Neuroscientific findings in the light of Aquinas' understanding of the human being
Słowa kluczowe
Thomas Aquinas, Nancey Murphy, hylomorphism, physicalism, neuroscienceAbstrakt
Neuroscience is one of the most propulsive of all sciences and very often, directly or not, it tries to answer the question: What is man? However, neuroscientific research does not acknowledge the concept of man as a unity of body and soul. The modern scientific research paradigm therefore rests on physicalism, while theologians are turning towards non-reductive physicalism. In this paper, we will highlight a few key points of the theory of philosopher and theologian Nancey Murphy, which is based on the deconstruction of Aquinas's thought about the human soul and its reduction to the physical. We aim to show that she neglected the full scope of Aquinas teachings. In the second part of this paper, for the scientific paradigm of humans we shall propose new-old hylomorphism, and try to complement certain points of such a system with modern neuroscientific views. The aim of this work is to offer advice for the interdisciplinary cooperation between neuroscience, philosophy and theology alongside the guidelines of Aristotelian-Thomistic hylomorphism.Bibliografia
Aristotle. 1931. On the Soul, translated by J. A. Smith. Available at: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.html.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1947. The Summa Theologica, translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Benziger Bros. edition. Available at: http://dhspriory.org/thomas and www.corpusthomisticum.org.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1955–1957. Contra Gentiles, translated by Anton C. Pegis, James F. Anderson, Vernon J. Bourke and Charles J. O'Neil. New York: Hanover House.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1949. Quaestio disputata de anima, translated by John Patrick Rowan. St. Louis & London: B. Herder Book Co.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1949. De spiritualibus creaturis, translated by Mary C. Fitzpatrick and John J. Wellmuth. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1951. Sentencia libri De anima, translated by Kenelm Foster, O.P. and Sylvester Humphries, O.P. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Battro, Antonio M., Stanislas Dehaene, Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo and Wolf J. Singer, eds. 2013. Neurosciences and the Human Person: New Perspectives on Human Activities. The Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Battro, Antonio M., and others. 2013. “Human Neuroplasticity and Education. Final Statement.” In Neurosciences and the Human Person: New Perspectives on Human Activities, edited by Battro, Antonio M., Stanislas Dehaene, Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo and Wolf J. Singer, 233–237. The Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Card. Cottier, Georges M.M. and others. 2013. “Neurosciences and the Human Person: New Perspectives on Human Activities. Final Statement.” In Neurosciences and the Human Person: New Perspectives on Human Activities, edited by Battro, Antonio M., Stanislas Dehaene, Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo and Wolf J. Singer, 305–315. The Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Singer, Wolf. 2013. “The Neuronal Correlate of Consciousness: Unity in Time rather than Space?” In Neurosciences and the Human Person: New Perspectives on Human Activities, edited by Battro, Antonio M., Stanislas Dehaene, Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo and Wolf J. Singer, 51–68. The Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Becker, Patrick, 2008. In der Bewusstseinsfalle. Geist und Gehirn in der Diskussion von Theologie, Philosophie und Naturwissenschaften. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Becker, Patrick. 2015. U stupici svijesti? Duh i mozak u raspravi teologije, filozofije i prirodnih znanosti. Kršćanska sadašnjost.
Bernacer, Javier, Jose Angel Lombo and Jose Ignacio Murillo, eds. 2015. Habits: plasticity, learning and freedom. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences.
Brajčić, Rudolf. 1976. “Problem duša – tijelo.” Obnovljeni život 31:222–234.
Campodonico, Angelo. “Philosophical Anthropology facing Aquinas' Concept of Human Nature.” Jacques Maritain Center: Thomistic Institute. Available at: www3.nd.edu/~maritain/.
Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
Clarke, Norris SJ. 2001. The One and the Many: A Contemporary Thomistic Metaphysics. Notre Dame Press.
De Haan, Daniel, and Geoffrey A. Meadows. 2013. “Aristotle and the Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:213–230.
Dehaene, Stanislas. 2014. Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts. New York.
Flaman, Paul. 2008. “The Human Soul: A Catholic Theological Response to Non-Reductive Physicalism”. Available at: http://www.metanexus.net/essay/human-soul-catholic-theological-response-non-reductive-physicalism.
Freddoso, Alfred J. “Good News, Your Soul Hasn't Died Quite Yet.” University of Notre Dame. Available at: www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/soul.htm.
Freeman, Walter J. 2008. “Nonlinear Brain Dynamics and Intention According to Aquinas.” Mind & Matter 6:207–234.
Freeman, Walter J. 2000. How Brains Make Up Their Minds. Columbia University Press.
