The Future of AI. Extinction or Death of the Human?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2025.003Słowa kluczowe
artificial intelligence, human existence, models, inforg, symbolic formsAbstrakt
On March 30th, 2023, the CAIS released a statement warning against the danger of human extinction by the ‘hands’ of AI. By reclaiming the phenomenological centrality of death for human existence, I argue that this statement allows for an ontological diagnosis of both the human posture before the emergent progress of AI and the nature of this technology. To develop this diagnosis, I address three questions: What is the human? What is AI? What is the nature of the threat that AI poses to humanity? By drawing from Cassirer, Heidegger, Jankélévitch, and Landsberg, I firstly consider the human as animal symbolicum moritūrus and argue that the symbolic encounter with dead loved Thou represents a phenomenon of genuine human individuation. In following Dupuy, I then identify the core ontological feature of AI with model making and show how, in time, the model has taken ontological precedence over phenomenal. Lastly, I explain how the threat posed by AI coincides with the modeling abstraction of the animal symbolicum moritūrus into a dephysicalized inforg. Here, I maintain that the digitalized existence instantiated by AI coincides with an ontological shift: life reduced to an enhanced computational synthesis of matrixes is tantamount to an existence insolubly diverging from human life. AI progress is now forcing humanity to readdress the scandal that lays at the core of existence: not the extermination brought about by a Skynet-type AI, but the overt presence of a personalized death. What is the future going to look like? It is hard to tell, but I suggest that what awaits humanity is a grim fate were death not to take back its due ontological right.
Bibliografia
Bartneck, Christoph et al. 2021. An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI. Cham: Springer.
Breton, Philippe. 1984. “La cybernetique et les ingenieurs dans les annees cinquante.” Culture technique 12: 155–161.
CAIS, 2023. “Statement on AI Risk. AI Experts and Public Figures Express their Concern about AI Risk.” Accessed July 31. https://www.safe.ai/work/statement-on-ai-risk.
Cassirer, Ernst. 2021. An Essay on Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.
DiMatteo, Larry A., Cristina Poncibò, and Michel Cannarsa (eds.) 2022. The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dubber, Markus D., Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das. 2020. The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 2009. On the Origins of Cognitive Science. The Mechanization of the Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Floridi, Luciano. 2023. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, Luciano. 2010. Information. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, Brian Patrick. 2018. “Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence.” Scientia et Fides 6(2): 9–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2018.015.
Harrison, Robert P. 2003. The Dominion of the Dead. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1985. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Translated by Theodore Kiesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1976. “Nur noch ein Gott kan uns retten.” Der Spiegel 23: 193–219.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward S. Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hendrycks, Dan, Mantas Mazeika, and Thomas Woodside. “An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risk.” Accessed July 31, 2024. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.12001.
Hutson, James, Jeremiah Ratican, and Colleen Biri. 2023. “Essence as Algorithm: Public Perceptions of AI-Powered Avatars of Real People.” DS Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics 1(2): 1–14
Hutson, James, and Jeremiah Ratican. 2023. “Life, death, and AI: Exploring digital necromancy in popular culture. Ethical considerations, technological limitations, and the pet cemetery conundrum.” Metaverse 4(1): 1–12.
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. La mort. Paris: Flammarion, 1977.
König, Pascal D. 2022. “Essence of AI. What is AI?” In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Larry A. DiMatteo et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krois, Micheal J. 2005. “‘A Passion Can Only be Overcome by a Stronger Passion:’ Philosophical Anthropology before and after Ernst Cassirer.” European Review 13(4): 557–575.
Landsberg, Paul-Luis. 1953. The Experience of Death. London: The Camelot Press.
Lumbreras, Sara and Eduardo Garrido-Merchán. 2024. “Insights from Saint Teresa and Saint Augustine on Artificial Intelligence: Discussing Human Interiority.” Scientia et Fides 12(2): 265–295.
Mazzi, Francesca, and Luciano Floridi. 2023. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence for the Sustainable Development Goals. Cham: Springer.
McCulloch, Warren S. 1965. Embodiments of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Oderberg, David. 2012. “Disembodied Communication and Religious Experience: The Online Model.” Philosophy and Technology 25: 381–397.
Pieper, Josef. 2000. Death and Immortality. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.
Rahner, Karl. 1961. On the Theology of Death. New York: Herder and Herder.
Sheehan, Thomas, ed. 1981. Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker. Chicago: Precedent.
Sheikh, Haroon, Corien Prins, and Erik Schrijvers. 2021. Mission AI. Cham: Springer.
Stokes, Patrick. 2021. Digital Souls. London: Bloomsbury.
Wang, Pei. 2019. “On Defining Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 10(2):1–37.
Wiener, Norbert. 1945. “The Role of Models in Science.” Philosophy of Science 12(4): 316–321.
Wrathall, Mark. 2005. How to Read Heidegger. London: Granta.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Paolo Pellecchia

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 383
Liczba cytowań: 0