01424.
Borghi, Luca. „L’antropologia tomista e il body-mind problem alla ricerca di un contributo mancante.” Acta Philosophica 1 no. 2 (1992): 279–292.
Borsche, Tilman. „Leib, Körper.” W Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, red. Joachim Ritter, Karlfried Gründer, 173–178. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 1980.
Damasio, Antonio. „Feelings of Emotion and the Self.” Annuals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1001, no. 1 (2006), 253–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.014.
Fuchs, Thomas. „Are Mental Illnesses Diseases of the Brain?” W A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Context of Neuroscience, red. Jan Slaby, Suparna Choudhury, 332–344. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2012.
Fuchs, Thomas. Das Gehirn – ein Beziehungsorgan. Eine phänomenologisch-ökologische Konzeption. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 2017.
Fuchs, Thomas. „Der Begriff der Person in der Psychiatrie.” Nervenarzt 73 (2002): 239–246.
Fuchs, Thomas. „Können Gehirne entscheiden? Subjektivität und Willensfreiheit”. W Willensfreiheit – eine Illusion? Naturalismus und Psychiatrie, red. Martin Heinze, Thomas Fuchs, Friedel M. Reischies, 49–62. Berlin: Parodos, 2006.
Fuchs, Thomas, „The Brain – A Mediating Organ.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 18, no. 7–8 (2011): 196–221.
Fuchs, Thomas. The phenomenology of body memory. W Body Memory, Metaphor and Movement, red. Sabine C. Koch, Thomas Fuchs, Michela Summa, Cornelia Müller, 9–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2012.
Fuchs Thomas. „Ökologie des Gehirns. Eine sytematische Sichtweise für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.” Der Nervenarzt 76 (2005): 1–10.
Góźdź, Krzysztof. „Monizm czy dualizm antropologiczny?” Studia Theologica Varsaviensia 48 (2010): 45–61.
Gut, Przemysław. „Neurofilozofia o wolnej woli i moralnej odpowiedzialności.” W Mózg – umysł – dusza. Spór o adekwatną antropologię, red. Karol Jasiński, Zdzisław Kieliszek, Marian Machinek, 41–52. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego, 2014.
Kongregacja Nauki Wiary, „List do biskupów o niektórych zagadnieniach dotyczących eschatologii Recentiores Episcoporum.” W W trosce o pełnię wiary. Dokumenty Kongregacji Nauki Wiary 1966–1994. 153–157. Tarnów: Wydawnictwo Biblos, 1979.
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A. „Natura.” W Powszechna Encyklopedia Filozofii. Dostęp: 30.09.2023. http://www.ptta.pl/pef/pdf/n/natura.pdf.
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A. „Osoba.” W Powszechna Encyklopedia Filozofii. Dostęp: 26.01.2024. http://www.ptta.pl/pef/pdf/o/osoba.pdf.
Ladaria, Luis, Wprowadzenie do antropologii teologicznej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM, 1997.
Miłkowski, Marcin. „Sztuczna inteligencja i obliczeniowe teorie umysłu.” W Przewodnik po filozofii umysłu, red. Marcin Miłkowski, Robert Poczobut, 579–618. Kraków: WAM, 2012.
Müller, Gerhard L. Katholische Dogmatik. Für Studium und Praxis der Theologie. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 1996.
Paris, Leonardo. Sulla libertà. Prospettive di teologia trinitaria tra neuroscienze e filosofia. Roma: Città Nuova, 2012.
Peterson, Erik. „Obraz Boży w myśli św. Ireneusza.” Christianitas 63–64 (2016): 191–200.
Sanguineti, Juan José, Trends in Philosophy of Mind and in Philosophy of Neuroscience. W Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update. Bringing the Divide, red. Pasqual A. Gargiulo, Humberto L. Mesones-Arroyo, 23–37. Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.
Sgreccia, Elio. Personalist Bioethics. Foundations and Applications. Philadepphia: Natl Catholic Bioethics Center, 2012.
Tomasz z Akwinu, Summa Theologiae I. Dostęp 25.01.2023. https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~ST.I.
Woźniak, Robert J. „Materialno-biologiczny wymiar obrazu Bożego w człowieku.” Scientia et Fides 2, no. 2 (2014): 271–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2014.022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Klaudiusz Mann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 257
Number of citations: 0