Gasser, Georg. 2010. “Is Hylomorphism a Neglected Option in Philosophy of Mind?” In Soul: A Comparative Approach, edited by Christian Kanzian and Muhammad Legenhausen, 43-63. Ontos Verlag.
Gilson, Etienne. 2002. Thomism: the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas, trans. Laurence K. Shook and Armand Maurer. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Haeffner, Gerd. 2005. Philosophische Anthropologie. Kohlhammer, 4. edition.
Haeffner, Gerd. 2003. Filozofska antropologija. Breza.
Hilborn, Robert C. 2001. Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics. An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.
Jaworski, William. 2011. Philosophy of Mind: A Comprehensive Introduction, new edn. Wiley-Blackwell.
Jeffreys, Derek S. 2004. “The Soul is Alive and Well: Non-reductive Physicalism and Emergent Mental Properties.” Theology and Science 2:205–225.
Kraft, Eduard, Balázs Gulyás and Ernst Poppel (eds.). 2009. Neural Correlates of Thinking. Springer.
Larrivee, Denis, and Adriana Gini. 2014. “Is the philosophical construct of 'habitus operativus bonus' compatible with the modern neuroscience concept of human flourishing through neuroplasticity? A consideration of prudence as a multidimensional regulator of virtue.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:1–4.
Murphy, Nancey. 2006. Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies?, new edn. Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, Nancey. 1998. “Non-reductive Physicalism: Philosophical Issues.” In Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature, edited by Warren S. Brown, Nancey Murphy, and H. Newton Maloney, 127–148. MN: Fortress Press.
Murphy, Nancey. 2004. “Response to Derek Jeffreys.” Theology and Science 2:227–230.
Northoff, Georg. 2014. Unlocking the Brain. Volume I: Coding, new edn. Oxford University Press.
Northoff, Georg. 2014. Unlocking the Brain. Volume II: Consciousness, new edn. Oxford University Press.
Pasnau, Robert. 2004. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. A Philosophical Study of Summa theologiae Ia 75–89. Cambridge University Press.
Paul II, John. 1998. Encyclical letter Fides et Ratio. Rome, 14. September.
Ratzinger, Joseph. 1988. Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life, 2nd ed., translated by Michael Waldstein. Translation edited by Aidan Nichols. The Catholic University of America Press.
Re, Giuseppe Del, ed. 1992. Brain Research and the Mind-Body Problem: Epistemological and Metaphysical Issues. Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm.
Calvo, Francesco. 1992. “The Mind-Body Problem and Popper's Epistemology.” In Brain Research and the Mind-Body Problem: Epistemological and Metaphysical Issues, edited by Re, Giuseppe Del, 153–175. Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm.
Henrici, Peter. 1992. “The holistic anthropological model.” In Brain Research and the Mind-Body Problem: Epistemological and Metaphysical Issues, edited by Re, Giuseppe Del, 126–139. Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm.
Lejeune, Jérôme. 1992. “A geneticist's point of view.” In Brain Research and the Mind-Body Problem: Epistemological and Metaphysical Issues, edited by Re, Giuseppe Del, 24–25. Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm.
Marcozzi, Vittorio. 1992. “The brain and the psyche in the spiritualist scholastic view.” In Brain Research and the Mind-Body Problem: Epistemological and Metaphysical Issues, edited by Re, Giuseppe Del, 122–126. Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm.
Runggaldier, Edmund. 2006. “The Aristotelian Alternative to Functionalism and Dualism.” In Die menschliche Seele. Brauchen wir den Dualismus?, edited by B. Niederbacher & E. Runggaldier, 221–248. Ontos.
Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1979. Letter on Certain Questions concerning Eschatology. May 17. Available at: http://www.vatican.va.
Savard, François. 2007. “The Recent Travails of Hylomorphism.” Études maritainiennes-Maritain Studies 23:41–52.
Schmitz, Kenneth L. 2001. “The Personalists Philosophy of Karol Wojtyla.” In The New Catholic Encyclopaedia: Jubilee Volume (The Wojtyla Years), Vol. 20, edited by Berard L. Marthaler. The Catholic University of America, Gale Group.
Sorondo, Marcelo Sánchez, ed. 2007. What Is Our Real Knowledge About the Human Being? Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm.
Sorondo, Marcelo Sánchez. 2007. “Philosophy, science, faith.” In What Is Our Real Knowledge About the Human Being?, edited by Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, 127–161. Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm
.
Vidal, Fernando. 2007. “Person and Brain: A Historical Perspective From Within the Christian Tradition.” In What Is Our Real Knowledge About the Human Being?, edited by Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, 3–15. Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm.
Wolfe, Tom. 2000. “Sorry, But Your Soul Just Died.” In Hooking Up, edited by Tom Wolfe, 89–109. Picador USA.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 1424
Liczba cytowań: 8
