Artificial Intelligence, Neurodiversity, and Trust: An Exploratory Overview
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2025.011Słowa kluczowe
trust, reliance, neurodiversity, artificial intelligenceAbstrakt
The paper examines the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI), neurodiversity, and trust. It aims to address the gap in understanding the impact AI has on neurodivergent individuals. First, it provides a general introduction to neurodiversity, highlighting its variations and societal significance. Second, the paper introduces AI, focusing on its potential to support neurodivergent individuals in overcoming challenges related to communication, executive functioning, sensory processing, education and socialization. The paper proceeds by exploring the complexities of trust from a philosophical perspective. It stresses that trust in AI could be seen as "delegated trust," which is directed towards the developers, regulators, and institutions behind AI systems rather than the AI itself. However, main focus on trust regarding AI is from the end-user perspective. Ultimately, the paper advocates for carefully crafted regulations that balance the benefits of AI for neurodivergent individuals with the risks of over-reliance and the need for strong privacy protections.
Bibliografia
Afroogh, Saleh, Ali Akbari, Emmie Malone, Mohammadali Kargar, & Hananeh Alambeigi. 2024. “Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11, 1568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04044-8.
Armstrong, Thomas. 2010. Neurodiversity: Discovering the extraordinary gifts of autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other brain differences. 1st ed. Cambridge: Da Capo Press.
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2015. “Neuroethics of neurodiversity.” In Handbook of neuroethics, edited by Jens Clausen & Neil Levy, 1757–63. Dordrecht: Springer.
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2019. “The concept of neurodiversity is dividing the autism community.” The Scientific American. Available at: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-neurodiversity-is-dividing-the-autism-community/.
Benk, Michaela, Sophie Kerstan, Florian von Wangenheim & Andrea Ferrario. 2024. “Twenty-four years of empirical research on trust in AI: a bibliometric review of trends, overlooked issues, and future directions.” AI & Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02059-y.
Bryson, Joanna. 2018. “No one should trust artificial intelligence.” Science & Technology: Innovation, Governance, Technology, published 14.11.2018. Available at: http://ourworld.unu.edu/en/no-one-should-trust-artificial-intelligence.
Chapman, Robert. 2020. “Defining neurodiversity for research and practice.” In Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm, edited by Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Nick Chown, Anna Stenning, 218–20. London: Routledge.
Chown, Nick. 2021. “Neurodiversity.” In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, edited by Fred R. Volkmar, 3134–35, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Crespo, Ricardo. 2024. “Does AI Think?” Scientia et Fides 12(2): 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2024.014.
Desideri, Lorenzo, Marco Negrini, Maria Cristina Cutrone, Aziz Rouame, Massimiliano Malavasi, Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf, Paola Bonifacci & Rita Di Sarro. 2017. “Exploring the use of a humanoid robot to engage children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 242: 501–09.
Dotch, Emily, & Vitica Arnold. 2024. “Inclusive Practices for Child-Centered AI Design and Testing.” arXiv:2404.05920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.05920.
European Commission: Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Publications Office https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/346720.
European Commission. 2024. Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Official Journal version of 13 June 2024. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
European Parliament. 2022. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Applications, risks, and ethical and societal impacts. Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/en/home
Eusebio, Eleazar. 2017. “Neurodiversity.” In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, edited by Kreutzer, Jeffrey, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_9153-1.
Faulkner, Paul. 2011. Knowledge on trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
George, Marie I. 2006. “Aquinas on the nature of trust.” The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 70(1): 103–23. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tho.2006.0029.
Ghassemi, Marzyeh, Mahima Pushkarna, James Wexler, Jesse Johnson & Paul Varghese. 2018. “ClinicalVis: Supporting clinical task-focused design evaluation.” arXiv:1810.05798. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05798.
Grandin, Temple. 2006. Thinking in pictures and other reports from my life with autism. London: Bloomsbury.
Helfer, Thorsten, Kevin Baum, Andreas Sesing-Wagenpfeil, Eva Schmidt & Markus Langer. 2025. “Responsible and trusted AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.” In Bridging the Gap Between AI and Reality, edited by Bernhard Steffen. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75434-0_3.
Horvat, Saša, & Tanja Horvat. 2022. “Creativity, Autism and Relationship to God.” Journal of Disability & Religion 27(2): 342–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2022.2058147.
Huijnen, Claire A. G. J., Monique A. S. Lexis, Rianne Jansens & Luc P. de Witte. 2017. “How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents, and professionals.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47: 3079–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3235-9.
Iannone, Antonio & Daniele Giansanti. 2024. “Breaking barriers—The intersection of AI and assistive technology in autism care: A narrative review.” Journal of Personalized Medicine 14(1), 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010041.
Jaarsma, Pier & Stellan Welin. 2012. “Autism as a natural human variation: Reflections on the claims of the neurodiversity movement.” Health Care Analysis: HCA: Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy 20(1): 20–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9.
