The Hard Problem of Consciousness in the Light of Onto-Gnoseological Uncertainty
Słowa kluczowe
hard problem of consciousness, consciousness and brain, subjective reality, qualia, onto-gnoseological uncertaintyAbstrakt
Purpose: The main purpose of this article is to show that the paradigm of viewing the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness in analytic philosophy makes it a pseudo-problem rather than a ‘hard problem’. The objectives of this research included showing the reasons for the authors’ thesis, demonstrating the irreducibility of consciousness as a special layer of reality, and proposing a way to overcome these difficulties.
Design/methodology/approach: In this article, the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness is viewed from the standpoints of the transcendental-phenomenological and dialectical approaches and is analyzed through the prism of the principle of onto-gnoseological uncertainty.
Findings: It is shown that the way of formulating the ‘hard problem’ in the analytical philosophical tradition inevitably makes it a pseudo-problem. At the same time, with the consistent realization of the principle of onto-gnoseological uncertainty, the antinomy of solutions to the problems of consciousness is eliminated, which opens up a way to a productive solution of problems related to the interpretation of consciousness both in natural sciences and in philosophy.
Originality/value: This research reveals the methodological potential of applying the principle of onto-gnoseological uncertainty to the problems that arise in modern philosophy in connection with the achievements of natural sciences.
Bibliografia
Bielas, Jacek. 2017. “The View from Within the Brain: Does Neurofeedback Close the Gap?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (9–10): 133–155.
Carruthers, Glenn, Schier, Elizabeth. 2017a. “Introduction: The Hard Problem of Consciousness.” Topoi 36 (1): 1–3.
Carruthers, Glenn, Schier, Elizabeth. 2017b. “Why are We Still Being Hornswoggled? Dissolving the Hard Problem of Consciousness.” Topoi 36 (1): 67–79.
Chalmers, David. J. 1997. The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Littl Brown and Co.
Descartes, Rene. 1989. Writings in two volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow.
Dubrovsky, David I. 2012. “The Subjective Reality and the Brain. On the Question about the Half-Century Experience of Developing the ‘Hard Problem of Consciousness’ in Analytic Philosophy.” In Epistemology: Development Perspectives, by Lektorskiy, V.A., 229–273. Moscow: «Kanon+».
Hendry, Robin F. 2006. “Is There Downward Causation in Chemistry?” In Philosophy of Chemistry, by edited D. Baird et al., 173–191. Boston: Springer.
Horst, Steven. 2014. “Beyond Reduction: From Naturalism to Cognitive Pluralism.” Mind & Matter 12 (2): 197–244.
Kuznetsov, Anton V. 2014. “Cognitive Research and the Problem of Mental Causality.” Questions of Philosophy 3: 133–143.
Lamza, Lukas 2014. “Six Phases of Cosmic Chemistry.” Hyle – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 20 (1): 165–192.
Lebedev, Vladimir I. 2002. Psychology and Psycholpathology of Loneliness and Group Isolation. Moscow: Unity.
Mamchenkov, Dmitry V. 2014. Objectivity and Historicism. Moscow: RUDN.
Mamchenkov, Dmitry V. 2017. „The ‘Hard Problem’ in Analytic Philosophy.” Newsletter of RUDN. Series “Philosophy” 21 (2): 222–229.
McBride, Raymond. 2014. “Towards a Sublime State of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (11–12): 19–40.
McClelland, Tom. 2017. “The Problem of Consciousness: Easy, Hard or Tricky?” Topoi 36 (1): 17–30.
Mednikov, Boris M. 1982. Axioms of Biology. Moscow: Znanie.
Menon, Sangeetha. 2014. “Beginnings: Biological and Philosophical Accounts of Consciousness.” In Brain, Self and Consciousness, edited by S. Menon, 37–60. New Delhi: Springer.
Metlov, Vladimir I. 2003. „A Complex Approach to the Problem of Consciousness.” In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Philosophy of Consciousness: History and Modernity’’ dedicated to the memory of A.F. Gryaznov, Professor at Moscow State University (1948–2001), 247–250. Moscow: “Sovremennye Tetradi” Publishing House.
Naidysh, Viacheslav M. 2017. “Mythmaking in the Activity of Consciousness.” Questions of Philosophy 5: 26–35.
Russel, Bertran. 1999. Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Tomsk: Vodoley.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2002. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Moscow: TERRA-Book Club Republic.
Searle, John. 2002. A Re-Discovery of the Mind. Moscow: Idea-Press.
Smith, Cristopher U. M., Whitaker, Harry. 2014. Brain, mind and consciousness in the history of neuroscience. Dordrecht: Springer.
Smith, Roger. 2015. “History and the hard problem.” Metascience 24 (3): 413–416.
Smythies, John. 2017. “The Role of Brain Mechanisms in the Generation of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (1–2): 254–263.
Swaab, Dick. 2014. We are Our Brains: From the Womb to Alzheimer's. St. Petersburg: Ivan Limbakh Publishing House.
Tegmark, Max. 2015. “Consciousness as a State of Matter.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 76: 238–270.
Tsou, Jonathan Y. 2013. “Origins of the Qualitative Aspects of Consciousness: Evolutionary Answers to Chalmers’ Hard Problem.” In Origins of Mind, edited by Liz Swan, 259–269. Dordrecht: Springer.
Varkhotov, Taras A. 2003. “Cartesian Anthropology as the Epistemological Framework of Modern Philosophy of Consciousness.” In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Philosophy of Consciousness: History and Modernity’’ dedicated to the memory of A.F. Gryaznov, Professor at Moscow State University (1948–2001), 30–41. Moscow: “Sovremennye Tetradi” Publishing House.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1994. “Philosophical Studies.” In Philosophical Works. Moscow: Gnosis.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 529
Liczba cytowań: 0