Differentiating Human Enhancement and Transhumanism: Better or Perfect?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2025.007Słowa kluczowe
biological body, future, human enhancement, mind uploading, transhumanismAbstrakt
Philosophical concern for the human future is more important today than ever because of the ethical, social, and technological challenges we face—Human Enhancement (HE) and Transhumanism (H+) are some of the theories that are involved with the future of our species. These two positions tend to be confused, but we contend that a distinction can and should be made between the two approaches. To perform this explanation, we propose two axes of differentiation: the concept of enhancement itself and the valuation of the biological body. In this context, H+ begins with a disregard for the body and seeks to transcend the human condition with exponential enhancements, while HE advocates a gradual enhancement within our current limits. Clarifying this contrast between H+ and HE is vital for the responsible adoption of future technologies, enabling informed decisions about which scientific promises are viable and worthy of support, and which should be reconsidered.Bibliografia
Agar, Nicholas. 2010. Humanity’s End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement. MIT University Press.
Agar, Nicholas. 2014. Truly Human Enhancement: A Philosophical Defense of Limits. The MIT Press.
Alonso, Marcos. 2020. “Memory, neuroscience and memory enhancement.” Canadian Journal of Bioethics 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1068759ar.
Armstrong, Stuart, and Anders Sandberg. 2013. “Eternity in six hours: Intergalactic spreading of intelligent life and sharpening the Fermi paradox.” Acta Astronautica 89: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.04.002.
Benatar, David. 2006. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. Oxford University Press.
Bishop, Jeffrey P. 2023. “Transhumanism’s WEIRD Religion: On the Ontotheological Morality of the Posthuman.” Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 10(2): 175–98. 10.1628/ptsc-2023-0020.
Bostrom, Nick. 2002. “Existential risks: Analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 9. https://www.jetpress.org/volume9/risks.html.
Bostrom, Nick. 2005. “A history of transhumanist thought.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 14(1). https://www.jetpress.org/volume14/bostrom.html.
Bostrom, Nick. 2008. “Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up.” In Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, eds B. Gordijn, & R. Chadwick. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8852-0_8.
Bostrom, Nick. 2013. “Existential risk prevention as global priority.” Global Policy 4(1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12002.
Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.
Bostrom, Nick. 2024. Deep Utopia: Life and Meaning in a Solved World. Ideapress Pub.
Brennan, Cian. 2023. “Weak transhumanism: Moderate enhancement as a non-radical path to radical enhancement.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 44(3): 229–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-023-09606-6.
Chalmers, David, J. 2010. “The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 17(9–10): 7–65. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2010/00000017/f0020009/art00001.
de Grey, Aubrey, and Michael Rae. 2007. Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs that Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. St. Martin’s Press.
Diéguez, Antonio. 2017. Transhumanismo: La búsqueda tecnológica del mejoramiento humano. Herder editorial.
Diéguez, Antonio. 2021. Cuerpos inadecuados: El desafío transhumanista a la filosofía. Herder Editorial.
Diéguez, Antonio, and Pablo García-Barranquero. 2024. “The Singularity, Superintelligent Machines, and Mind Uploading: The technological future?” In Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, edited by F. Lara & J. Deckers. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48135-2_12.
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2019. “The dream of transcending the human through the digital matrix: A relational critique.” Scientia et Fides 7(2): 171–93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2019.022.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
García-Barranquero, Pablo. 2021. “Transhumanist immortality: Understanding the dream as a nightmare.” Scientia et Fides 9(1): 177–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2021.006.
García-Barranquero, Pablo. 2022. “Beyond the weak and strong life extension division: Don’t add years to life if you cannot add life to those years.” ARBOR Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 198(805), e654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2022.805002.
García-Barranquero, Pablo, and Antonio Diéguez. 2022. “El doble efecto de la pandemia en el discurso transhumanista.” Recerca. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi 27(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.6155.
Glannon, Walter. 2008. “Psychopharmacological enhancement.” Neuroethics 1: 45–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-008-9005-9.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Polity.
Harris, John. 2007. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton University Press.
Harris, John. 2011. “Moral enhancement and freedom.” Bioethics 25(2): 102–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01854.x.
Hauskeller, Michael. 2014. Better Humans: Understanding the Enhancement Project. Routledge.
Hofmann, Bjørn. 2017. “Limits to human enhancement: Nature, disease, therapy or betterment?” BMC Medical Ethics 18: 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0215-8.
Juengst, Eric. T, and David Moseley. 2016. “Human enhancement”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/enhancement/.
Kass, Leon. 2002. Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. Encounter books.
Kudlek, Karolina. 2022. “Challenges in the human enhancement debate: A critical review.” Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology 26(2). https://doi.org/10.5840/techne202278160.
Kurzweil, Raymond. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin.
Lyreskog, David. M, and Alex McKeown. 2022. “On the (non-)rationality of human enhancement and transhumanism.” Science and Engineering Ethics 28(6): 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00410-4.
López Cambronero, Marcelo. 2023. “Metaverse, religions and metahumans: A window to a hypercontrolled post-pandemic world.” Scientia et Fides 11(1): 121–35. https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.010.
MacAskill, William. 2022. What We Owe the Future. Simon and Schuster.
Malmqvist, Erik. 2014. “Reproductive choice, enhancement, and the moral continuum argument.” The Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 39(1): 41–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht058.
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. 2008. “The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25(3): 162–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Rueda, Jon. 2024. “Genetic enhancement, human extinction, and the best interests of posthumanity.” Bioethics 38: 529–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13085.
Rueda, Jon, Pablo García-Barranquero, and Francisco Lara. (2021). “Doctor, please make me freer: Capabilities enhancement as a goal of medicine.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24(3): 409–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10016-5.
Sandberg, Anders. 2015. “Transhumanism and the meaning of life.” In Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement, edited by Tracy Trothen and Calvin Mercer, 3–22. Praeger.
Sandel, Michael. 2007. The Case Against Perfection. Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Belknap Press.
Savulescu, Julian. 2006. “Justice, fairness, and enhancement.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1093: 321–38. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1382.021.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Pablo García-Barranquero, Marcos Alonso Fernández
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 2378
Liczba cytowań: 0