Jain, Shomik, Balasubramanian Thiagarajan, Zhonghao Shi, Caitlyn Clabaugh, & Maja J. Matarić. 2020. “Modeling engagement in long-term, in-home socially assistive robot interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders.” Science Robotics 5, eaaz3791.
Kahneman, Daniel. 2013. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kapp, Steven K., Kristen Gillespie-Lynch, Lauren E. Sherman, & Ted Hutman. 2013. “Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity.” Developmental Psychology 49(1): 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353.
Laux, Johann, Sandra Wachter, & Brent Mittelstadt. 2024. “Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk.” Regulation & Governance 18: 3–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12512.
Lemaignan, Séverin, Nigel Newbutt, Louis Rice, Joe Daly, & Vicky Charisi. 2021. “UNICEF guidance on AI for children: Application to the design of a social robot for and with autistic children.” arXiv:2108.12166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.12166.
Lorenz, Timo, Nomi Reznik, & Kathrin Heinitz. 2017. A different point of view: The neurodiversity approach to autism and work. Berlin: Intech. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/65409.
Lumbreras, Sara and Eduardo Garrido-Merchán. 2024. “Insights from Saint Teresa and Saint Augustine on Artificial Intelligence: Discussing Human Interiority.” Scientia et Fides, 12(2): 265–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2024.025.
Milton, Damian E. M. 2012. “On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem’.” Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008.
Milton, Damian, Emine Gurbuz, and Beatriz López. 2022. “The ‘double empathy problem’: Ten years on.” Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice 26(8): 1901–03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221129123.
Robison, John Elder. 2019. “Talking about autism—thoughts for researchers.” Autism Research: Official Journal of the International Society for Autism Research 12(7): 1004–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2119.
Roszak, Piotr, Taylor, Brian J., & Horvat, Saša. 2022. “Does it work? A scholastic epistemology perspective on evidence-based practice in social welfare.” Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought 42(2): 152–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2022.2130850.
Rosqvist, Hanna Bertilsdotter, Anna Stenning & Nick Chown. 2020. “Introduction.” In Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm, edited by Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Nick Chown, Anna Stenning, 1–11. London: Routledge.
Scanlan, Joel, Andrew Eddy, Teresa Thomas, Tele Tan & Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen. 2020. Neurodiverse knowledge, skills and ability assessment for cyber security. ACIS 2020 Proceedings. 99. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2020/99.
Singer, Judy. 1999. “‘Why can’t you be normal for once in your life?’ From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference.” In Disability and discourse, edited by Marian Corker & Sally French. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Silberman, Steve. 2015. NeuroTribes: The legacy of autism and the future of neurodiversity. New York: Avery.
Silvera-Tawil, David, Susan Bruck, Yi Xiao, & DanaKai Bradford. 2022. “Socially-assistive robots to support learning in students on the autism spectrum: Investigating educator perspectives and a pilot trial of a mobile platform to remove barriers to implementation.” Sensors 22(16), 6125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166125.
Stanford Neurodiversity Project. Available at: https://med.stanford.edu/neurodiversity.html.
Søbjerg, Lene Mosegaard, Brian J. Taylor, Jaroslaw Przeperski, Saša Horvat, Hani Nouman & Denise Harvey. 2020. “Using risk factor statistics in decision-making: prospects and challenges.” European Journal of Social Work 24(5): 788–801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1772728.
Sutrop, Margit. 2019. “Should we trust artificial intelligence?” Trames 23(73/68), 4: 499–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2019.4.07.
TEDx Talks. 2024. “What happens when neurodiversity meets AI? Twan Wildeboer.” Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzoLJrg2a8Y.
Thiebes, Scott, Sebastian Lins & Ali Sunyaev. 2021. “Trustworthy artificial intelligence.” Electronic Markets 31: 447–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4.
Yang, Qin, Huan Lu, Dandan Liang, Shengrong Gong, & Huanghao Feng. 2024. “Surprising performances of students with autism in classroom with NAO robot.” arXiv:2407.12014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.12014.
“Trust,” “trusting,” “trustworthy,” 2008. In Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, third edition, 1563. Cambridge University Press.
“Povjerenje,” “pouzdanje,” “pouzdanost,” In Školski rječnik hrvatskog jezika, online edition, Školska knjiga. Accessed 05.09.2020. http://xn--rjenik-k2a.hr/search/?q=pouzdanje.
McLeod, Carolyn. 2020. “Trust.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta (Fall 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/trust/.
“Antropomorfizam.” 2020. Hrvatska enciklopedija, mrežno izdanje. Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža. Accessed 24.09.2020. http://www.enciklopedija.hr/Natuknica.aspx?ID=3198.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Sasa Horvat, Tanja Horvat
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 608
Liczba cytowań: 0
